Worlds thru WRR

[Dan Connelly]

Okay, here's my scoring system, not checked for errors:

NED 78 SWE 76 GBR 65 UZ 45 GER 43 SPA 25 AUS 20 BEL 18 RUS 19 DEN 6 CZE 6 UKR 2

Points available in Men's RR : 150, 60, 30 for 1, 2, 3. So winner takes all. All other events are
for minor placings.

Women's RR was 75, 30, 15.

Dan

[Ewoud Dronkert]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:48:54 GMT, Dan Connelly wrote:
> Okay, here's my scoring system, not checked for errors:

http://www.phys.uu.nl/~dronkert/cycling/hamilton.php

[Robert Chung]

Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:48:54 GMT, Dan Connelly wrote:
>> Okay, here's my scoring system, not checked for errors:
>
> http://www.phys.uu.nl/~dronkert/cycling/hamilton.php

Wouldn't Dan weight the women's events about as much as Cat 3 men's events?

[Ewoud Dronkert]

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:16:12 +0200, Robert Chung wrote:
> Wouldn't Dan weight the women's events about as much as Cat 3 men's events?

He would if for him speed equaled prestige and importance. Apparently not. Btw, I did think he had W
and U23 the wrong way 'round.

[Dan Connelly]

That's correct. Frankly, I think the Jr men could be competitive with the women. But I gave the
women's race a coefficient of 5, and the junior men a coefficient of 1.

Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:16:12 +0200, Robert Chung wrote:
>
>>Wouldn't Dan weight the women's events about as much as Cat 3 men's events?
>
>
> He would if for him speed equaled prestige and importance. Apparently not. Btw, I did think he had
> W and U23 the wrong way 'round.