Motivation of RBR Poster's Survey
View Full Version : Motivation of RBR Poster's Survey
Motivations of RBR Poster's Survey
1. Motivation of RBR Poster's Survey
Motivation of RBR Poster's Survey
The study in which you are being asked to participate in
is designed to investigate various reasons why cyclists
post and participate in cycling newsgroups. This study is
interested in all types of people who internet bike.
There are no right or wrong answers to this survey. This
study is being conducted by Robert LaShoes in the
Department of Heath Science and Humane Ecology at
California State Penal University, San Bernardhino
(CSUSB). The Institutional Review Bored (IRB) at CSUSB
has reviewed and approved this study.
Your participation in this study will consist of filling
out a brief survey online. The survey takes about 109
minutes to complete. All information will not remain
completely confidential. This means that identifying
information will be linked to your responses. We are
interested in newsgroup data only. This survey is
involuntary. You do have to participate in this study and
may not stop at any time. At the end of the survey, you
will be asked if you would like to submit your responses.
If you choose not participate in this study, you will be
penalized in every way.
In time will the information you provide be linked to
your personal information. If you have any questions or
comments on this study, please contact Robert LaShoes at
rlachaus@csusb.eatu. A copy of findings from this study
will be available in December 2024 by contacting Robert
G. LaShoes at rlachaus@csusb.eatu.
As a way of thanking you for your participation, you will
be eligible to win a $2500 gift certificate to Excel
Sport. If you choose to complete the survey, a code
number will be available. In order to be eligible for the
drawing, you need to send an email with your email
address and the code number to rlachaus@csusb.eatu. This
information will be linked to your survey responses in
every way. The researcher will contact the winner of the
drawing via email at the end of the study.
If you have read and understand the above statements, please
click on the ‘Continue' button below to indicate your
consent to participate in this study.
* 1. I acknowledge that I have read and understand the
purpose and nature of this study and freely consent to
participate in the study. I also acknowledge that I am
at least 11 years of age.
If you have read and understand the above statements, please
click the "Continue" button below to indicate your consent
to participate in this study and then click on "NEXT".
CONTINUE
Why do you post/read this newsgroup? How often do you
post/read this newsgroup?
BITE ME
On 5/19/04 9:38 PM, in article
152f6cbe.0405192038.3405733c@posting.google.com, "Ronde
Champ" <rondechamp@aol.com> wrote:
> Motivations of RBR Poster's Survey
>
> 1. Motivation of RBR Poster's Survey
>
>
> Motivation of RBR Poster's Survey
>
>
>
> The study in which you are being asked to participate
> in is designed to investigate various reasons why
> cyclists post and participate in cycling newsgroups.
> This study is interested in all types of people who
> internet bike. There are no right or wrong answers to
> this survey. This study is being conducted by Robert
> LaShoes in the Department of Heath Science and Humane
> Ecology at California State Penal University, San
> Bernardhino (CSUSB). The Institutional Review Bored
> (IRB) at CSUSB has reviewed and approved this study.
>
> Your participation in this study will consist of
> filling out a brief survey online. The survey takes
> about 109 minutes to complete. All information will not
> remain completely confidential. This means that
> identifying information will be linked to your
> responses. We are interested in newsgroup data only.
> This survey is involuntary. You do have to participate
> in this study and may not stop at any time. At the end
> of the survey, you will be asked if you would like to
> submit your responses. If you choose not participate in
> this study, you will be penalized in every way.
>
> In time will the information you provide be linked to
> your personal information. If you have any questions or
> comments on this study, please contact Robert LaShoes
> at rlachaus@csusb.eatu. A copy of findings from this
> study will be available in December 2024 by contacting
> Robert G. LaShoes at rlachaus@csusb.eatu.
>
> As a way of thanking you for your participation, you
> will be eligible to win a $2500 gift certificate to
> Excel Sport. If you choose to complete the survey, a
> code number will be available. In order to be eligible
> for the drawing, you need to send an email with your
> email address and the code number to
> rlachaus@csusb.eatu. This information will be linked to
> your survey responses in every way. The researcher will
> contact the winner of the drawing via email at the end
> of the study.
>
> If you have read and understand the above statements,
> please click on the Å’Continue' button below to indicate
> your consent to participate in this study.
>
>
>
> * 1. I acknowledge that I have read and understand the
> purpose and nature of this study and freely consent to
> participate in the study. I also acknowledge that I am
> at least 11 years of age.
>
> If you have read and understand the above statements,
> please click the "Continue" button below to indicate
> your consent to participate in this study and then click
> on "NEXT".
>
>
> CONTINUE
>
>
>
> Why do you post/read this newsgroup? How often do you
> post/read this newsgroup?
in article 152f6cbe.0405192038.3405733c@posting.google.com, Ronde Champ at
rondechamp@aol.com wrote on 5/19/04 9:38 PM:
> Why do you post/read this newsgroup? How often do you
> post/read this newsgroup?
1. For the purpose of a little bit of socializing/discussion
about a topic I have come to feel very enthusiastic about
in the past two years. I had never really been a sports
fan before this, but it proved to be just a matter of
finding "my" sport.
Why RBR? Having accepted the fact that discussion on the
Internet produces trolling and flames as a matter of course,
I have found that I prefer the Usenet style of doing so over
any other. There's also the fact that it's text only, which
leaves non-wordsmiths (to be VERY kind) at a distinct
disadvantage.
2. I read and post whenever I'm home, usually during
study/practice breaks.
-Sonarrat.
Ronde Champ wrote:
> Motivations of RBR Poster's Survey
[snip] Geez that was long, what did it say? I don't have the
attention span for posts that long.
Sonarrat <mynick@nospam.hotmail> wrote in message news:<BCD18BF8.3533%mynick@nospam.hotmail>...
> in article
> 152f6cbe.0405192038.3405733c@posting.google.com, Ronde
> Champ at rondechamp@aol.com wrote on 5/19/04 9:38 PM:
>
> > Why do you post/read this newsgroup? How often do you
> > post/read this newsgroup?
>
> 1. For the purpose of a little bit of
> socializing/discussion about a topic I have come to
> feel very enthusiastic about in the past two years. I
> had never really been a sports fan before this, but it
> proved to be just a matter of finding "my" sport.
Actually there is a whole lot less flaming and trolls on
this group than in the vast majority of other usenet groups.
If Trdina, Chang and Albright stay away there are only those
who are irritated by just one or two others that respond
poorly. For instance, Greg?
> Why RBR? Having accepted the fact that discussion on the
> Internet produces trolling and flames as a matter of
> course, I have found that I prefer the Usenet style of
> doing so over any other. There's also the fact that it's
> text only, which leaves non-wordsmiths (to be VERY kind)
> at a distinct disadvantage.
Do you believe that limits the amount of reparte'?
Sonarrat <mynick@nospam.hotmail> wrote in message news:<BCD18BF8.3533%mynick@nospam.hotmail>...
> in article
> 152f6cbe.0405192038.3405733c@posting.google.com, Ronde
> Champ at rondechamp@aol.com wrote on 5/19/04 9:38 PM:
>
> > Why do you post/read this newsgroup? How often do you
> > post/read this newsgroup?
>
> 1. For the purpose of a little bit of
> socializing/discussion about a topic I have come to
> feel very enthusiastic about in the past two years. I
> had never really been a sports fan before this, but it
> proved to be just a matter of finding "my" sport.
Actually there is a whole lot less flaming and trolls on
this group than in the vast majority of other usenet groups.
If Trdina, Chang and Albright stay away there are only those
who are irritated by just one or two others that respond
poorly. For instance, Greg?
> Why RBR? Having accepted the fact that discussion on the
> Internet produces trolling and flames as a matter of
> course, I have found that I prefer the Usenet style of
> doing so over any other. There's also the fact that it's
> text only, which leaves non-wordsmiths (to be VERY kind)
> at a distinct disadvantage.
Do you believe that limits the amount of reparte'?
in article 484e7721.0405201153.4c1aa9a1@posting.google.com, Tom Kunich at
cyclintom@yahoo.com wrote on 5/20/04 12:53 PM:
> Sonarrat <mynick@nospam.hotmail> wrote in message
> news:<BCD18BF8.3533%mynick@nospam.hotmail>...
>> in article
>> 152f6cbe.0405192038.3405733c@posting.google.com, Ronde
>> Champ at rondechamp@aol.com wrote on 5/19/04 9:38 PM:
>>
>>> Why do you post/read this newsgroup? How often do you
>>> post/read this newsgroup?
>>
>> 1. For the purpose of a little bit of
>> socializing/discussion about a topic I have come to
>> feel very enthusiastic about in the past two years. I
>> had never really been a sports fan before this, but it
>> proved to be just a matter of finding "my" sport.
>
> Actually there is a whole lot less flaming and trolls on
> this group than in the vast majority of other usenet
> groups. If Trdina, Chang and Albright stay away there are
> only those who are irritated by just one or two others
> that respond poorly. For instance, Greg?
That's a conditional statement, and trolls tend to be
remarkably persistent. But it's balanced out by a good deal
of genuine insight.
>> Why RBR? Having accepted the fact that discussion on the
>> Internet produces trolling and flames as a matter of
>> course, I have found that I prefer the Usenet style of
>> doing so over any other. There's also the fact that it's
>> text only, which leaves non-wordsmiths (to be VERY kind)
>> at a distinct disadvantage.
>
> Do you believe that limits the amount of reparte'?
In a word, no. People without words also tend to be without
ideas, although there are certainly people with words who
have no idea.
-Sonarrat.
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by
vBSEO 3.3.0
