| aus.bicycle This forum is a gateway to the aus.bicycle usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
*ducks* |
|
#32
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
and to borrow from gplama's capacity for excellent analogies: the alpine classic is as much a race as peak hour on the monash freeway. |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
warrwych wrote: > Theo Bekkers Wrote: >> Only 2/3? Surely racing is against the law, even if you're doing less >> than >> the speed limit. How about riding more than 2 abreast? > Define racing. I think the word "racing" is not used accurately within > these reports, and particular training activities (eg sprint efforts) > or fast-paced rolling bunches are seen as "racing" by the general > public/media/police. Having ridden on Beach Rd on both Saturday and > Sunday mornings several times a year, I don't see anyone racing. When someone gloats to the ng that "I beat gplama" at least someone thought it was a race. > If racing were illegal, clubs wouldnt be able to hold races. Racing on open public roads without a permit is illegal. > It is also legal for pairs of riders to be passing other pairs of > riders and remain 2 abreast while doing so (ie 4 across a lane). This > has been discussed elsewhere and at other times on this forum. Blah, blah, rationalise, blah. > And yes, I am being pedantic, but please let's keep some perspective > and rationality on this one, rather than inflaming an already inflamed > subject (general comment and not targetted at Theo). So why does everybody keep going on about McGee? Theo |
|
#34
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
![]() C'mon peoples... happy place happy place... I had a driver wave and smile at me today because I gave way to him at a round-a-bout (which is what I should have done anyways (and DID)). I returned a smile and a nod.. it was great... I then nearly got taken out head-on by a 4WD no more than 30 seconds later, but hey, thems the breaks! |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
TimC wrote: > Theo Bekkers wrote > Given that 150/200 of the riders are going to have no chance of > beating the rest of the bunch, ever, do you think they are going to be > treating it as a race, or merely just participating in it as a > training ride? And given that it was the riders at the back that are > more likely to blow any reds, then they aren't racing, are they? By that definition most of the sprinters in the TdeF weren't actually racing. :-) A pack of 200 riders on a public road? ****, that does sound dangerous. >> So why does everybody keep going on about McGee? > A bit different to a guy riding a bike, below the speed and alcohol > limits, who hasn't yet been proven whether he had been riding > irresonsibly for the past hour and a half, or whether this was just a > moment where he couldn't get to his brakes in time. You need to ride irresponsibly for an hour and a half before you become culpable? Having said that, I almost feel sorry for him. Theo |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
|
#37
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
aaaah Theo, so articulate, so entertaining blah blah blah and re: McGee. McGee ran away to sober up and get his brother to help him out. The cyclist who hit Mr Gould apparently stopped and assisted. That's the difference. |
|
#38
| ||||
| ||||
|
#39
| |||
| |||
|
#40
| |||
| |||
|
#41
| |||
| |||
|
#42
| |||
| |||
On 2006-08-30, Theo Bekkers (aka Bruce) was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: > TimC wrote: >> Theo Bekkers wrote > >> Given that 150/200 of the riders are going to have no chance of >> beating the rest of the bunch, ever, do you think they are going to be >> treating it as a race, or merely just participating in it as a >> training ride? And given that it was the riders at the back that are >> more likely to blow any reds, then they aren't racing, are they? > > By that definition most of the sprinters in the TdeF weren't actually > racing. :-) Most of the sprinters? Sure, they were racing for the stage, not the GC. It's also a teams race, and most of them aren't racing, they're merely trying to hang on for as long as possible so they're able to support other riders who are. > A pack of 200 riders on a public road? ****, that does sound dangerous. Well, Harry Barber's own ATB and GVBRs have bigger packs, with less experienced more gumby riders. Sure, they have police presence, but only covering about 1% of the actual length of the field in a given day. >>> So why does everybody keep going on about McGee? > >> A bit different to a guy riding a bike, below the speed and alcohol >> limits, who hasn't yet been proven whether he had been riding >> irresonsibly for the past hour and a half, or whether this was just a >> moment where he couldn't get to his brakes in time. > > You need to ride irresponsibly for an hour and a half before you become > culpable? Demonstrated culpability vs error of judgement. -- TimC "It took people a long time to figure out which machine was [mooing], and even longer to figure out how. But for some reason it didn't take them any time at all to figure that I'd done it." -- Paul Tomblin on ASR |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
|
#44
| |||
| |||
Theo Bekkers wrote: > TimC wrote: > > Theo Bekkers wrote > > > Given that 150/200 of the riders are going to have no chance of > > beating the rest of the bunch, ever, do you think they are going to be > > treating it as a race, or merely just participating in it as a > > training ride? And given that it was the riders at the back that are > > more likely to blow any reds, then they aren't racing, are they? > > By that definition most of the sprinters in the TdeF weren't actually > racing. :-) > A pack of 200 riders on a public road? ****, that does sound dangerous. It is. Moreso when it's mostly riders desperatly trying to go as fast as they can to stay with the bunch. It is less of an issue with mass participation tootles (ATB etc) although there is a greater (IMO) risk in these rides than there is in small bunches. What happened, was bound to happen, sooner or later, which does not dimish the responsibility of those involved. I have actively discouraged the riders I work with from participating in the hellride for years, as I didn't want them (or indirectly, myself) involved in the inevitable serious injury or death. Any coach that encourages their riders to participate in rides like the hellride is, IMO, grossly irresponsible. Any rider that participates in it, the same. Even if you play by the rules while doing it, a significant number of riders do not, and being part of it validates that behaviour. I stopped recommending the north rd fast rides a few years ago when the size of them swelled to the point that they broke up at lights and the bunch started shooting reds regularly. IMO it became too dangerous to support. We use public roads responsibly and abide by the road laws, and keep our bunch sizes small so they're manageable and a lot less dangerous than 200 mostly wannabes on the rivet trying to get cred at cafe wanker. Now those wankers have a scalp to be proud of. Well done .... As cfs has quoted, riding well is riding advocacy, but riding badly harms us all. |
|
#45
| |||
| |||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 AM.
Translations made by vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Translations made by vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









blah blah blah 



Linear Mode


















