| bicycles.recumbent archive This forum is a gateway to the bicycles.recumbent usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hi, I was wondering if any one has had any experience with a Cannondale recumbent. Thanks in advance, George |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
What do you want to know?? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
On 5/8/03 9:32 PM, in article b9f05s$699$1@news.datasync.com, "Nathan" <news@southerncyclist.com> wrote: > What do you want to know?? > > Hi, I want to buy my first recumbent and I wanted to know two things: 1) How does the bike compare, with it's 20/16 wheels, to bikes with larger wheels and 2) if people have been happy with their Easyrider after a few months of riding. I live in Massachusetts and this and two Burley's are the only recumbent that I have been able to test ride. I do like the looks of the EasyRacer's Tour-Easy, but there is no one in a radius of 150 miles that has one to test ride. Thanks, George |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
I took a short test ride on the Cannondale and found it uninteresting. Not enough gears and it does not handle that well. Your best bet would be to test ride as many models as you can and try to do some hill climbs if you can. I found the Tour Easy the best handling bike of the ones I tested, with the Sun Bicycles EZ Sport LE a close second. I hope this helps you. Good luck. I know it's kind of hard to decide if you don't have a dealer in your area. On Fri, 09 May 2003 20:44:09 GMT, George Newton Jr <george@georgenewton.com> wrote: >On 5/8/03 9:32 PM, in article b9f05s$699$1@news.datasync.com, "Nathan" ><news@southerncyclist.com> wrote: > >> What do you want to know?? >> >> >Hi, > >I want to buy my first recumbent and I wanted to know two things: > >1) How does the bike compare, with it's 20/16 wheels, to bikes with larger wheels and >2) if people have been happy with their Easyrider after a few months of riding. > >I live in Massachusetts and this and two Burley's are the only recumbent that I have been able to >test ride. I do like the looks of the EasyRacer's Tour-Easy, but there is no one in a radius of 150 >miles that has one to test ride. > >Thanks, George |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
There is a bike shop in Old Saybrooke, CT that has many recumbents. I believe that they also had a toureasy. There is a also a bike shop in Boston that sells recumbents. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
> Not enough gears and it does not handle that well. I find your comment "Not enough gears" quite interesting as the C-dale recumbent comes stock with a 27 speed drivetrain. Many recumbents are still coming with 21 to 24 speed drivetrains. The mid drive arrangement gives this bike a gear range of somewhere around 18 to 116 gear inches. Do you need more than this? The handling issue is of course personal preference and what may seem "uninteresting" to you, is nirvana to another individual. Different strokes for different folks as they say:-) Edward Wong Orlando, FL |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
Thanks. Do you know the name or where in Boston that bike shop is. I have found Old Saybrooke Ct on the map and I am going to drive down there to find it. I would love to test ride the Toureasy. George On 5/10/03 12:23 AM, in article CJqdnVZPuswg4yGjXTWcpg@comcast.com, "Jonathan Kaplan" <insure10nospam@nospamyahoo.com> wrote: > There is a bike shop in Old Saybrooke, CT that has many recumbents. I believe that they also had a > toureasy. There is a also a bike shop in Boston that sells recumbents. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
781-749-1968 MA-HINGHAM Harbor Cycle (Easy racers dealer). I used to own a toureasy. Great Bike. It rode very smoothly and was fast. I sold it to purchase my Penninger and Trimuter trikes. I'll try to find the Boston dealer for you. The one above came from the Easy racers website. "George Newton Jr" <george@georgenewton.com> wrote in message news:BAE26F75.6C3EA%george@georgenewton.com... > Thanks. Do you know the name or where in Boston that bike shop is. I have found Old Saybrooke Ct > on the map and I am going to drive down there to find > it. I would love to test ride the Toureasy. George > > On 5/10/03 12:23 AM, in article CJqdnVZPuswg4yGjXTWcpg@comcast.com, "Jonathan Kaplan" > <insure10nospam@nospamyahoo.com> wrote: > > > There is a bike shop in Old Saybrooke, CT that has many recumbents. I believe that they also had > > a toureasy. There is a also a bike shop in Boston > > that sells recumbents. > > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
George Newton Jr <george@georgenewton.com> wrote: > Hi, I was wondering if any one has had any experience with a Cannondale recumbent. Thanks in > advance, George Be sure to check out the reviews of the bike on Bentrider Online and Recumbent Cyclist News (I believe the review is in one of their sample issues). I have only taken the bike out on a short test ride, I found that it was very easy to ride both at low speed (Definitely a little friendlier at slow speeds than a full long wheel base bike, and easier for a first time recumbent rider than a SWB bike). I didn't get it up to much speed (maybe 20mph) but found its handling perfectly stable at that speed. Personally I think as long as you realize that this is not the bike you want to try to break world records on (unless the record happens to be time spent riding a bike) this is a wonderful (if a little pricey) first bent. Another bike with alot of the same features but a bit less pricey would be the HP Velo Spirit (I think it looks nicer, but that is definitely personal). -- Bill ********************************************************************** ***** We'll get along fine as soon as you realize I'm God. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Home page - http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~wmchal1 ********************************************************************** ***** |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
Hello George.... > 1) How does the bike compare, with it's 20/16 wheels, to bikes with larger wheels and Of all the recumbents I drove, the C-dale was the best handling. It was the only one of the sprung bents that did not bob. Part of the reason for this is C-dale's mid-drive. This device decouples front pedal torque at the rear pivot joint from making the bob. Most bents have just very long drive chain. The suspension system has open a number of roads in south Louisiana that I had abandoned for bicycling as their surfaces were way to rough for HP tires on a diamond bike. The rough roads are still energy sapping, but they no longer tear your joints from their sockets. > 2) if people have been happy with their Easyrider after a few months of riding The Easy has been the first recumbent I have owned. Over all I do like the bike, but I find it somewhat heavy. A better set of tires would help, thought the ones they supply will work on almost all road surfaces except maybe ice. Workmanship is excellent probably the best of any manufacturer. Braking; you almost need seatbelts and airbags! This was also my first bike with a rear disc brake. Even at 40 mph descent, the C-dale has gobs of brakes. Besides the tires (maybe the weight), my biggest dig against the C-dale is what I like to call the 'lawyer's pin' at the end of the seat rail. When mounting and dismount the seat from the rail (for transporting), you must remove/install the seat from the front. The rear pin prevents you from running the seat off the rear of the bike. It does help prevent someone from forgetting to engage the seat locks and running the seat off the back of the bike.... I rode the Burleys, and yes I thought they were pretty good too...I just thought the Easy was better. One bike I wish I did try was a sprung Rans SWB fully sprung. It looked very interesting, but most SWB were incredibly twitchy. Hope this helps, Nathan Gifford |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
william lingo <wpl4@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > I took a short test ride on the Cannondale and found it uninteresting. Not enough gears and it > does not handle that well. Your best bet would be to test ride as many models as you can and try > to do some hill climbs if you can. I found the Tour Easy the best handling bike of the ones I > tested, with the Sun Bicycles EZ Sport LE a close second. I hope this helps you. Good luck. I know > it's kind of hard to decide if you don't have a dealer in your area. On Fri, 09 May 2003 20:44:09 > GMT, George Newton Jr <george@georgenewton.com> wrote: I think you need to define your terms a bit better. Particularly what you mean by not handling well. Do you mean that the bike is unstable at low speed (Which I found it is very stable for a 2 wheeled recumbent), at highspeed? Or something else? While I wouldn't want to do the hilly hundred or the mountains of misery on the C-dale, I thought it climbed well enough to get up most hills that most riders would encounter in their daily rides. -- Bill ********************************************************************** ***** We'll get along fine as soon as you realize I'm God. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Home page - http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~wmchal1 ********************************************************************** ***** |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
The bike in question has been renamed the Cannondale Recumbent as anything recumbent related with "Easy" in it is usually associated with bicycles designed by Gardner Martin. Tom Sherman - Various HPV's Quad Cities USA (Illinois side) |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















