Go Back   Cycling Forums » Other Stuff » Other Groups » aus.bicycle
aus.bicycle This forum is a gateway to the aus.bicycle usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section!













First roadie, sora vs 105

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04.-2007
Jules
 
Posts: n/a
Default First roadie, sora vs 105

I've figured it's time to stop slowly morphing my MTB into something
faster and just get a proper road bike.

I'm not looking to spend heaps of cash, partly because I figure there's
less embarrassment in being passed by much fitter people when you're on
a cheap bike ;-)

So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped bike.

I took one of each out for a test ride today, and didn't really feel a
lot of difference in the gear shifts and crank-ability.

Given this'll be my first road bike, I'm leaning toward the cheaper
option so I can get used to this "roadie" concept and perhaps in a
couple of years I might see reason to upgrade.

Opinions / thoughts?

Cheers,
Jules
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04.-2007
petulance
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

On Mar 5, 1:06 pm, Jules <sdf...@example.com> wrote:
>
> So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped bike.
>
> I took one of each out for a test ride today, and didn't really feel a
> lot of difference in the gear shifts and crank-ability.
>
>
> Opinions / thoughts?
>


<snipped bits and pieces>

what is the price difference?

A few things to note
- Sora is 8 speed while the new 105 is 10 speed
- the Sora shifter might be different to the other Shimano shifters.
There is a smaller lever on all Shimano shifters to perform an
upshift. This smaller lever is not present on one or two types of Sora
shifters.



Oh, and if you do end up getting the Sora equipped roadie, give me a
yell if you need a replacement 8 speed chain. I have an 8-speed Dura
Ace chain in the original packing that I'm am trying to get rid
off ...



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04.-2007
LotteBum's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bris Vegas
Age: 28
Posts: 1,138
Rep Power: 7
LotteBum is on a distinguished road
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

It really depends on how many k's you plan on doing, and how long you plan to keep the bike for.

Personally, I'd be leaning towards 105 - it'll last a lot longer and be more reliable.

But that's just my opinion.

I like your attitude about being passed - that's great!

Lotte
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04.-2007
gravelmuncher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Blue Mountains NSW
Age: 33
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 7
gravelmuncher
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

Ahh...don't forget that there is the Tiagra groupo that sit's between Sora and 105. The impression that I'm getting is that Tiagra has been all dressed up this time around and is awesome value. It also offers 3 crank options: 52/39 double, 50/34 compact double, and a 50/39/30 triple. I reckon it'd be as good as 105 USED to be, which is GOOD!!

IMO, i'd go for this and forget Sora. Sora is for bikes that sit in the shed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04.-2007
DaveB
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

Jules wrote:
>
> So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped bike.
>


Isn't Tiagra in between those two?

DaveB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04.-2007
PiledHigher
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

I thought the ergonomics were different too, Sora has the thumbshifter
that is like a poor imitation of Campag.


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-04.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 22
Posts: 492
Rep Power: 6
SomeGuy
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules
I've figured it's time to stop slowly morphing my MTB into something
faster and just get a proper road bike.

I'm not looking to spend heaps of cash, partly because I figure there's
less embarrassment in being passed by much fitter people when you're on
a cheap bike ;-)

So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped bike.

I took one of each out for a test ride today, and didn't really feel a
lot of difference in the gear shifts and crank-ability.

Given this'll be my first road bike, I'm leaning toward the cheaper
option so I can get used to this "roadie" concept and perhaps in a
couple of years I might see reason to upgrade.

Opinions / thoughts?

Cheers,
Jules
Sora is definately a cut below the rest of the shimano road groups. I'll try to sum up the differences in the 07 lines, although I may not be 100% accurate:

Sora:
8 speed
Upshifter in different location, which is hard to reach in the drops
Octalink cranks/BB

Tiagra
9 speed
Indictators built into shifter
External bearing cranks

105
10 speed
External bearing cranks

As you move up the groupsets they also become lighter and more durable. My personal recomendation would be Tiagra if you are after value. It's a big step up from sora for little $. The cranks are a big jump up too, but you've got to find a bike with the shimano cranks to benifit from that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-04.-2007
Boostland
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105


"Jules" <sdfsdf@example.com> wrote in message
news:sWKGh.7313$8U4.4260@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> I've figured it's time to stop slowly morphing my MTB into something
> faster and just get a proper road bike.
>
> I'm not looking to spend heaps of cash, partly because I figure there's
> less embarrassment in being passed by much fitter people when you're on a
> cheap bike ;-)
>
> So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped
> bike.
>
> I took one of each out for a test ride today, and didn't really feel a lot
> of difference in the gear shifts and crank-ability.
>
> Given this'll be my first road bike, I'm leaning toward the cheaper option
> so I can get used to this "roadie" concept and perhaps in a couple of
> years I might see reason to upgrade.
>
> Opinions / thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Jules


I would suggest Tiagra at the minimum as Sora is quite a step down in
quality from Tiagra & 105 and above.


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05.-2007
Bleve
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105


Jules wrote:
> I've figured it's time to stop slowly morphing my MTB into something
> faster and just get a proper road bike.
>
> I'm not looking to spend heaps of cash, partly because I figure there's
> less embarrassment in being passed by much fitter people when you're on
> a cheap bike ;-)
>
> So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped bike.
>
> I took one of each out for a test ride today, and didn't really feel a
> lot of difference in the gear shifts and crank-ability.
>
> Given this'll be my first road bike, I'm leaning toward the cheaper
> option so I can get used to this "roadie" concept and perhaps in a
> couple of years I might see reason to upgrade.
>
> Opinions / thoughts?


Get Tiagra or 105. Sora is for bikes that don't get ridden much.

Tiagra & 105 can be upgraded as they wear out, sora is always sora.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05.-2007
TimC
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

On 2007-03-05, Jules (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> I've figured it's time to stop slowly morphing my MTB into something
> faster and just get a proper road bike.


I had a dream lastnight. Getting on a hybrid and going *sooo* slowly
despite all my effort. I do hope it was because in the upright
position I couldn't put the power down, and not simply that I have
become so unfit.

--
TimC
"This company performed an illegal operation but they will not be shut
down." -- Scott Harshbarger from consumer lobby group on Microsoft
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-05.-2007
TimC
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

On 2007-03-05, petulance (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> On Mar 5, 1:06 pm, Jules <sdf...@example.com> wrote:
>>
>> So the choice basically comes down to a Sora-equipped or 105-equipped bike.
>>
>> I took one of each out for a test ride today, and didn't really feel a
>> lot of difference in the gear shifts and crank-ability.
>>
>>
>> Opinions / thoughts?

>
> <snipped bits and pieces>
>
> what is the price difference?
>
> A few things to note
> - Sora is 8 speed while the new 105 is 10 speed
> - the Sora shifter might be different to the other Shimano shifters.
> There is a smaller lever on all Shimano shifters to perform an
> upshift. This smaller lever is not present on one or two types of Sora
> shifters.


The small lever is on mine (er, 2005 era, 2006 model?). Having ridden
my 8 speed Sora for 15000km, I see no problem with it. I keep
mangling the derailleur each time I have a bandicoot episode anyway --
might as well make it a cheap mistake to make.

--
TimC
A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation. --unknown
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-05.-2007
TimC
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

On 2007-03-05, gravelmuncher (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> IMO, i'd go for this and forget Sora. Sora is for bikes that sit in
> the shed.


Meh.

And besides, it's only because I'm a fair weather cyclist and can't
hack this 40 degree business. Stupid summer.

--
TimC
-o)
/\\ The penguins are coming...
_\_v the penguins are coming...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-05.-2007
TimC
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

On 2007-03-05, Bleve (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> Get Tiagra or 105. Sora is for bikes that don't get ridden much.
>
> Tiagra & 105 can be upgraded as they wear out, sora is always sora.


Next you'll be telling me my honeycomb crunch GVBR bike is crap too!

--
TimC
load "linux",8,1
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-05.-2007
Gags
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

"gravelmuncher" <gravelmuncher.2myckb@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote
in message news:gravelmuncher.2myckb@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com...
>
> Ahh...don't forget that there is the Tiagra groupo that sit's between
> Sora and 105. The impression that I'm getting is that Tiagra has been
> all dressed up this time around and is awesome value. It also offers 3
> crank options: 52/39 double, 50/34 compact double, and a 50/39/30
> triple. I reckon it'd be as good as 105 USED to be, which is GOOD!!
>
>
> IMO, i'd go for this and forget Sora. Sora is for bikes that sit in
> the shed.
>


My first roadie had Sora on it and I put about 20000km or so through the
drive train and the only thing that I had to replace was a chain that I
snapped.......curse my massive power output!!!! But seriously, I didn't
have any problems with the groupset and there was a certain satisfaction to
be had when I won my first couple of crits in D Grade on it against guys
running Record and Dura Ace......speaking of which, I am thinking about
having a crack at the Kew crits on a SS roadie at some stage....I will have
to get off my **** and replace the cowhorns with normal road bars, screw off
the fixed cog, then screw on a freewheel cog - I figure if I get a ratio
that is pretty close to being right for the final sprint up the hill then
all I would have to do would be hang on till the last corner and then have a
crack!!! Of course I will actually have to get to the race first which
might prove to be harder than setting my bike up!!!

Gags


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-05.-2007
DaveB
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First roadie, sora vs 105

Gags wrote:
> running Record and Dura Ace......speaking of which, I am thinking about
> having a crack at the Kew crits on a SS roadie at some stage....


Post a warning hear if you do so we can all go down and watch the
entertainment.

DaveB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish