Should FLYER be reinstated

Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.

Mjte- you are a piece of work, after some of the things you said on these boards and in PM's about Flyer you are now saying he gets banned because people don't like the message. Either you are too stupid to understand what really happened or you are simply a troll, someone who tries to stir things up.

Ullefan- He was banned by Steve because of his pm'ing threats to people, calling people dopers, accusing people of selling dope and reposting the same posts over and over in any and every thread, whether about that topic or not.

Even when he posts he can't say everything; he stays within the legal boundaries.......he always says he knows waaaaaaay more, but he would get sued if he tells everything (or in his case banned!!!)

Even in PM's he's always very cryptic....and when you ask some questions he says I can't reveal more......

But youre right would have liked him on the board during this.........I'm sure he knows more.......
After multiple exchanges with him, I find it more than reasonable to assume he doesn't know anything more than what he posted. In my experience, he was quite prone to claiming to "know" things he certainly didn't know. Perhaps this is a generalization, but when someone posts as aggressively as he did, and then claims they know more that they can't say, it's a pretty fair bet that they're not practicing honesty.

I'm not sure what boundaries you're talking about, but the posts I received from him, (and I was fortunate enough not to receive any threatening PMs), weren't within any forum boundaries I'm familiar with.

If people were really insulted by him, then they should really liven up, this is just a cycling forum and we're just discussing cycling, it's not the most important thing (although we like to think it is).
I think "discussing" is a key word here. What Flyer did doesn't fall within any definition of "discussion" of which I'm aware.

Well I had PM's with him......but I think he stopped posting........what's the point he gets banned on every board cause like I said they don't like his message....
I think you should consider the very strong possibility that it was his delivery, (and threats), rather than his message that lead to the ban.

Oh come on this is ridiculous... At times there were 4 or 5 guys that insulted Flyer at the same time. The impression I got was that some of the Armstrong-fans of this forum were in a contest to see who would insult him the most. There were posters that started posting just to insult Flyer. And now Flyer is the black-sheep? Because he snapped (eventually)? Well kudos to the man for holding on that much... If I were the mod there would be a few others accompanying Flyer on the way out...

Ah well I think it's a combination of factors..........but let's stop this discussion he won't be back so......



I think you should consider the very strong possibility that it was his delivery, (and threats), rather than his message that lead to the ban.

I know exactly why Flyer was banned. But, I can't tell any more because it would get a lot of my close friends who are European pros and coaches into a lot of trouble with WADA. ;)

If you don't want him back, then you are just part of the money hungry marketing scheme that is pro sports. :p

I know exactly why Flyer was banned. But, I can't tell any more because it would get a lot of my close friends who are European pros and coaches into a lot of trouble with WADA. ;)

If you don't want him back, then you are just part of the money hungry marketing scheme that is pro sports. :p
These, "I can't say more", claims sound to me like ten pounds of fluff.

This is my first post on cyclingforums, so please excuse my lack of formalities. I am the site administrator of dailypelotonforums.com.

MJtje is a frequent poster on our forums, and while he is of course more than entitled to express his opinion, I hope you will indulge me a moment to comment on his characterization.

MJtje is very well aware of the stance we take on doping issues at the Daily Peloton and on our forums - it has been discussed in detail. That he chooses to skew it here is disappointing.

The poster known here as Flyer was banned almost a year and a half ago on our original message board for the same kind of behavior he exhibited on our current forum.

I have had a number of personal emails from Flyer. Not only has he made accusations in these emails about specifically-named riders (maybe about some of you...), I am also aware that he has made similar accusations about me to others.

Simply put, in almost two years, he has been unable to adapt to reasonable requests. He appears incapable of complying with our acceptable use policy; neither is he someone that I wish to associate with.

Thanks.


The mods of cyclingforums in general don't seem to like his message.......he's also banned at dailypelotons doping forum.....

But she (the mod of dailypeloton) doesn't want bad things said about cycling.......the whole LA thing isn't being covered there........IF all media are covering it how come they don't..........

SG, this is a post a long time ago. In that time I wasn't posting as much on DP and did NOT know what youre policy was. And I've said also on DP I'm sorry what I said..........

Although I still stand behind the LA-case, which I think should have been discussed on DP!! But nothing but good words for DP......in fact the reason why I post more on DP nowadays is because I think the discussions are much better......

Again I'm sorry.....this was a comment months ago and you need to see that comment in that context........

And insofar as Flyer/H202.......I never had problems with him, but can understand that he is hard to handle especially as mod!!! Note that I never made a problem with the recent banning of H202 on DP.......

Can't turn back the time........sorry!


This is my first post on cyclingforums, so please excuse my lack of formalities. I am the site administrator of dailypelotonforums.com.

MJtje is a frequent poster on our forums, and while he is of course more than entitled to express his opinion, I hope you will indulge me a moment to comment on his characterization.

MJtje is very well aware of the stance we take on doping issues at the Daily Peloton and on our forums - it has been discussed in detail. That he chooses to skew it here is disappointing.

The poster known here as Flyer was banned almost a year and a half ago on our original message board for the same kind of behavior he exhibited on our current forum.

I have had a number of personal emails from Flyer. Not only has he made accusations in these emails about specifically-named riders (maybe about some of you...), I am also aware that he has made similar accusations about me to others.

Simply put, in almost two years, he has been unable to adapt to reasonable requests. He appears incapable of complying with our acceptable use policy; neither is he someone that I wish to associate with.

Thanks.

The Daily Peloton was exposed as a Lance Pharmstrong, Save Tyler, Free Floyd marketing platform. And that ship has been sunk along with Jeanna!

They have a pro-doping, pro denial policy.

In any case---they suck and will be sold soon!

This is my first post on cyclingforums, so please excuse my lack of formalities. I am the site administrator of dailypelotonforums.com.

MJtje is a frequent poster on our forums, and while he is of course more than entitled to express his opinion, I hope you will indulge me a moment to comment on his characterization.

MJtje is very well aware of the stance we take on doping issues at the Daily Peloton and on our forums - it has been discussed in detail. That he chooses to skew it here is disappointing.

The poster known here as Flyer was banned almost a year and a half ago on our original message board for the same kind of behavior he exhibited on our current forum.

I have had a number of personal emails from Flyer. Not only has he made accusations in these emails about specifically-named riders (maybe about some of you...), I am also aware that he has made similar accusations about me to others.

Simply put, in almost two years, he has been unable to adapt to reasonable requests. He appears incapable of complying with our acceptable use policy; neither is he someone that I wish to associate with.

Thanks.Hey. Why am I banned at DoublePenetration forums? Is it because I said rooster too many times or is it because I have a brain.