Why is there no spam in this section?

Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.

????????????????????????????????????????

Is someone monitoring it?

On Mar 20, 2:30 pm, 531Aussie <531Aussie.36j...@no-
mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote:
> ????????????????????????????????????????
>
> Is someone monitoring it?
>
> --
> 531Aussie

Dunno what this section is from your end as I see you're posting
through cyclingforums, but from my end it's a usenet newsgroup. It
does get spammed, but not too badly.

On Mar 20, 12:30 pm, 531Aussie <531Aussie.36j...@no-
mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote:
> Is someone monitoring it?

sshhhhh! You will wake the trolls!

Dunno what this section is from your end as I see you're posting
through cyclingforums, but from my end it's a usenet newsgroup. It
does get spammed, but not too badly.

But I thought 'rec.bicycles.misc' and 'rec.bicycles.tech' are also part of USENET, and they can smashed with spam

On 2008-03-20, 531Aussie (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>
> lemmiwinks.au@gmail.com Wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dunno what this section is from your end as I see you're posting
>> through cyclingforums, but from my end it's a usenet newsgroup. It
>> does get spammed, but not too badly.
>
> But I thought 'rec.bicycles.misc' and 'rec.bicycles.tech' are also part
> of USENET, and they can smashed with spam

Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!

--
TimC
"A distributed system is one in which I cannot get something done
because a machine I've never heard of is down." -- Leslie Lamport

TimC wrote:
> Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!

The shrubber?


BTH

Hee Hee
NNN I I I I !!!!!!!

"BT Humble" <bt_humble@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:e01a0e21-b014-485f-a729-50e079a64793@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> TimC wrote:
>> Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!
>
> The shrubber?
>
>
> BTH

Hee Hee
NNN I I I I !!!!!!!

"BT Humble" <bt_humble@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:e01a0e21-b014-485f-a729-50e079a64793@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> TimC wrote:
>> Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!
>
> The shrubber?
>
>
> BTH

Except we are no longer the Knights Who Say "Ni"

The shrubber?

No, the boxtard. Unfortunately the GKS has also been stirred from from it's slumber.

On 2008-03-20, 531Aussie (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>
> ????????????????????????????????????????
>
> Is someone monitoring it?

So who was the idiot who asked about spam?

Thanks for waking them up!

;)

Now can you tell me why emacs's flyspell spellchecker doesn't like any
of spam, flyspell, or spellchecker?

--
TimC
"Application encountered an error while failing. Error recovered
successfully, proceeding to fail"