PDA
















Consumer Reports Trashes Supplements.... what they should publish

View Full Version : Consumer Reports Trashes Supplements.... what they should publish




Steve Bayt
  
STEVE BAYT (Brook Park/Parma, Ohio)

THESE POSTINGS ARE COURTESY OF THE IRRESPONSIBLE ARTICLE IN
THIS MONTH's CONSUMER REPORTS. WITHOUT SUCH PATHETIC
JOURNALISM THESE POSTINGS WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN NECESSARY.

This month's Consumer Reports does horrible injustice to the
Nutritional Supplement industry. These postings hopefully,
will be read by enough people to equal the readership of
Consumer Reports.

According to Frontline, in the 160 years of medical record
keeping, 70,000 people have required medical treatment due
to Nutritional Supplement use. That is an average of 450
Americans annually have to go to hospitals for supplement
use. In 2001, an average year, 107,000,000 Americans had to
go to hospitals, according to the 2004 World Almanac.

Consumer Reports endorses Senate Bill 722 which would apply
to supplements the same standards of prescription drugs
which produce 2,100,000 hospitalizations and 106,000
American deaths every year.

The government should be establishing programs to encourage
supplement use, and even require those who can't afford
health care (Medicare people) to take them. For an ounce of
prevention is worth a ton of cure. And taking supplements is
indeed contrary to the disclaimer on all containers and
marketing. For example, it costs about $8 for a measles
shot, but $4,000 to treat a kid with measles.

The government and media seem to be intimidated by the
surreal success of supplements. Friday most networks had
stories on The Consumer Reports story filled with anecdotal
stories of the one in 50,000 supplement users who can't
follow directions on labels, or who didn't tell their
doctors what they were taking.

Virtually every supplement container has so many directions
that one could easily forget what one is actually consuming.

The statistics quoted in Consumer Reports were entirely from
THE FDA which has been out to get The Supplement Industry
for decades.

The fact is that the annual average death rate from
Supplement use is
116. There are more than 116 Driving Deaths in an hour in
America. Yet, driving is very much legal.

The few "Durbin Poster Boys" (similar to KS Poster Boys in
SF in 1981) that Consumer Reports used comprise such a small
number of supplement casualties that medical science can't
form protocols. Nor make any suggestions on treating
supplement patients.

With a few hundred thousand doctors in America, it's not
inconceivable a 25-year-old Intern back in the 1950's is yet
to see their first supplement misuse patient. There are
probably hospitals, which treat only one or two supplement
patients in a year.

The reason why "The FDA doesn't approve these claims. Yada
yada yada." Is that there aren't enough people who have
suffered symptoms to comprise a valid number of cases for a
case study. It's not financially worth while for either the
government, nor the private sector to do such studies. For a
bazillion dollars would have to be spent to treat the 450-
ish American supplement users in need of medical treatment.

There are manufacturing quality ratings called "Six Sigma"
and ISO9000. There are about 15 million Americans who
consume about $1,500 yearly in supplements (I call them the
15/15 club). There are also an additional 15 or so million
Americans who take much less but still considerable amounts.

Yet, with the 15/15 club and the other casual users, only
450 Americans (out of 107,500,000 ER visits) have to go to
hospitals annually. That is a success record beyond even Six
Sigma or ISO900.

The best doctors can do is tell those 450 to drink lots of
water, take laxatives then stay near bathrooms for days. For
there simply isn't enough of a sample to draw conclusions on
treatments. In order to get FDA Approval there will have to
be a case study with more people than suffer adverse events.

The Consumer Reports cover uses the word deaths. Yet, no
other activity in America produces so few (annual average
116) deaths.

Senator Durbin should be starting a commission to get
supplements from undercapitalized manufacturers who didn't
figure for marketing and distribution. Although Americans
consume $19 billion yearly on Supplements, undercapitalized
manufacturers throw away billions of dollars of unsold
inventory. The government should get those before they are
thrown out and give them to People With AIDS, and others who
can't afford them. Those that could have many diseases
prevented yet can't afford medical care.

The virtually negligible cost of acquiring the trash bound
supplements then distributing them via Homeless Shelters,
AIDS Centers, Free Clinics would save Americans bazillions
of billions of dollars spent every year in government
financed low income medical treatment. Most of those treated
had problems which could have been prevented.

Instead of Durbin and the media being intimidated by the
surreal success of the Nutritional Supplement industry. They
should be using the industry to save millions of lives and
bazillions of dollars.

Consumer Reports should be condemned for creating any type
of impression that supplements are dangerous. They took 12
dangerous supplements which only 1 in 50,000 Americans
(including the 15/15 club) provide enough consumers to
market. Yet, not one paragraph or word told of the thousands
of supplements which thousands of doctors are now
prescribing to patients.

Thousands of doctors are going to jail and loosing their
licenses because they are sick of the barbaric practice of
issuing drugs with horrific side effects. Instead going to
alternative therapies which have a greater success with less
side effects.

Consumer Reports should do stories on the best supplements
and profiles on the hero and heroine doctors who are going
to alternative therapies.

As for the medical community and it's use of supplements.
That will be for my next article sometime before April
9,2004. These articles will be cross posted until the equal
number of people read the truth that Consumer Reports
didn't tell.

Help in posting would be appreciated.

Dirk
  
"Steve Bayt" <caballaros@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2bc5b2c5.0404051503.5a52ab32@posting.google.com...

> There are about 15 million Americans who consume about
> $1,500 yearly in supplements (I call them the 15/15 club).

Well, that's one thing you could call them.

--

Dirk

**

"i could ramble on for days about the psychological
neediness of a dog owner vs. the independent, need no
grovelling affection to prove you're in charge strength of
cat owners. but i won't."

--sam hutcheson settles an ancient dispute

to email reverse moc.liamtoh@redneb_ad **

Keith Stone
  
caballaros@yahoo.com (Steve Bayt) wrote in message news:<2bc5b2c5.0404051503.5a52ab32@posting.google.com>...
> STEVE BAYT (Brook Park/Parma, Ohio)

> As for the medical community and it's use of supplements.
> That will be for my next article sometime before April
> 9,2004. These articles will be cross posted until the
> equal number of people read the truth that Consumer
> Reports didn't tell.
>
> Help in posting would be appreciated.

Oh goody. I look forward to more postings from some dumb-ass
shister who wants to help out an industry best known for
lengthing one's dong.

BTW, for the uninformed (like Mr Bayt), Six Sigma and
ISO9000 have nothing to do with whether the product being
made actually works. Six Sigma and ISO9000 only mean that
the companies producing the schlock follow a documented
process so the schlock comes out the same each time.
(Actually, that it comes out following documented
tolerances).

Doug Freese
  
Keith Stone wrote:

> BTW, for the uninformed (like Mr Bayt), Six Sigma and
> ISO9000 have nothing to do with whether the product being
> made actually works. Six Sigma and ISO9000 only mean that
> the companies producing the schlock follow a documented
> process so the schlock comes out the same each time.
> (Actually, that it comes out following documented
> tolerances).

Amen! I worked for a very large company and we had an ISO
certified documented process that continuously showed we
shipped long before it was ready. If in year 1 we shipped
with a 1,000 bugs all we need to do was show we shipped in
year 2 with 999 bugs. In some cases we would fix trivial
bugs to meet that criteria.

There was time when companies took pride shipping a product
after extensive testing to get all but the trivial errors
removed so the customer would be happy. This would even
involve delaying the ship date. In the past 5-8 years
quality as a concept got shoved under the carpet. The buzz
is now "time to market" and since everyone shoves quality
in the dumpster, the customer suffers since there is
nothing better.

As for ISO it should be renamed ISS - I Ship ****. 6 Sigma?
That's the forth biggest lie.

--
Doug Freese "Caveat Lector" dfreeseS@NOBShvc.rr.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
BulgarianCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishFinnishFrenchGermanItalianJapaneseKoreanNorwegianPolishPortugueseSpanishSwedish
Multilingual forum supported by vBET Translator 3.2.2