PDA

View Full Version : Race Report: NY Mini 10K












Race Report: NY Mini 10K





Westendgirl
  
"Oh my god!!"

Words that escaped my mouth several times after I crossed
the finish line of this, my first 10K. I was hoping for a
good race-and did that, and then some.

I was coming off a mildly disappointing Corporate Challenge
on Wednesday-done in the disgusting 90+ degree weather, I
did it in 30:49-still pretty good considering the weather,
not the sub-30 I was hoping for-I totally bombed the first
mile due to the overcrowding (splits
10:03/8:24/8:19/4:03.) So I decided to cut my losses and aim
for running a good Mini.

Now, based on my previous race times, I figured around an
8:30-8:45 pace for a 10K would be realistic, if I could get
low 8's it would be fabulous. The weather was perfect for
racing-low 70's and very low humidity. There's this whole
"girl power" vibe in the air. Additionally, this was the
first race I was affiliated with my running club, so I was a
little more motivated to run a good race. Somehow-everything
just came together today.

Mile 1 starts up Central Park West-pretty much
flat...teensiest bit of a hill-but child's play compared to
the park. I was afraid of doing this mile too fast, so I ran
it at a pace that felt pretty comfortable. Imagine my shock
when I hit the first mile marker in 7:36. It freaked me out
a little bit, so I slowed it down a little bit for mile 2,
which I did in 7:57.

Then came the difficult part-the northern hills. Mile 3
included an uphill and then a big downhill, which I did
pretty well on-hitting mile 3 in 7:58 and the 5K point at
24:41. Then came mile 4 and the steepest uphill of the
course, and even a coupla more minor uphills. Mile 4 was my
slowest at
11:22, but no worries-it was a tough mile and I knew the
worst of it was over.

Then it hit me: unless I screwed up big time, I was gonna
sub-50 this baby. And I didn't screw up. Mile 5 had Cat Hill
going downhill-hit that in
11:1...mile 6 around the bottom of the park clocked in at
7:42. With the finish line in sight, I gave that last
.2 mile my all and finished that in
12:39-for a finishing time of 48:59!!! (average pace 7:54) I
must have said "Oh my God" at least 10 times after I finished-
I was still in disbelief that I did this!!

I'm still trying to figure out exactly how it
happened...maybe consistency is just paying off. Or I had a
bit of a taper this week-rested Tuesday, Thursday and
Friday due to doing 2 races, so I was really good to go for
today. Or maybe this is my reward for suffering through
Wednesday. :)

But seriously, after a kick-ass performance like today, I'm
really looking forward to what's to come with my racing-be
it this year, the next and further on down the line.

-Lara
:)

--
"If God is a DJ...life is a dance floor... you get what
you're given...it's all how you use it..."

Joe Positive
  
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:56:12 GMT, "WestEndGirl" <l@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

>"Oh my god!!"
>
>Words that escaped my mouth several times after I crossed
>the finish line of this, my first 10K. I was hoping for a
>good race-and did that, and then some.

[swell report of a swell race went here]

>Then it hit me: unless I screwed up big time, I was gonna
>sub-50 this baby. And I didn't screw up. Mile 5 had Cat
>Hill going downhill-hit that in
>7:45...mile 6 around the bottom of the park clocked in at
> 7:42. With the finish line in sight, I gave that last
> .2 mile my all and finished that in
>1:39-for a finishing time of 48:59!!! (average pace 7:54) I
> must have said "Oh my God" at least 10 times after I finished-
> I was still in disbelief that I did this!!

Very nicely done! It took me about 2 years to beat 50 in a
10K, and here you've done it your very first time out. It
sounds as if this was a real breakthrough race for you.
Have you changed your training any since joining the
running club?

Karen

Westendgirl
  
> Very nicely done!
Many thanks, Karen!!

> It took me about 2 years to beat 50 in a 10K, and
> here you've done it your very first time out.
I'm still in shock!! LOL I'm glad I waited a few races
before I attempted one. Actually-my first race of the year
was originally gonna be a 5K at the beginning of April, but
NYRR scrapped the 5K and changed it to a 10K, so I nixed
that in favor making my race debut in a 4-miler a coupla
weeks later. But I guess this proves that good things come
to those who wait-if I started racing last year, I know I
wouldn't have been able to run these speeds-2004 was truly
the right time to start.

>It sounds as if this was a real breakthrough race for you.
>Have you changed your training any since joining the
>running club?
>
Basically, more running, less cross-training. I *think*
that might have been the case anyway, especially in these
warmer months. But when you have more people to run with,
it's a great motivator :) One change I've recently made-now
when I do the entire 6-mile loop of the park now-I do it
from a different starting position than I do for the 4 or
5-mile loop so I can do the northern hills near the
beginning of my run as opposed to the end. Need to keep
working on those in prep for 10Ks, some 5-milers, and half-
marathons that utilize the park. If I save those for the
end, I get too tempted to cut the 6-mile loop down to 5 :)
It helped yesterday-only losing 20-30 seconds on the worst
hill of the race and still being able to have the 2nd 5K of
the race as a negative split! (Only by 18 seconds, but I'll
take it. :) ) -Lara
:)

--
"If God is a DJ...life is a dance floor... you get what
you're given...it's all how you use it..."

Phil M.
  
"WestEndGirl" <l@nyc.rr.com> wrote in
news:0_Kyc.178385$WA4.94761@twister.nyc.rr.com:

> "Oh my god!!"

A great performance! I enjoyed your report.

Phil M.

--
"I gotta go. You're killin' me."

Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish