Go Back   Cycling Forums » Other Stuff » Other Groups » alt.mountain-bike » alt.mountain-bike archive
alt.mountain-bike archive This forum is a gateway to the alt.mountain-bike usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propogated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section!













Norco vs. Kona?

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31.-2003
Paul Westall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Norco vs. Kona?

I'm considiering buying a full suspension mtb. I have been riding a Kona hardtail for 5 years and
have been satisfied with it. However, I am hearing that Kona is sort of coaasting on its reputation
and that the quality of bikes is suffering. Lots of posts about broken frames, non functionaing
components etc. Are Norco really more reliable overall? A better deal? Looking for a sturdy trail
bike (I'm about 190lbs) that can take som moderate drops and jumps . Anyone on the group riding a
Norco? Paul
  #2  
Old 03-31.-2003
Greg Marshall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Norco vs. Kona?

I've ridden a bunch of Norco bikes and ben happy with them all. Norco rules. I don't think anything
out there offers better value.

I'm currently riding a Norco team 853 hardtail, and a Norco Drop freeride bike. Both are great
bikes, and I'm about the same weight as you. I thrash the hard tail pretty hard, no big drops, but
If I did that stuff on it I'd be more worried about the wheels than the frame. Two years ago, I rode
nearly the same component spec on a kona explosif frame, and the head tube ovalized in one season. I
wasn't impressed.

I don't know what your idea of moderate drops is, but my drop has handled five footers to flat and
bigger stuff to a good downhill tranny with no problems.

Buy Norco.

Greg.

Paul Westall wrote:

> I'm considiering buying a full suspension mtb. I have been riding a Kona hardtail for 5 years and
> have been satisfied with it. However, I am hearing that Kona is sort of coaasting on its
> reputation and that the quality of bikes is suffering. Lots of posts about broken frames, non
> functionaing components etc. Are Norco really more reliable overall? A better deal? Looking for a
> sturdy trail bike (I'm about 190lbs) that can take som moderate drops and jumps . Anyone on the
> group riding a Norco? Paul
  #3  
Old 04-01.-2003
Paul Westall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Norco vs. Kona?

Thanks for the info. The Drop looks a bit heavy duty for me. I'm going to try and get to a couple of
shops next week and check out the Fluid. Also the Rage looks like a good deal, but probably very
hard to find any leftovers from last year (and a bit on the heavy side for most of my riding.) Paul
"Greg Marshall" <earthboy@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3E8911B9.BD507365@rogers.com...
> I've ridden a bunch of Norco bikes and ben happy with them all. Norco
rules. I
> don't think anything out there offers better value.
>
> I'm currently riding a Norco team 853 hardtail, and a Norco Drop freeride
bike.
> Both are great bikes, and I'm about the same weight as you. I thrash the
hard
> tail pretty hard, no big drops, but If I did that stuff on it I'd be more worried about the wheels
> than the frame. Two years ago, I rode nearly the
same
> component spec on a kona explosif frame, and the head tube ovalized in one season. I wasn't
> impressed.
>
> I don't know what your idea of moderate drops is, but my drop has handled
five
> footers to flat and bigger stuff to a good downhill tranny with no
problems.
>
> Buy Norco.
>
> Greg.
  #4  
Old 04-01.-2003
Slacker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Norco vs. Kona?

"Paul Westall" <pwestall@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:vlria.405$J8.323@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> Thanks for the info. The Drop looks a bit heavy duty for me. I'm going to try and get to a couple
> of shops next week and check out the Fluid. Also the Rage looks like a good deal, but probably
> very hard to find any leftovers from last year (and a bit on the heavy side for most of my
> riding.) Paul

The Fluid is a great little bike. Nearly bought myself one.
--
Slacker
  #5  
Old 04-02.-2003
Jan Sacharuk
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Norco vs. Kona?

In article <vlria.405$J8.323@twister.nyroc.rr.com>, Paul Westall wrote:
> Thanks for the info. The Drop looks a bit heavy duty for me. I'm going to try and get to a couple
> of shops next week and check out the Fluid. Also the Rage looks like a good deal, but probably
> very hard to find any leftovers from last year (and a bit on the heavy side for most of my
> riding.)

I ride a VPS-3, which is pretty hefty. Last year when I went to Fernie, I rode with my local Norco
rep, and he was riding a Fluid. He had nothing but good things to say about it (of course) but
beyond that, it seemed to hold up pretty well. It's sturdy, and quite a lot lighter than my VPS. I'd
say go for Norco. (Besides, I think their paintjobs are better, too.

JS

--
========================= jan@chloris.ca ========================
Jan Sacharuk Member in Good Standing of The Discordian Solidarity Turn on viewing of the X-Geek-Code
header to see my Geek Code
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Bored now. This is the part that's less fun. When there isn't any
screaming." - Evil Willow, Buffy the Vampire Slayer
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish