About Cycling Forums
Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets
Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.
John Rogerson
Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C45EB1.CF4F7590 Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money to
waste as I = want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no need
to change them but it = does mean that I can fork out for
some peripheral gear that I wouldn't = normally spend much
money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.
I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
sunnies but they = really don't suit me. I want the
changeable lens facility for different = light conditions.
How do the Half Jackets measure up for cycle use? I also
do a fair bit = of running and they would be used for
that as well.
Opinions appreciated.
Cheers ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C45EB1.CF4F7590 Content-
Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-
Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-
Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META
content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm lucky enough to have
come into a = little bit of=20 money to waste as I
want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no need
= to=20 change them but it does mean that I can fork
out for some peripheral = gear that I=20 wouldn't
normally spend much money on. A pair of Oakleys
is on the =
list.</FONT></DIV>
<DV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DVI><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I know the M frames are
meant to be the = ultimate=20 sports sunnies but they
really don't suit me. I want the = changeable
lens=20 facility for different light
conditions.</FONT></DIV>
<DVII><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DVIII><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>How do the Half Jackets
measure up for = cycle use?=20 I also do a fair
bit of running and they would be used for that as =
well.</FONT></DIV>
<DIX><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DX><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Opinions
appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
<DXI><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DXII><FONT face=3DArial
size=3D2>Cheers</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C45EB1.CF4F7590--
Michael Press
Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets
"John Rogerson" <johndrogerson@ns.yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money to
>waste as I want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no need
>to change them but it does mean that I can fork out for
>some peripheral gear that I wouldn't normally spend much
>money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.
>
>I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
>sunnies but they really don't suit me. I want the
>changeable lens facility for different light conditions.
>
You can change the lenses in M frames. Oakley even makes a
case for that holds the sunglasses and an extra lens.
I've used my M's for cycling for several years now. They're
simply incredible.
Michael
Steve Niece
Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets
I know this doesn't really answer your questions, I just
wanted to put in my .02 about Oakleys. I've had 1 pair of
Frogskins, 1 pair of M frames, and 3 pairs of Jackets that
ended up with broken frames. All of the frames were
'crystal' (translucent colour) so that may be a
contributing factor.
The story I heard (not from Oakley) was that the plastic in
Oakley frames does not stand up well to the combination of
sweat and sunscreen. All of the cracks developed in the top
of the frames, just above one of the lenses, and the frames
had not been abused (sat on, stepped on, etc.) I've since
switched to Rudy Projects, and haven't had a problem since.
PLUS, if the lenses ever scratch, for any reason, Rudy will
replace them.
I'm not trying to disuade you from Oakleys, while they held
together, they were great sunglasses, just relating my
experiences.
Steve
John Rogerson wrote:
> I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money
> to waste as I want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no
> need to change them but it does mean that I can fork out
> for some peripheral gear that I wouldn't normally spend
> much money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.
>
> I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
> sunnies but they really don't suit me. I want the
> changeable lens facility for different light conditions.
>
> How do the Half Jackets measure up for cycle use? I also
> do a fair bit of running and they would be used for that
> as well.
>
> Opinions appreciated.
>
> Cheers
Dion Dock
Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets
You can change the lenses on M frames. Do not get the type
that have folding sides like regular glasses. I was breaking
one pair/year due to lots of little cracks as described
below. At first, Oakley would replace them for free, then
they started charging $15. I finally got mad at them and
sold all my lenses.
I like the M frames better than the Half Jackets because
the latter have frames that create a blind spot in my
peripheral vision.
That said, I'm thinking about getting some of the non-
folding Ms again. The gray lens works really well in all
light conditions.
-Dion
"Steve Niece" <partialguide@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:XsAEc.174924$207.1238686@news20.bellglobal.com...
> I know this doesn't really answer your questions, I just
> wanted to put in my .02 about Oakleys. I've had 1 pair of
> Frogskins, 1 pair of M frames, and 3 pairs of Jackets that
> ended up with broken frames. All of the frames were
> 'crystal' (translucent colour) so that may be a
> contributing factor.
>
> The story I heard (not from Oakley) was that the plastic
> in Oakley frames does not stand up well to the combination
> of sweat and sunscreen. All of the cracks developed in the
> top of the frames, just above one of the lenses, and the
> frames had not been abused (sat on, stepped on, etc.) I've
> since switched to Rudy Projects, and haven't had a problem
> since. PLUS, if the lenses ever scratch, for any reason,
> Rudy will replace them.
>
> I'm not trying to disuade you from Oakleys, while they
> held together, they were great sunglasses, just relating
> my experiences.
>
> Steve
>
> John Rogerson wrote:
> > I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money
> > to waste as I want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no
> > need to change them but it does mean that I can fork out
> > for some peripheral gear that I wouldn't normally spend
> > much money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.
> >
> > I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
> > sunnies but they really don't suit me. I want the
> > changeable lens facility for different light conditions.
> >
> > How do the Half Jackets measure up for cycle use? I also
> > do a fair bit of running and they would be used for that
> > as well.
> >
> > Opinions appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers
Jim Flom
Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets
"Steve Niece" wrote...
> I know this doesn't really answer your questions, I just
> wanted to put in my .02 about Oakleys. I've had 1 pair of
> Frogskins, 1 pair of M frames, and 3 pairs of Jackets that
> ended up with broken frames. All of the frames were
> 'crystal' (translucent colour) so that may be a
> contributing factor.
>
> The story I heard (not from Oakley) was that the plastic
> in Oakley frames does not stand up well to the combination
> of sweat and sunscreen.
I'd heard rumours about Oakleys too. HOWEVER. I have not
found that to be the case in the two or three years I've had
my M-frames. In addition, Oakley has a first-rate
warranty/replacement policy. My daughter decided to remove
my M-frames for me one day, cracking the housing where the
bow (ear-piece) joins the main frame. I sent it back (got
contact info here in rbr in fact), paid a $15 handling
charge, and received new(?) frame (at least it looks and
acts like new). They've been great.
JF
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.