Todd Gastaldo
$25,000 FOR OC CHIROS FOR DISNEYLAND ANTIFLUORIDATION WORK?
See the end of PS2 below...
SOME ATTORNEYS ARE VERY POWERFUL FLUORIDATORS...
FOR EXAMPLE, ATTORNEY FRANK L. SEAMANS AND THE FLUORINE
LAWYERS COMMITTEE. See the very end of this post.
MICHAEL J. SCHROEDER MAY BE THE MOST INFLUENTIAL ATTORNEY IN
CHIROPRACTIC
I AM HOPING MR. SCHROEDER WILL HELP STOP FLUORIDATION OF
DISNEYLAND
"[W]e won't let our [malpractice liability insurance]
carrier tell you how to practice chiropractic." --Attorney
Michael J. Schroeder's National Chiropractic Council
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)
Attorney Michael J. Schroeder Vice President and General
Counsel National Chiropractic Council 1851 East First
Street, Suite 1160 Santa Ana, California 92705
(800) 622-6869 info@chiropracticcouncil.com
Mike,
I'm sending the $25,000 I owe you.
I'm hoping you'll forgive interest and court costs I owe
you.
Actually Mike, I'm hoping you'll send my $25,000 check
back to me.
I'd like to donate that $25,000 to the Orange County
Chiropractic District for the purpose of mobilizing doctors
of chiropractic to help stop fluoridation of Disneyland - or
any other purpose they designate.
See the end of PS2 below.
Thanks,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo todd@chiromotion.com
PS1 Some facts regarding The National Chiropractic
Council...
"...the nation's oldest chiropractic risk purchasing group."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
"...the best malpractice claims defense specialists in the
country."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/legal_defense.html
"...never lost a trial or an arbitration..."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
"...never settled a claim without the consent of our
chiropractor."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/legal_defense.html
"...Vice President and General Counsel, Michael Schroeder,
was named 1996 Chiropractic Attorney of the Year by the
National Association of Chiropractic Attorneys."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/legal_defense.html
PS2 Mike, you sued me for one million dollars - for libel -
as I worked to stop OBs from closing birth canals up to 30%
and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines...
You sued me for one million dollars as I was working to save
tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral
subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand.
You said you would make the lawsuit go away for $1,000
dollars. You demanded that I sign obvious lies. I refused. I
still have those papers you faxed and mailed. I spent $2,000-
plus trying to get the trial moved to Oregon. I failed. You
won a default judgement in the amount of $25,000 dollars.
The merits of the case were never argued.
I thought of your one million dollar libel suit against me
when I read on your (NCC) website:
"[W]e won't let our [malpractice liability insurance]
carrier tell you how to practice chiropractic."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
Mike, YOU told the chiropractic profession in California how
to practice chiropractic (Rule 302).
You wrote Rule 302 then "defended" it when 10 MD-
obstetricians sued.
You "won" and 10 MD-obstetricians "lost" and you and the 10
MD-obstetricians in effect got your Rule 302 judicially
rubberstamped.
Under your Rule 302, California DCs who once attended
thousands of homebirths could no longer sever umbilical
cords - but MD-obstetricians could still sever SPINAL NERVES
- that is - MD-obstetricians could still close birth canals
up to 30% and manipulate babies' spines so hard that they
sometimes severed spinal nerves.
MD-obstetricians are STILL closing birth canals up to 30%
and manipulating babies' spines so hard that they sometimes
sever spinal nerves.
You are a prominent "chiropractic" attorney Mike - you were
voted "Attorney of the Year" by the National Association of
Chiropractic Attorneys...
You won your $25,000 default judgement - but have you done
ANYTHING to stop the obvious spinal manipulation crime of
MD-obstetricians?
As I've repeatedly noted publicly, with birth canals
senselessly closed up to 30%, MD-obstetricians are violently
pushing on tiny spines (with oxytocin and Cytotec) and
gruesomely pulling (with hands, forceps and vacuums)...
I've also repeatedly noted publicly that MD-obstetricians
are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine
episiotomy") - surgically/fraudlently inferring they are
doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.
AND I've repeatedly noted publicly that MD-obstetricians
are slicing ABDOMENS en mass (euphemism "c-section") -
surgically/fraudulently inferring they have DONE
everything possible to open birth canals even as they
close birth canals.
These are MASSIVE MD crimes - one is obviously pertinent to
chiropractic - the gruesome spinal manipulation of most
babies, Mike. Have you done ANYTHING to stop them?
In the early 90s, presumably based on your Rule 302, a man
calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the
California Board of Chiropractic Examiners told me that it
was outside my scope of practice to tell pregnant women that
OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%.
I think that man was you, Mike.
I think you were working for the 10 MD-obstetricians who
sued the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners.
I think MD-obstetricians saw the writing on their birth
monopoly wall as CNMwives got the right to slice vaginas.
CNMwives got this right **by slicing vaginas** then going to
the legislature and legislatively gaining an increase in
their scope of practice: the right to slice vaginas...
Thanks to California CNMwives, by law, episiotomy is now
part of "normal birth." As indicated above, most
episiotomies are obviously illegal:
(Sorry to repeat myself but) Aping their (former?) MD-
obstetrician masters/supervisors, CNMwives are slicing
vaginas - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing
everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they
CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%. BTW, MD-obstetricians
benefitted from this new CNMwifery practice right because
their most frequent surgical behavior toward women - an
obvious crime - is now by law part of "normal birth.")
What I'm getting at here, Mike, is that **even if your Rule
302 is right** - even if California DCs should not have been
attending thousands of homebirths all those years - there is
a way to gain practice rights just by doing - then going to
the legislature - just like the CNMwives did with
episiotomy.
But I still think your Rule 302 is wrong Mike. I think
California DCs have the right to attend births - even
without the extra training idea of Attorney David
Prescott...
See Rule 302, Birth and Trigon/Anthem (Glasscock) - and
ACOG's Willett LeHew, MD http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2252
See also: Tain, BPI and the Schroeder/Rule 302 matter... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2365
PLEASE NOTE: I am NOT saying I think DCs should start
attending births again - there are plenty of homebirth
midwives - though currently they are being ham-strung by the
obstetricians' "physician supervisor" game...
Bottomline Mike, I think the 10 MD-obstetricians were
SUPPOSED to "lose" to you - to get your Rule 302 judicially
rubberstamped - to get doctors of chiropractic to only
think about treating pregnant women's spines before and
after birth.
This latter notion - DCs having nothing to do with birth -
appears in your Rule 302 and in the American Chiropractic
Association's LAME advice for pregnant women.
See Pregnant? ACA MAKES A GOOD POINT! (but unfortunately...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2641
ACA makes NO MENTION of the white elephant fact that OBs are
knowingly closing birth canals - even though PLENTY of ACA
folks (Bob Dubin and Jim Edwards spring to mind) know I have
been writing about this for years.
I think MD-obstetricians have LONG been afraid that
doctors of chiropractic would discover that MD-
obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators -
more specifically they are BABY manipulators - and
gruesome baby manipulators at that.
I think the medical game may be: "Hammer chiros for
causing strokes with spinal manipulation and they won't
dare expose medicine's stroke-causing spinal manipulation
crime against babies."
MDs very likely fear exposure of the very real possibility
that their routine GRUESOME spinal manipulation is causing
strokes in babies...
According to Nelson [2002]:
"Stroke in infants and children is an important cause of
morbidity and mortality..." --Karin B. Nelson, MD, NINDS
(Lynch et al. Pediatrics 2002 Jan;109(1):116-23]
See also: Strokes in babies! (also: WFC Pres. Paul F. Carey,
DC) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2275
And see Pran Manga and strokes in babies... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2634
Mike, I think you are protecting MD-obstetricians and their
horrible massive spinal manipulation crime against babies.
I think that's why you've done nothing to stop the spinal
manipulation crime of MDs since winning your $25,000 default
judgement.
I hope I am wrong about this. I hope you have been working
to help the tiniest chiropractic patients...
Regardless...
I am *hoping* you will do four things Mike:
1. Publicly state that you are no longer holding that
$25,000 dollar judgement against me and send my check
back to me.
2. Publicly encourage Disneyland DA Tony Rackauckas
to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals
and gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating
babies' spines.
3. Publicly encourage Disneyland DA Tony Rackauckas to stop
public officials from dumping toxic phosphate fertilizer
waste (hydrofluorosilicic acid/"fluoride") into
Disneyland drinking water.
4. Publicly encourage Disneyland DA Tony to get on the
stick so that by the time Prof. Paul Connett's 1st
Citizens' Conference on Fluoride rolls around, he (Tony)
can be in New York as a featured surprise guest speaker
- to tell everyone how he detoxified Disneyland's
drinking water.
If your wife Susan Kang Schroeder (who is Tony's deputy DA
and spokeswoman) properly handles the media, it is possible
that MANY DAs from across the country could have their
drinking water systems detoxified by the time Prof.
Connett's 1st Citizens' Conference on Fluoride rolls around.
You and your wife could ALSO help Disneyland DA Tony save
tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative
vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to
adjust by hand.
AND MIKE... You will want to alert the doctors of
chiropractic whose malpractice insurance you handle that, in
high fluoride areas especially, relatively young people who
have been drinking lots of fluoridated water may be
unknowingly contracting "crippling skeletal fluorosis" -
this according to the National Academy of Sciences.
"Crippling skeletal fluorosis" may contraindicate some forms
of spinal manipulation.
For details regardinig fluoridation causing "crippling
skeletal fluorosis", see The Fluoride Deception by
Christopher Bryson [NY: Seven Stories Press. 2004:
last chapter]
BTW, my quotes and paraphrases from The Fluoride Deception
may be found
Ds...
1. Disneyland's toxic drinking water (also: Bizarre Irish
fluoride blarney) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2636
2. Tiny babies/Toxic fluoride... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2640
MANY good things could come from you doing the four things
I'm hoping you'll
Dt.
As alluded to above, if you send my $25,000 check back to
me, I will give $25,000 to the Orange County Chiropractic
District to help DCs help DA Tony stop fluoridation at
Disneyland - or for any other purpose they designate.
PS3 Your (NCC) website says,
"our insurance carrier must provide top quality financial
credentials."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
Who IS your insurance carrier Mike?
Malpractice liability insurance carriers should be informed
that MD-obstetricians are knowingly closing birth canals and
gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most babies'
spines at birth.
Perhaps malpractice liability insurance carriers greatly
fear putting out this information? Perhaps THEY control what
is - and what is not said - in birth trauma trials?
To my knowledge, not ONE birth trauma attorney has told a
jury that MD-obstetricians are closing birth canals.
This is happening in cases where "cephalopelvic
disproportion" is mentioned; that is, birth trauma attorneys
are letting OB defendants' and their attorneys blame BABIES
for having big heads (the "cephalo" part of cephalopelvic
disproportion) - as they IGNORE the fact that defendant OBs
are making the PELVIS smaller!
It's the DAMNDEST thing, Mike!
Please tell your insurance carrier that MD-obstetricians are
knowingly closing birth canals, etc.
PS4 THE FLUORINE LAWYERS COMMITTEE...
San Diego, CA (April 19, 2004) -- American Specialty Health
Networks (ASH Networks), the nation's leading complementary
health care organization, is pleased to announce a new
provider initiative-the Value-Added Program. Effective
April 1, 2004, ASH providers can now receive discounts of
up to 40 percent on professional malpractice insurance and
other products and services..."We're pleased to offer ASH
providers significant savings on malpractice liability
insurance," said Phillip Stump, President of Allied
Professionals and the National Chiropractic Council. http:-
//www.ashnetworks.com/NewsPress/Content/Articles/2004/p_ap-
r192004.asp
Mike, will you cc this to NCC President Phillip Stump?
Didn't Kurt Hegetschweiler, DC used to be an ASH mucky-muck?
My recollection is the Kurt was president of the
California Chiropractic Association back around the time
CCA made you an honorary member after your Rule 302 work
(or was it before).
I think CCA sold a pound of chiropractic flesh out the back
door by having you write Rule 302.
It's cool that you were free to jump to the Calif. Chiro
Board to defend your Rule 302 when 10 MD-obstetricians sued
and in effect helped you get your Rule 302 judicially
rubberstamped.
After that, a man calling himself Michael Schroeder,
attorney for the California Chiropractic Board told me it
was outside my scope of practice to tell pregnant women that
OBs are closing birth canals...
That was NOT cool.
Mike, if you pick up a copy of The Fluoride Deception, in
the glossy photo section, there is a photo of "Frank L.
Seamans, leading attorney representing the Aluminum Company
of America, and head of the Fluorine Lawyers Committee."
Attorneys are powerful people - clever people.
But I don't think ANYONE - attorney or otherwise - has a
right to remain silent as babies are poisoned and babies
are gruesomely manipulated - as OBs knowingly close
birth canals.
These are massive "healthcare" abominations, Mike.
Please use your formidable political power to help to
stop them.
I hope you'll do the four things enumerated above and send
my $25,000 check back to me.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Todd
Du. Gastaldo todd@chiromotion.com
Copied to: Orange County Chiropractic District President Bea
Heller, DC DrHeller@BeaHellerDC.com - and other Orange
County DCs...
Copied to: Orange County DA Tony Rackauckas
tony.rackauckas@da.ocgov.com
Orange County chiropractic physicians: I STRONGLY SUSPECT
MASS CHILD ABUSE IS OCCURRING: 1) Mass involuntary
medication by public officials - obviously the illegal
practice of medicine; and 2) mass gruesome spinal
manipulation by MDs - also obviously the illegal practice of
medicine. It is mandatory to report suspected child abuse.
Perhaps with "chiropractic" Atty Schroeder being so close to
Disneyland DA Tony - your suspected child abuse reports will
not be ignored like mine have been.
One last note: I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs.
MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this
culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder - medical school.
See the end of PS2 below...
SOME ATTORNEYS ARE VERY POWERFUL FLUORIDATORS...
FOR EXAMPLE, ATTORNEY FRANK L. SEAMANS AND THE FLUORINE
LAWYERS COMMITTEE. See the very end of this post.
MICHAEL J. SCHROEDER MAY BE THE MOST INFLUENTIAL ATTORNEY IN
CHIROPRACTIC
I AM HOPING MR. SCHROEDER WILL HELP STOP FLUORIDATION OF
DISNEYLAND
"[W]e won't let our [malpractice liability insurance]
carrier tell you how to practice chiropractic." --Attorney
Michael J. Schroeder's National Chiropractic Council
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)
Attorney Michael J. Schroeder Vice President and General
Counsel National Chiropractic Council 1851 East First
Street, Suite 1160 Santa Ana, California 92705
(800) 622-6869 info@chiropracticcouncil.com
Mike,
I'm sending the $25,000 I owe you.
I'm hoping you'll forgive interest and court costs I owe
you.
Actually Mike, I'm hoping you'll send my $25,000 check
back to me.
I'd like to donate that $25,000 to the Orange County
Chiropractic District for the purpose of mobilizing doctors
of chiropractic to help stop fluoridation of Disneyland - or
any other purpose they designate.
See the end of PS2 below.
Thanks,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo todd@chiromotion.com
PS1 Some facts regarding The National Chiropractic
Council...
"...the nation's oldest chiropractic risk purchasing group."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
"...the best malpractice claims defense specialists in the
country."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/legal_defense.html
"...never lost a trial or an arbitration..."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
"...never settled a claim without the consent of our
chiropractor."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/legal_defense.html
"...Vice President and General Counsel, Michael Schroeder,
was named 1996 Chiropractic Attorney of the Year by the
National Association of Chiropractic Attorneys."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/legal_defense.html
PS2 Mike, you sued me for one million dollars - for libel -
as I worked to stop OBs from closing birth canals up to 30%
and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines...
You sued me for one million dollars as I was working to save
tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral
subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand.
You said you would make the lawsuit go away for $1,000
dollars. You demanded that I sign obvious lies. I refused. I
still have those papers you faxed and mailed. I spent $2,000-
plus trying to get the trial moved to Oregon. I failed. You
won a default judgement in the amount of $25,000 dollars.
The merits of the case were never argued.
I thought of your one million dollar libel suit against me
when I read on your (NCC) website:
"[W]e won't let our [malpractice liability insurance]
carrier tell you how to practice chiropractic."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
Mike, YOU told the chiropractic profession in California how
to practice chiropractic (Rule 302).
You wrote Rule 302 then "defended" it when 10 MD-
obstetricians sued.
You "won" and 10 MD-obstetricians "lost" and you and the 10
MD-obstetricians in effect got your Rule 302 judicially
rubberstamped.
Under your Rule 302, California DCs who once attended
thousands of homebirths could no longer sever umbilical
cords - but MD-obstetricians could still sever SPINAL NERVES
- that is - MD-obstetricians could still close birth canals
up to 30% and manipulate babies' spines so hard that they
sometimes severed spinal nerves.
MD-obstetricians are STILL closing birth canals up to 30%
and manipulating babies' spines so hard that they sometimes
sever spinal nerves.
You are a prominent "chiropractic" attorney Mike - you were
voted "Attorney of the Year" by the National Association of
Chiropractic Attorneys...
You won your $25,000 default judgement - but have you done
ANYTHING to stop the obvious spinal manipulation crime of
MD-obstetricians?
As I've repeatedly noted publicly, with birth canals
senselessly closed up to 30%, MD-obstetricians are violently
pushing on tiny spines (with oxytocin and Cytotec) and
gruesomely pulling (with hands, forceps and vacuums)...
I've also repeatedly noted publicly that MD-obstetricians
are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism "routine
episiotomy") - surgically/fraudlently inferring they are
doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.
AND I've repeatedly noted publicly that MD-obstetricians
are slicing ABDOMENS en mass (euphemism "c-section") -
surgically/fraudulently inferring they have DONE
everything possible to open birth canals even as they
close birth canals.
These are MASSIVE MD crimes - one is obviously pertinent to
chiropractic - the gruesome spinal manipulation of most
babies, Mike. Have you done ANYTHING to stop them?
In the early 90s, presumably based on your Rule 302, a man
calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the
California Board of Chiropractic Examiners told me that it
was outside my scope of practice to tell pregnant women that
OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%.
I think that man was you, Mike.
I think you were working for the 10 MD-obstetricians who
sued the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners.
I think MD-obstetricians saw the writing on their birth
monopoly wall as CNMwives got the right to slice vaginas.
CNMwives got this right **by slicing vaginas** then going to
the legislature and legislatively gaining an increase in
their scope of practice: the right to slice vaginas...
Thanks to California CNMwives, by law, episiotomy is now
part of "normal birth." As indicated above, most
episiotomies are obviously illegal:
(Sorry to repeat myself but) Aping their (former?) MD-
obstetrician masters/supervisors, CNMwives are slicing
vaginas - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing
everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they
CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%. BTW, MD-obstetricians
benefitted from this new CNMwifery practice right because
their most frequent surgical behavior toward women - an
obvious crime - is now by law part of "normal birth.")
What I'm getting at here, Mike, is that **even if your Rule
302 is right** - even if California DCs should not have been
attending thousands of homebirths all those years - there is
a way to gain practice rights just by doing - then going to
the legislature - just like the CNMwives did with
episiotomy.
But I still think your Rule 302 is wrong Mike. I think
California DCs have the right to attend births - even
without the extra training idea of Attorney David
Prescott...
See Rule 302, Birth and Trigon/Anthem (Glasscock) - and
ACOG's Willett LeHew, MD http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2252
See also: Tain, BPI and the Schroeder/Rule 302 matter... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2365
PLEASE NOTE: I am NOT saying I think DCs should start
attending births again - there are plenty of homebirth
midwives - though currently they are being ham-strung by the
obstetricians' "physician supervisor" game...
Bottomline Mike, I think the 10 MD-obstetricians were
SUPPOSED to "lose" to you - to get your Rule 302 judicially
rubberstamped - to get doctors of chiropractic to only
think about treating pregnant women's spines before and
after birth.
This latter notion - DCs having nothing to do with birth -
appears in your Rule 302 and in the American Chiropractic
Association's LAME advice for pregnant women.
See Pregnant? ACA MAKES A GOOD POINT! (but unfortunately...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2641
ACA makes NO MENTION of the white elephant fact that OBs are
knowingly closing birth canals - even though PLENTY of ACA
folks (Bob Dubin and Jim Edwards spring to mind) know I have
been writing about this for years.
I think MD-obstetricians have LONG been afraid that
doctors of chiropractic would discover that MD-
obstetricians are the most prolific spinal manipulators -
more specifically they are BABY manipulators - and
gruesome baby manipulators at that.
I think the medical game may be: "Hammer chiros for
causing strokes with spinal manipulation and they won't
dare expose medicine's stroke-causing spinal manipulation
crime against babies."
MDs very likely fear exposure of the very real possibility
that their routine GRUESOME spinal manipulation is causing
strokes in babies...
According to Nelson [2002]:
"Stroke in infants and children is an important cause of
morbidity and mortality..." --Karin B. Nelson, MD, NINDS
(Lynch et al. Pediatrics 2002 Jan;109(1):116-23]
See also: Strokes in babies! (also: WFC Pres. Paul F. Carey,
DC) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2275
And see Pran Manga and strokes in babies... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2634
Mike, I think you are protecting MD-obstetricians and their
horrible massive spinal manipulation crime against babies.
I think that's why you've done nothing to stop the spinal
manipulation crime of MDs since winning your $25,000 default
judgement.
I hope I am wrong about this. I hope you have been working
to help the tiniest chiropractic patients...
Regardless...
I am *hoping* you will do four things Mike:
1. Publicly state that you are no longer holding that
$25,000 dollar judgement against me and send my check
back to me.
2. Publicly encourage Disneyland DA Tony Rackauckas
to stop MD-obstetricians from closing birth canals
and gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating
babies' spines.
3. Publicly encourage Disneyland DA Tony Rackauckas to stop
public officials from dumping toxic phosphate fertilizer
waste (hydrofluorosilicic acid/"fluoride") into
Disneyland drinking water.
4. Publicly encourage Disneyland DA Tony to get on the
stick so that by the time Prof. Paul Connett's 1st
Citizens' Conference on Fluoride rolls around, he (Tony)
can be in New York as a featured surprise guest speaker
- to tell everyone how he detoxified Disneyland's
drinking water.
If your wife Susan Kang Schroeder (who is Tony's deputy DA
and spokeswoman) properly handles the media, it is possible
that MANY DAs from across the country could have their
drinking water systems detoxified by the time Prof.
Connett's 1st Citizens' Conference on Fluoride rolls around.
You and your wife could ALSO help Disneyland DA Tony save
tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative
vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to
adjust by hand.
AND MIKE... You will want to alert the doctors of
chiropractic whose malpractice insurance you handle that, in
high fluoride areas especially, relatively young people who
have been drinking lots of fluoridated water may be
unknowingly contracting "crippling skeletal fluorosis" -
this according to the National Academy of Sciences.
"Crippling skeletal fluorosis" may contraindicate some forms
of spinal manipulation.
For details regardinig fluoridation causing "crippling
skeletal fluorosis", see The Fluoride Deception by
Christopher Bryson [NY: Seven Stories Press. 2004:
last chapter]
BTW, my quotes and paraphrases from The Fluoride Deception
may be found
Ds...
1. Disneyland's toxic drinking water (also: Bizarre Irish
fluoride blarney) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2636
2. Tiny babies/Toxic fluoride... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-
list/message/2640
MANY good things could come from you doing the four things
I'm hoping you'll
Dt.
As alluded to above, if you send my $25,000 check back to
me, I will give $25,000 to the Orange County Chiropractic
District to help DCs help DA Tony stop fluoridation at
Disneyland - or for any other purpose they designate.
PS3 Your (NCC) website says,
"our insurance carrier must provide top quality financial
credentials."
http://www.chiropracticcouncil.com/we_listen.html
Who IS your insurance carrier Mike?
Malpractice liability insurance carriers should be informed
that MD-obstetricians are knowingly closing birth canals and
gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most babies'
spines at birth.
Perhaps malpractice liability insurance carriers greatly
fear putting out this information? Perhaps THEY control what
is - and what is not said - in birth trauma trials?
To my knowledge, not ONE birth trauma attorney has told a
jury that MD-obstetricians are closing birth canals.
This is happening in cases where "cephalopelvic
disproportion" is mentioned; that is, birth trauma attorneys
are letting OB defendants' and their attorneys blame BABIES
for having big heads (the "cephalo" part of cephalopelvic
disproportion) - as they IGNORE the fact that defendant OBs
are making the PELVIS smaller!
It's the DAMNDEST thing, Mike!
Please tell your insurance carrier that MD-obstetricians are
knowingly closing birth canals, etc.
PS4 THE FLUORINE LAWYERS COMMITTEE...
San Diego, CA (April 19, 2004) -- American Specialty Health
Networks (ASH Networks), the nation's leading complementary
health care organization, is pleased to announce a new
provider initiative-the Value-Added Program. Effective
April 1, 2004, ASH providers can now receive discounts of
up to 40 percent on professional malpractice insurance and
other products and services..."We're pleased to offer ASH
providers significant savings on malpractice liability
insurance," said Phillip Stump, President of Allied
Professionals and the National Chiropractic Council. http:-
//www.ashnetworks.com/NewsPress/Content/Articles/2004/p_ap-
r192004.asp
Mike, will you cc this to NCC President Phillip Stump?
Didn't Kurt Hegetschweiler, DC used to be an ASH mucky-muck?
My recollection is the Kurt was president of the
California Chiropractic Association back around the time
CCA made you an honorary member after your Rule 302 work
(or was it before).
I think CCA sold a pound of chiropractic flesh out the back
door by having you write Rule 302.
It's cool that you were free to jump to the Calif. Chiro
Board to defend your Rule 302 when 10 MD-obstetricians sued
and in effect helped you get your Rule 302 judicially
rubberstamped.
After that, a man calling himself Michael Schroeder,
attorney for the California Chiropractic Board told me it
was outside my scope of practice to tell pregnant women that
OBs are closing birth canals...
That was NOT cool.
Mike, if you pick up a copy of The Fluoride Deception, in
the glossy photo section, there is a photo of "Frank L.
Seamans, leading attorney representing the Aluminum Company
of America, and head of the Fluorine Lawyers Committee."
Attorneys are powerful people - clever people.
But I don't think ANYONE - attorney or otherwise - has a
right to remain silent as babies are poisoned and babies
are gruesomely manipulated - as OBs knowingly close
birth canals.
These are massive "healthcare" abominations, Mike.
Please use your formidable political power to help to
stop them.
I hope you'll do the four things enumerated above and send
my $25,000 check back to me.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Todd
Du. Gastaldo todd@chiromotion.com
Copied to: Orange County Chiropractic District President Bea
Heller, DC DrHeller@BeaHellerDC.com - and other Orange
County DCs...
Copied to: Orange County DA Tony Rackauckas
tony.rackauckas@da.ocgov.com
Orange County chiropractic physicians: I STRONGLY SUSPECT
MASS CHILD ABUSE IS OCCURRING: 1) Mass involuntary
medication by public officials - obviously the illegal
practice of medicine; and 2) mass gruesome spinal
manipulation by MDs - also obviously the illegal practice of
medicine. It is mandatory to report suspected child abuse.
Perhaps with "chiropractic" Atty Schroeder being so close to
Disneyland DA Tony - your suspected child abuse reports will
not be ignored like mine have been.
One last note: I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs.
MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this
culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder - medical school.
