PDA
















OT Fuel protests

View Full Version : OT Fuel protests




Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

Martinm
  
Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are threatening
to blockade petrol stations etc etc in protest at the
Goverment's excise duty; err, I thought the price of crude
was the cause of the 81p (No Daily Mail that is not 3.64 a
gallon!)per litre, not a sudden leap in duty. So G Brown has
to continually revise the country's budget to suit the lorry
drivers does he? Hopefully this time it won't be left up to
individual petrol stations to decide what an essential user
is. Of course this will have terrible knock on effect on the
price of tyres / chain lube so we may all have to stop
riding bikes ;-)

Simon Mason
  
"MartinM" <Martinm2@wcms.org.uk> wrote in message
news:3cf5c6dc.0405160307.17357b12@posting.google.com...
> Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are threatening
> to blockade petrol stations etc etc in protest at the
> Goverment's excise duty; err, I thought the price of crude
> was the cause of the 81p (No Daily Mail that is not 3.64 a
> gallon!)per litre, not a sudden leap in duty. So G Brown
> has to continually revise the country's budget to suit the
> lorry drivers does he? Hopefully this time it won't be
> left up to individual petrol stations to decide what an
> essential user is. Of course this will have terrible knock
> on effect on the price of tyres / chain lube so we may all
> have to stop riding bikes ;-)

I won't be protesting - the more I cycle, the more I save
and since I am employed by a major oil company, my shares
go up as well :-)

--
Simon Mason Anlaby East Yorkshire. 53°44'N 0°26'WT
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net (http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/)

Martin Harlow
  
In article
<3cf5c6dc.0405160307.17357b12@posting.google.com>, MartinM
<Martinm2@wcms.org.uk> writes
>Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are threatening
>to blockade petrol stations etc etc in protest at the
>Goverment's excise duty; err, I thought the price of crude
>was the cause of the 81p (No Daily Mail that is not 3.64 a
>gallon!)per litre, not a sudden leap in duty. So G Brown
>has to continually revise the country's budget to suit the
>lorry drivers does he? Hopefully this time it won't be left
>up to individual petrol stations to decide what an
>essential user is. Of course this will have terrible knock
>on effect on the price of tyres / chain lube so we may all
>have to stop riding bikes ;-)

The tail has been wagging the dog for a while on this one -
the media desperately doom-mongering by asking 'Will
increased fuel prices lead to protests? If we keep banging
on about it long enough, maybe it will.' Looks like they've
got there in the end.

ttfn

Martin

--
'I used to have an open mind but my brains kept falling
out.' Steven Wright

Martin Harlow martin@freedonia.demon.co.uk

Richard Bullock
  
I thought the price of crude was the cause of the 81p (No
Daily
> Mail that is not 3.64 a gallon!)per litre, not a sudden
> leap in duty.

Umm, there's 4.54609 litres to a gallon - so 81p per litre =
£3.68 per gallon.

Just Zis Guy
  
On 16 May 2004 04:07:19 -0700, Martinm2@wcms.org.uk (MartinM) wrote in
message <3cf5c6dc.0405160307.17357b12@posting.google.com>:

>Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are threatening
>to blockade petrol stations etc etc in protest at the
>Goverment's excise duty;

Which hasn't changed. Hilarious. As before, I shall laugh
and point as I ride past the petrol queues :-)

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk (http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/)

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

Tony Raven
  
MartinM wrote:

> > So G Brown has to continually revise the country's
> > budget to suit the
> lorry drivers does he?
>

To be fair he'll be raking it in in North Sea Oil revenues
and at the end of the day the lorry drivers will pass on
the fuel costs so that prices of food etc will rise and hit
those who can least afford it. Worked out a few days ago
with a friend over from the US that the absolute rise in
fuel prices is about the same both sides of the Atlantic
but the proportionate rise in the US is massively greater
because, with low tax, they start off from a much lower
base price.

Tony

Simon Mason
  
"Tony Raven" <junk@raven-family.com> wrote in message
news:2gpbd2F514lrU2@uni-berlin.de...
> MartinM wrote:
>
> > > So G Brown has to continually revise the country's
> > > budget to suit the
> > lorry drivers does he?
> >
>
> To be fair he'll be raking it in in North Sea Oil revenues
> and at the end
of
> the day the lorry drivers will pass on the fuel costs so
> that prices of
food
> etc will rise and hit those who can least afford it.

Don't forget the huge amount of extra cash he gets in VAT
on fuel every time the pump price goes up.

--

Simon M.

Mark Thompson
  
> To be fair he'll be raking it in in North Sea Oil revenues
> and at the end of the day the lorry drivers will pass on
> the fuel costs so that prices of food etc will rise and
> hit those who can least afford it. Worked out a few days
> ago with a friend over from the US that the absolute rise
> in fuel prices is about the same both sides of the
> Atlantic but the proportionate rise in the US is massively
> greater because, with low tax, they start off from a much
> lower base price.

Wahey, so the tax on petrol is doing all us poor people a
favour - it makes the price less volatile and helps us
budget :-)

Simon Mason
  
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <outlook.bugs@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2qsea01333si8435f22vo22uiegpahudjn@4ax.com...
> On 16 May 2004 04:07:19 -0700, Martinm2@wcms.org.uk
> (MartinM) wrote in message
> <3cf5c6dc.0405160307.17357b12@posting.google.com>:
>
> >Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are
> >threatening to blockade petrol stations etc etc in
> >protest at the Goverment's excise duty;
>
> Which hasn't changed. Hilarious. As before, I shall laugh
> and point as I ride past the petrol queues :-)

What? In your Volvo? ;-)

--
Simon M.

\ Dave
  
"Simon Mason" <simon@simonmason.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3dGcnfg_9cKtFzrdSa8jmA@karoo.co.uk...
>
> "Tony Raven" <junk@raven-family.com> wrote in message news:2gpbd2F514lrU2@uni-
> berlin.de...
> > MartinM wrote:
> >
> > > > So G Brown has to continually revise the country's
> > > > budget to suit
the
> > > lorry drivers does he?
> > >
> >
> > To be fair he'll be raking it in in North Sea Oil
> > revenues and at the
end
> of
> > the day the lorry drivers will pass on the fuel costs so
> > that prices of
> food
> > etc will rise and hit those who can least afford it.
>
> Don't forget the huge amount of extra cash he gets in VAT
> on fuel every time the pump price goes up.
>
> --
>
> Simon M.
>
Overall to the tune of something like £3billion I heard
recently. He doesn't have to increase tax on fuel 'cos this
has had the desired effect and he can just raise his hands
with a 'wunt me' ;-) ....it's them nasty terrirrists!! Dave
Cynical?!!? - Wot, me??

David Hansen
  
On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:43:48 +0100 someone who may be "Tony Raven"
<junk@raven-family.com> wrote this:-

>the lorry drivers will pass on the fuel costs so that
>prices of food etc will rise and hit those who can least
>afford it.

Transport is still a small proportion of the cost of
producing goods. In addition most transport costs are fixed
(loading bays and the like). Changes in transport costs have
little impact on the price of goods in the shops, other
things have far more impact.

--
David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number
F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK
government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.

Zog The Undenia
  
MartinM wrote:

> Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are threatening
> to blockade petrol stations etc etc in protest at the
> Goverment's excise duty; err, I thought the price of crude
> was the cause of the 81p (No Daily Mail that is not 3.64 a
> gallon!)per litre, not a sudden leap in duty. So G Brown
> has to continually revise the country's budget to suit the
> lorry drivers does he? Hopefully this time it won't be
> left up to individual petrol stations to decide what an
> essential user is. Of course this will have terrible knock
> on effect on the price of tyres / chain lube so we may all
> have to stop riding bikes ;-)

Robin Hood my ****! They're hauliers and farmers running
commercial businesses. If the Govt slashed duty on diesel
for trucks and doubled it on petrol, they'd be happy.

Just Zis Guy
  
On Sun, 16 May 2004 16:36:10 +0100, "Simon Mason"
<simon@simonmason.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
<z4qcnWB0dOf1FzrdSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk>:

> What? In your Volvo? ;-)

Oh yes, I did drive once this week, I'd forgotten.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk (http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/)

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

Colin McKenzie
  
Tony Raven wrote:
> To be fair he'll be raking it in in North Sea Oil revenues
> and at the end of the day the lorry drivers will pass on
> the fuel costs so that prices of food etc will rise and
> hit those who can least afford it.

Which will be no bad thing if it makes locally-produced food
look cheaper. Decades of cheap fuel have resulted in food
(and much else) being transported much more than necessary -
fuel is too cheap compared to wage rates.

Sustained higher fuel prices will result in companies and
individuals reorganising their lives to use less. In the
meantime there will be some pain which I for one will not be
very sympathetic about.

Colin McKenzie

--
Why believe statistics? Ignore them and you can believe the
damned lies instead!

Martinm
  
"Tony Raven" <junk@raven-family.com> wrote in message news:<2gpbd2F514lrU2@uni-berlin.de>...
> MartinM wrote:
>
> > > So G Brown has to continually revise the country's
> > > budget to suit the
> > lorry drivers does he?
> >
>
> To be fair he'll be raking it in in North Sea Oil revenues
> and at the end of the day the lorry drivers will pass on
> the fuel costs so that prices of food etc will rise and
> hit those who can least afford it. Worked out a few days
> ago with a friend over from the US that the absolute rise
> in fuel prices is about the same both sides of the
> Atlantic but the proportionate rise in the US is massively
> greater because, with low tax, they start off from a much
> lower base price.
>
> Tony

And absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the 2000
ringleader Brynle Williams is now a Tory member of the Welsh
Assembly! I suppose if you believe that instability in Iraq
is the cause then Blair is partly to blame, but I'm sure M
Howard will sit on his hands through this one.

Sam Salt
  
Zog The Undeniable wrote:
> MartinM wrote:
>
>> Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are
>> threatening to blockade petrol stations etc etc in
>> protest at the Goverment's excise duty; err, I thought
>> the price of crude was the cause of the 81p (No Daily
>> Mail that is not 3.64 a gallon!)per litre, not a sudden
>> leap in duty. So G Brown has to continually revise the
>> country's budget to suit the lorry drivers does he?
>> Hopefully this time it won't be left up to individual
>> petrol stations to decide what an essential user is. Of
>> course this will have terrible knock on effect on the
>> price of tyres / chain lube so we may all have to stop
>> riding bikes ;-)
>
> Robin Hood my ****! They're hauliers and farmers running
> commercial businesses. If the Govt slashed duty on diesel
> for trucks and doubled it on petrol, they'd be happy.

Ran a Half Marathon in Leeds this morning.Of course the
majority of the roads were closed/blocked off.With a few
exceptions cars were stood with their engines running in the
resulting long queues.Petrol too expensive ? Not too
expensive to waste evidently.

Sam Salt

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-
virus system (http://www.grisoft.com (http://www.grisoft.com/)). Version: 6.0.686 /
Virus Database: 447 - Release Date: 14/05/2004

Nick Kew
  
In article <Xns94EBA8AB0C3ACpleasegivegenerously@195.92.193.157>,
Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> writes:

> Wahey, so the tax on petrol is doing all us poor people a
> favour - it makes the price less volatile and helps us
> budget :-)

Us poor folks need *much* higher petrol prices, so as to
stimulate a real market-share for non-car-based lifestyles
(telecommuting, cycling, public transport, local services
and facilities, etc). Only when the middle classes start to
think about what they're doing (as opposed to moan about
what everyone else is doing) will we cease to be
marginalised.

--
Nick Kew

Nick's manifesto: http://www.htmlhelp.com/~nick/

Martinm
  
Zog The Undeniable <hrothgar19@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<40a79e3c.0@entanet>...
> MartinM wrote:
>
> > Once more the "Robin Hood" fuel protesters are
> > threatening to blockade petrol stations etc etc in
> > protest at the Goverment's excise duty; err, I thought
> > the price of crude was the cause of the 81p (No Daily
> > Mail that is not 3.64 a gallon!)per litre, not a sudden
> > leap in duty. So G Brown has to continually revise the
> > country's budget to suit the lorry drivers does he?
> > Hopefully this time it won't be left up to individual
> > petrol stations to decide what an essential user is. Of
> > course this will have terrible knock on effect on the
> > price of tyres / chain lube so we may all have to stop
> > riding bikes ;-)
>
> Robin Hood my ****! They're hauliers and farmers running
> commercial businesses. If the Govt slashed duty on diesel
> for trucks and doubled it on petrol, they'd be happy.

IIRC a recent survey showed that fuel prices would have to
increase by 4 to 5 fold to have any noticeable effect or
private car use. Supposedly the Government has new powers to
restrict fuel to essential services in the event of
blockades (ie you don't get to fill up just by turning up an
a nurses uniform). I'm an NHS worker and was not allowed to
buy it last time; good thing I commute by train ;-)

Simon Mason
  
"Simon Brooke" <simon@jasmine.org.uk> wrote in message
news:uu2ln1-5av.ln1@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk...

>
> No they aren't. No farmer in Britain runs a commerical
> business. They're hugely subsidised out of your tax money
> - to the tune of (in Scotland) an average of £26,000 per
> annum each. And, remember, next time you see a huge
> tractor on the road, not only did you pay for it out of
> your taxes, but the fuel it's burning doesn't pay a penny
> to the exchequer.

Are farmers allowed to use red diesel on public roads?
--
Simon M.

Simon Mason
  
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <outlook.bugs@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:q1dfa0dm58ln88orreh99tk3uhdh5l1gkd@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 16:36:10 +0100, "Simon Mason"
> <simon@simonmason.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> <z4qcnWB0dOf1FzrdSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk>:
>
> > What? In your Volvo? ;-)
>
> Oh yes, I did drive once this week, I'd forgotten.

Yes I can talk. I drive to work when I'm on nights and to
collect my beer supplies to the tune of about 6 times week.
So I'm not worthy ;-)

--
Simon Mason Anlaby East Yorkshire. 53°44'N 0°26'WT
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net (http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/)

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
BulgarianCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishFinnishFrenchGermanItalianJapaneseKoreanNorwegianPolishPortugueseSpanishSwedish
Translations supported by vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2