Running equations

[What?\" She Whi]

We seem to be in the midst of a spate of pseudo-scientific running
equations at the moment, so I though 'd join in with
'BlondHairGreenEyesCuteBum's' rec.runner membership equations:

The likelihood of you being a welcome poster to rec.running bay be expressed as;

the square root of (a/b)*(((c*d)+e*f))-(g/h))+i

if the value is >0, the poster will be welcome.

Where:

a = the total number of posts made by an individual to rec.running

b = the number of replies received to (a) from Oz

c = the posters pb for 5k in whole minutes

d = the posters birth weight in ounces

e = pi (no formula is complete without pi in it somewhere)

f = the number of times the poster has been insulted by a troll

g = the number of times the poster has started a diet

h = the probability that the poster may oneday try to complete a marathon without walking

i = the posters relative 'gayness' on a scale of 1 - 10 with 1 being a butch hunk and 10 being a
fruity gay-boy.

[Doug Freese]

What?" she whispered, "D'you think that'll work? wrote:

> We seem to be in the midst of a spate of pseudo-scientific running equations at the moment, so I
> though 'd join in with 'BlondHairGreenEyesCuteBum's' rec.runner membership equations:
>
> The likelihood of you being a welcome poster to rec.running bay be expressed as;
>
> the square root of (a/b)*(((c*d)+e*f))-(g/h))+i
>
> if the value is >0, the poster will be welcome.

How can this be true formula without the sine of the angle of the torso in relationship to the
horizon and some velocity if not acceleration coefficient.

--
Doug Freese "Caveat Lector" dfreeseS@NOBShvc.rr.com

[Miss Anne Throp]

Posters getting insulted by trolls? When? Where?

[Drlith]

"What?" she whispered, "D'you think that'll work?"
<GreenEyesBlondHairCuteBum@greedyforyourlove.edu.fr> wrote in message
news:hidp205g542ml186ii7q2mo7f3assn0ehv@4ax.com...
> i = the posters relative 'gayness' on a scale of 1 - 10 with 1 being a butch hunk and 10 being a
> fruity gay-boy.

Well, thank god at least I'm a butch hunk!

And my avocado's number is 4, which is the maximum number of avocados I can eat at a single sitting.

[Leo]

>>
>> the square root of (a/b)*(((c*d)+e*f))-(g/h))+i
>>
>> if the value is >0, the poster will be welcome.
>
>
>
> How can this be true formula without the sine of the angle of the torso in relationship to the
> horizon and some velocity if not acceleration coefficient.

Keeerist, Freese. That is a constant and a constant can be assumed in any formula!

[Asswiper Toilet]

As usual, "Dumb Doug" has screwed it up again. He forgot the hypotenuse squared, over Pi212 to thye
9th power, and then you subtract the torso higerruppy from the transom weight.

Doug Freese <dfreese@NOBShvc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<LZ2Xb.20375$Lp.8600@twister.nyc.rr.com>...
> What?" she whispered, "D'you think that'll work? wrote:
>
> > We seem to be in the midst of a spate of pseudo-scientific running equations at the moment, so I
> > though 'd join in with 'BlondHairGreenEyesCuteBum's' rec.runner membership equations:
> >
> > The likelihood of you being a welcome poster to rec.running bay be expressed as;
> >
> > the square root of (a/b)*(((c*d)+e*f))-(g/h))+i
> >
> > if the value is >0, the poster will be welcome.
>
>
> How can this be true formula without the sine of the angle of the torso in relationship to the
> horizon and some velocity if not acceleration coefficient.

[Surf McBrowse]

> We seem to be in the midst of a spate of pseudo-scientific running
> equations at the moment, so I though 'd join in with
> 'BlondHairGreenEyesCuteBum's' rec.runner membership equations:

Roger my dasypygal leptorrhinian, your equation leaves me undefined. Sadly his Ozness has yet to
smile upon my lifes work.

Surf

[Lyndon]

>We seem to be in the midst of a spate of pseudo-scientific running equations at the moment.

Hmmm, I actually posted a real, live exponential in a different thread...and it looks like young
Harry just opened the Chamber of Secrets. So, Roger, I take it that math isn't your forte?

You'll like this one a little less. This is the famous (or infamous, depending on whether you like
the conclusion) "Harvard" study on what makes you run fast:

http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/89/5/1991

I knew all those old JAP issues were good for something....

Lyndon

"Speed Kills...It kills those that don't have it!" --US Olympic Track Coach Brooks Johnson

[What?\" She Whi]

On 13 Feb 2004 20:53:48 GMT, airlyndon@aol.comnospam (Lyndon) wrote:

> So, Roger, I take it that math isn't your forte?

Wooooosh! Your arrow strikes at my heart!

Quite correct, I'm a complete mathematical duffus. I only just s-c-r-a-p-e-d the necessary maths
qualification for Uni entrance and struggled terribly with the maths content on my course.

Strange thing is, both my kids are maths wizards and are heading their respective years in maths.
Proof - if proof were needed - that in the past my wife has been up to no good with other men.

[David Forbes]

No need to blame your wife, unless of course you want to. Hybrid vigor is the answer.

"What?\" she whispered, \"D'you think that'll work?" wrote:
>
> On 13 Feb 2004 20:53:48 GMT, airlyndon@aol.comnospam (Lyndon) wrote:
>
> > So, Roger, I take it that math isn't your forte?
>
> Wooooosh! Your arrow strikes at my heart!
>
> Quite correct, I'm a complete mathematical duffus. I only just s-c-r-a-p-e-d the necessary maths
> qualification for Uni entrance and struggled terribly with the maths content on my course.
>
> Strange thing is, both my kids are maths wizards and are heading their respective years in maths.
> Proof - if proof were needed - that in the past my wife has been up to no good with other men.

[Keith Stone]

Doug Freese <dfreese@NOBShvc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<LZ2Xb.20375$Lp.8600@twister.nyc.rr.com>...

> How can this be true formula without the sine of the angle of the torso in relationship to the
> horizon and some velocity if not acceleration coefficient.

Goota get the angle of the dangle in there somewhere too.

Keith Stone