Slipstream1988
If you don't mind...I was hoping someone could help me understand something about my geometry versus frame geometry.
Me:
TT length: 59 cm
Stem length: 11 cm
Seat Tube length (center-to-top)65 or 66cm
Seat Tube length (center-to-center)61 cm
Seat Tube angle: 73
Crank arm length 175
Seat height from BB: 81.5 cm
Now I've been looking at many frames (stock) and it's really difficult to find a bike with a center-to-top size of 65-66cm.
How much would a shorter center-to-top length effect my pedaling efficiency as long as my seat height makes it to 81.5 cm??
Or...what would it effect in my overall position?? Would it cause me to use more energy than I should be using?
I have to keep in mind....I need a "zero" angle seat post (ie - it can't curve back).
I am left with the impression by the person who fit me that it's best to go with the "ideal" frame to one's dimensions.
Stock frames can't be perfect....so where are the "fudge factors" I can work with and not sacrifice my position on the bike???
Me:
TT length: 59 cm
Stem length: 11 cm
Seat Tube length (center-to-top)65 or 66cm
Seat Tube length (center-to-center)61 cm
Seat Tube angle: 73
Crank arm length 175
Seat height from BB: 81.5 cm
Now I've been looking at many frames (stock) and it's really difficult to find a bike with a center-to-top size of 65-66cm.
How much would a shorter center-to-top length effect my pedaling efficiency as long as my seat height makes it to 81.5 cm??
Or...what would it effect in my overall position?? Would it cause me to use more energy than I should be using?
I have to keep in mind....I need a "zero" angle seat post (ie - it can't curve back).
I am left with the impression by the person who fit me that it's best to go with the "ideal" frame to one's dimensions.
Stock frames can't be perfect....so where are the "fudge factors" I can work with and not sacrifice my position on the bike???

















