To all non believers...

Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.

Look, if you're looking for evidence of Armstrong doping -- facts -- use the search function on this site or google it.

Why should we do the cut-and-paste for you? It's all there. It's been stated ad nauseam.

BTW... Mo_Positives... you need to heed his advice.
Once again a nothing answer. Let me try this one more time. Can someone please tell me why Lance was never removed from the Tour or suspended from cycling like so many others?

Lets say you are walking down the street with a lot of money in your hand. Someone stops you and says “where did you get all that money. Did you rob the town bank?” You say “no I have been working hard.” And they say “no I think you robbed the bank.” And you say “no I have been working hard.” And they say “no I think you robbed the bank.” Etc. etc...

hey, saluki. interesting choice of analogy that baits another turn for this thread. considering your disposition, surely it wasn't intentional... LOL

anyways, I contend la was a bank robber during his tour campaigns and continues to be a robber maintaining his fraud of an organization, livestrong. He will never confess b/c it will destroy his foundation of lies.

LA was caught with peds and any effort to convince right-minded, free thinking people who possess more than two brain cells will be utterly futile. There are only two categories of people who still believe-- Those who don't know any better b/c they aren't aware of the truth and those who have an unhealthy obsession with the guy, typically expressed through fanatical rantings of defense, hero worship, and postings of pictures, usually manipulated in order to reaffirm imaginary image. :D

Once again a nothing answer. Let me try this one more time. Can someone please tell me why Lance was never removed from the Tour or suspended from cycling like so many others?Because he did not test positive during the tour. However, had the EPO test been around earlier, and <ding><ding><ding>, we have a winner. He did test positive for EPO. If he was so sure there was nothing in those urine samples, then answer me this, why did he not sue? Because there is no reason to confront the French conspiracy to defrock him? Because baseless accusations are something everyone who is innocent lets slide? I am guessing here, just a hypothesis really, but maybe....just maybe...he didn't want the content of that urine disclosed in a legal proceeding.

Once again a nothing answer. Let me try this one more time. Can someone please tell me why Lance was never removed from the Tour or suspended from cycling like so many others?
And if you are Lance, please just go away. Your 15 minutes are up, and you will not be missed.

If you are saluki, there are some great books on denial I can suggest.

If you are both, please seek counseling.

And if you are Lance, please just go away. Your 15 minutes are up, and you will not be missed.

If you are saluki, there are some great books on denial I can suggest.

If you are both, please seek counseling.

LOL!!! :D:p:D

If he was so sure there was nothing in those urine samples, then answer me this, why did he not sue?
He has sued about a million times numnuts. Why should Lance carry on and waste more time when it's never going to change the minds of people such as those on this forum.

Here's a sampling. Have fun.
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2005_01_0110-003.shtml

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1662547/posts

"I think we're 10-0 in lawsuits right now," Armstrong said Thursday. "My life is not about that anymore. I've answered all the questions."
Armstrong recently settled a libel case against Britain's Sunday Times newspaper over a June 2004 article that referred to the book, written by Pierre Ballester and David Walsh. The settlement followed a pretrial ruling by a High Court judge in Armstrong's favor. Two other recent rulings also vindicated Armstrong.

He recently sued to recover a $5 million bonus for winning in 2004. The insurance company under contract to pay the bonus had withheld it because of accusations that Armstrong had taken drugs. An arbitration panel awarded Armstrong $7.5 million.

He has sued about a million times numnuts. Why should Lance carry on and waste more time when it's never going to change the minds of people such as those on this forum.

Here's a sampling. Have fun.
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2005_01_0110-003.shtml

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1662547/posts

"I think we're 10-0 in lawsuits right now," Armstrong said Thursday. "My life is not about that anymore. I've answered all the questions."
Armstrong recently settled a libel case against Britain's Sunday Times newspaper over a June 2004 article that referred to the book, written by Pierre Ballester and David Walsh. The settlement followed a pretrial ruling by a High Court judge in Armstrong's favor. Two other recent rulings also vindicated Armstrong.

He recently sued to recover a $5 million bonus for winning in 2004. The insurance company under contract to pay the bonus had withheld it because of accusations that Armstrong had taken drugs. An arbitration panel awarded Armstrong $7.5 million.Its "numBnuts" you fucking moron.

He sued over things that would not bring those particular samples into a legal proceeding. He has yet to bring suit over the only tests we do have showing he doped. He sues over things that were said about him, but not urine samples. You are a moron.

I contend Which also means you assume. Assume makes an ASS out of U and ME. Stick to the facts please. Don't assume.

any effort to convince right-minded, free thinking people who possess more than two brain cells will be utterly futile.This type of emotional outburst is a sign that you have nothing to support what you believe other than your belief.

He has sued about a million times numnuts. Why should Lance carry on and waste more time when it's never going to change the minds of people such as those on this forum.

Here's a sampling. Have fun.
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2005_01_0110-003.shtml

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1662547/posts

"I think we're 10-0 in lawsuits right now," Armstrong said Thursday. "My life is not about that anymore. I've answered all the questions."
Armstrong recently settled a libel case against Britain's Sunday Times newspaper over a June 2004 article that referred to the book, written by Pierre Ballester and David Walsh. The settlement followed a pretrial ruling by a High Court judge in Armstrong's favor. Two other recent rulings also vindicated Armstrong.

He recently sued to recover a $5 million bonus for winning in 2004. The insurance company under contract to pay the bonus had withheld it because of accusations that Armstrong had taken drugs. An arbitration panel awarded Armstrong $7.5 million.
Riddle me this, why after suing everyone else over what they "said" you did, do you not sue over urine samples that contain EPO? This would totally exonerate you forever. End of story. Yet he chooses at that moment to move on with his life? Hmmm.......

Which also means you assume. Assume makes an ASS out of U and ME. Stick to the facts please. Don't assume.

This type of emotional outburst is a sign that you have nothing to support what you believe other than your belief.Come on, you keep demanding answers...."The question....ANSWER THE QUESTION!!"-John McEnroe

listen saluki, I mean lance. why do you continue to deny your six positives? why don't you sue over that, as TFF astutely replied? could it be your emotional response forbids you from thinking clearly? Just answer those questions, please. or do you lack intellectual integrity? or are you simply starving for attention which compells you to act like a troll? enquiring minds want to know...

Once again a nothing answer. Let me try this one more time. Can someone please tell me why Lance was never removed from the Tour or suspended from cycling like so many others?Cause Armstrong never tested positive. Now, explain to me why Bjarne Riis was never removed from the Tour or suspended from cycling.

Cause Armstrong never tested positive.Ladies and Gentleman, we have a winner!!!! I was getting worried for a minute that no one would have an answer. Here is a bracelet just for you.


http://themodulator.org/archives/yellow_band_b.gif

Once again a nothing answer. Let me try this one more time. Can someone please tell me why Lance was never removed from the Tour or suspended from cycling like so many others?Because he never tested positive. Is that what you're fishing for?

Before you go jackoff, consider this:

Basso... never tested positive.
Ulrich... never tested positive.
Pantani... never tested positive.
Andreu... never tested positive.
Armstrong... never tested positive.

He's in rare company.

Ladies and Gentleman, we have a winner!!!! I was getting worried for a minute that no one would have an answer. Here is a bracelet just for you.


http://themodulator.org/archives/yellow_band_b.gif

....

"This type of emotional outburst is a sign that you have nothing to support what you believe other than your belief." -- Shithead, recently

No_, this is Mo_.

I am Lance. Six positives for EPO and seven Tour victories.

Look, son, there's no reason for you to delude yourself any longer with this foolish notion that I could have some how won the Tour seven times without doping.

I'm asking you to please, tear down the posters of Me from off the ceiling of your bed room; put away the Live Strong cockrings and the yellow dildos; deflate your life size doll of me and put it in the trash compactor; throw away the picture of me stuffing my cock in Dr. House's mouth, you closeted Dr. House freak show; put your seat back on your bicycle and remove that improvised yellow dildo you fastened to your seatpost with a hose clamp; throw out the Credit Lyon stuffed lion you've been sexually abusing; try riding a bicycle for a change instead of burning holes in your Lance DVDs with you DVD player while masturbating furiously to the Flock of Seagulls…

I'm sure I'm missing a few. Maybe the forum members can chime in.

Because he never tested positive.Wait a minute, we have yet another winner!!!!!!! CONGRATULATIONS. They are dropping like flies now. That's two down and a ton to go.

LIVE STRONG!!!!:p :p :p

Wait a minute, we have yet another winner!!!!!!! CONGRATULATIONS. They are dropping like flies now. That's two down and a ton to go.

LIVE STRONG!!!!:p :p :pOkay, you can go have a wonderfully fulfilling relationship with your Lance Armstrong doll now.

No_Pos: "Lance, I made them say it! I made them say you never tested positive! Can I suck your cock now?"

Plastic Lance (Nodding his head in approval): Squeek.

No_pos tries to continue the conversation but can't with Lance's plastic cock in his mouth.

Okay, you can go have a wonderfully fulfilling relationship with your Lance Armstrong doll now.

No_Pos: "Lance, I made them say it! I made them say you never tested positive! Can I suck your cock now?"

Plastic Lance (Nodding his head in approval): Squeek.

No_pos tries to continue the conversation but can't with Lance's plastic cock in his mouth.......uhh.........thats not her mouth, it just smells like her mouth.

Please photoshop it, Helmut. Pleeeeease.Okay, you can go have a wonderfully fulfilling relationship with your Lance Armstrong doll now.

No_Pos: "Lance, I made them say it! I made them say you never tested positive! Can I suck your cock now?"

Plastic Lance (Nodding his head in approval): Squeek.

No_pos tries to continue the conversation but can't with Lance's plastic cock in his mouth.