hortyy
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-cycling-ullrich-53
Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
View Full Version : Jan at 120 kgs?
leif_ericson
>Originally posted by hortyy
>
>Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Heavy? No
Pantani weighed 130kg
Armstrong weighs 140kg
The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
>
>Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Heavy? No
Pantani weighed 130kg
Armstrong weighs 140kg
The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
Tim Lines
hortyy@rogers.ca wrote:
> ws.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-
> cycling-ullrich-53
>
> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Makes him faster on descents.
--
--------------------
Remove CLOTHES to reply
> ws.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-
> cycling-ullrich-53
>
> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Makes him faster on descents.
--
--------------------
Remove CLOTHES to reply
John Forrest To
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 02:01:38 GMT, hortyy@rogers.ca wrote:
>ews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-
>cycling-ullrich-53
>
>Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Yeah, everyone knows he's down to 95kg now.
JT
>ews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-
>cycling-ullrich-53
>
>Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Yeah, everyone knows he's down to 95kg now.
JT
Chris And Mary
It has to be a joke 120kgs = 264 lbs.
Jan still has a sense of humour about his ability to pack it
on in the off season.
<hortyy@rogers.ca> wrote in message
news:em1qc01ikti1q36dp9hos29a72psd28js6@4ax.com...
>
news.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-
cycling-ullrich-53
>
> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Jan still has a sense of humour about his ability to pack it
on in the off season.
<hortyy@rogers.ca> wrote in message
news:em1qc01ikti1q36dp9hos29a72psd28js6@4ax.com...
>
news.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/germany/stage1/ger-
cycling-ullrich-53
>
> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
Marlene Blansha
"Chris and Mary Cuylle" <cuylle@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:rg8zc.238801$Ar.237467@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> It has to be a joke 120kgs = 264 lbs.
>
> Jan still has a sense of humour about his ability to pack
> it on in the off season.
>
>
>
> <hortyy@rogers.ca> wrote in message
> news:em1qc01ikti1q36dp9hos29a72psd28js6@4ax.com...
> >
>
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/-
germany/stage1/ge r-cycling-ullrich-53
> >
> > Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
>
Pantani weighed 130 LB, not KG! If he weighed 130kg, he'd
have been a defensive tackle!
news:rg8zc.238801$Ar.237467@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> It has to be a joke 120kgs = 264 lbs.
>
> Jan still has a sense of humour about his ability to pack
> it on in the off season.
>
>
>
> <hortyy@rogers.ca> wrote in message
> news:em1qc01ikti1q36dp9hos29a72psd28js6@4ax.com...
> >
>
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2004/may04/-
germany/stage1/ge r-cycling-ullrich-53
> >
> > Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
>
Pantani weighed 130 LB, not KG! If he weighed 130kg, he'd
have been a defensive tackle!
Steve
On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com,
"leif_ericson" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>> Originally posted by hortyy
>>
>> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
>
> Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg The
> reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost
> amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much
> weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
>
>
What?!?!?
A kg = 2.2lbs
Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
"leif_ericson" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>> Originally posted by hortyy
>>
>> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
>
> Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg The
> reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost
> amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much
> weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
>
>
What?!?!?
A kg = 2.2lbs
Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
Sonarrat
"Steve" <sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BCF26010.2361D%sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net...
> On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article
> i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com,
> "leif_ericson" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>
> >> Originally posted by hortyy
> >>
> >> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
> >
> > Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg
> > The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost
> > amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much
> > weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
> >
> >
> What?!?!?
>
> A kg = 2.2lbs
>
> Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
Of course. Bicycle racers are second only to sumo wrestlers.
All that energy has to come from somewhere.
-Sonarrat.
news:BCF26010.2361D%sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net...
> On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article
> i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com,
> "leif_ericson" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>
> >> Originally posted by hortyy
> >>
> >> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
> >
> > Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg
> > The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost
> > amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much
> > weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
> >
> >
> What?!?!?
>
> A kg = 2.2lbs
>
> Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
Of course. Bicycle racers are second only to sumo wrestlers.
All that energy has to come from somewhere.
-Sonarrat.
Michael
"Sonarrat" <sonarrat@postmark.fishn..> wrote in message news:10cq53jrlnnao1d@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Steve" <sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:BCF26010.2361D%sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net...
> > On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article
> > i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com,
> > "leif_ericson" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Originally posted by hortyy
> > >>
> > >> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
> > >
> > > Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg
> > > The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an
> > > almost amazing statistic... showing that he has lost
> > > so much weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
> > >
> > >
> > What?!?!?
> >
> > A kg = 2.2lbs
> >
> > Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
>
> Of course. Bicycle racers are second only to sumo
> wrestlers. All that energy has to come from somewhere.
>
> -Sonarrat.
Big bones, as they say.
M.
>
> "Steve" <sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:BCF26010.2361D%sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net...
> > On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article
> > i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com,
> > "leif_ericson" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Originally posted by hortyy
> > >>
> > >> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
> > >
> > > Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg
> > > The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an
> > > almost amazing statistic... showing that he has lost
> > > so much weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
> > >
> > >
> > What?!?!?
> >
> > A kg = 2.2lbs
> >
> > Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
>
> Of course. Bicycle racers are second only to sumo
> wrestlers. All that energy has to come from somewhere.
>
> -Sonarrat.
Big bones, as they say.
M.
Callistus Valer
> Jan still has a sense of humour about his ability to pack
> it on in the off season.
I've read he now varies between 190 and 205 lbs.
> it on in the off season.
I've read he now varies between 190 and 205 lbs.
John Forrest To
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 02:48:34 GMT, Steve <sdsteve@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article
>i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com, "leif_ericson"
><usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>
>>> Originally posted by hortyy
>>>
>>> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
>>
>> Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg
>> The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost
>> amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much
>> weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
>>
>>
>What?!?!?
>
>A kg = 2.2lbs
>
>Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
Approximately, but it's all muscle and lungs, so it's all
good.
JT
wrote:
>On 6/13/04 7:32 PM, in article
>i78zc.59842$1o3.48897@fe04.usenetserver.com, "leif_ericson"
><usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>
>>> Originally posted by hortyy
>>>
>>> Says he weighs 120 kgs? Sounds a bit heavy...
>>
>> Heavy? No Pantani weighed 130kg Armstrong weighs 140kg
>> The reason they specified 120kg is that it is an almost
>> amazing statistic... showing that he has lost so much
>> weight, he is lighter than the climbers!
>>
>>
>What?!?!?
>
>A kg = 2.2lbs
>
>Are you saying LA weighs 300lbs??
Approximately, but it's all muscle and lungs, so it's all
good.
JT
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0