Go Back   Cycling Forums » General » The Bike Cafe
The Bike Cafe Have a good time, make new friends. Off topic chit chat belongs in here.













Steel is better? - Page 3

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-28.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 9
bbattle is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

Nowadays you can get steel tubing drawn down to .4mm(Columbus Foco, EL-OS, etc).

True Temper S3 steel is used to make sub-3 lb. frames.

If you've got the scratch, you can satisfy that itch.

here's the 2005 Columbus catalog. The Spirit tubing is .5mm/.38mm/.5mm
a suggested 54cm frame of 8 tubes will get you a 1060g frame.

That's scary light.

http://www.framebuilding.com/acrobat...us%2020054.pdf

Last edited by bbattle; 11-28.-2005 at 02:57 PM.
Reply With Quote


  #32  
Old 11-28.-2005
MichaelB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Liverpool
Age: 28
Posts: 236
Rep Power: 12
MichaelB
Default Re: Steel is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmichalek
If the material has an endurance limit, it's ignored. The reason being that most frame manufacturers don't warrant against fatigue in the first place. They have absolutely no financial interest in knowing what the endurance limit of their frame might be.
I doubt it. If they are interested in engineering a bike properly then they have to look at fatigue. Static loading is no good even if you pluck some fancy safety factor out of the air. Maybe you work for or know a frame manufacturer well and if they dont design for fatigue on something that is exposed to high cyclic stresses then they are poor engineers.
Reply With Quote


  #33  
Old 11-28.-2005
artmichalek's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Burlington, VT
Age: 27
Posts: 2,003
Rep Power: 19
artmichalek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
I doubt it. If they are interested in engineering a bike properly then they have to look at fatigue. Static loading is no good even if you pluck some fancy safety factor out of the air. Maybe you work for or know a frame manufacturer well and if they dont design for fatigue on something that is exposed to high cyclic stresses then they are poor engineers.
It depends on what you mean by a good engineer. Fatigue is not the only constraint placed on a frame design. Cost, weight, ride quality, and manufacturability all weigh in very heavily. Good engineering means understanding how to balance these constraints knowing that you can't ever meet all of them. Just because a bike frame doesn't have an infinite fatigue life doesn't mean that it wasn't designed for fatigue. But a rough estimate is about as much as anyone needs. There are a lot of variables, and they're all stochastic. Infinite fatigue life for all outlying combinations is never going to happen. Some amount of judgement is needed to ballpark an "acceptable" life span for the product. Sure, you could design a steel frame to last forever, but the bike buying public has decided that it's not going to lay down several thousand dollars for a ten pound road frame.

Believe the numbers: http://www.efbe.de/testergebnisse/enindex.php
EFBe has yet to test a frame made out of any material that didn't break break under cyclic loading at some point.
Reply With Quote


  #34  
Old 11-30.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Mexico
Age: 49
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0
TeleVizedPayne is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

The lugs, don't forget the beautiful lugs, the quill stems, the thin tubes, the retro look, the snob appeal in a retro kind of way.....
__________________
Jamis Aurora, Jamis Coda Comp
Reply With Quote


  #35  
Old 12-01.-2005
Wurm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Rep Power: 19
Wurm is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

Welp, I have a Columbus Zona steel frame, and it's really the best handling, best riding frame I've yet owned. I've had very good aluminum and titanium frames such as C'dale, Litespeed, K2, but not carbon yet.

This Zona is very stiff, almost too stiff at the rear, but it doesn't beat me up over longer rides. I have no problems doing metric and full centuries on this frame.

Weight is good - around 19 lbs. for 56cm, with a mostly Chorus group, but not the lightest wheels (1678gm/pr.), brakes (Centaur), saddle (Brooks Swift), or BB (Truvativ GP Team SL) just as examples. It wouldn't be too hard to get this rig to sub-18 lbs., which is very good for a steel bike. Unfortunately, I didn't have a means to weigh just the frame before I assembled it.

I'll probably keep this one for a long time.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Reply With Quote


  #36  
Old 12-01.-2005
MichaelB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Liverpool
Age: 28
Posts: 236
Rep Power: 12
MichaelB
Default Re: Steel is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmichalek
It depends on what you mean by a good engineer. Fatigue is not the only constraint placed on a frame design. Cost, weight, ride quality, and manufacturability all weigh in very heavily. Good engineering means understanding how to balance these constraints knowing that you can't ever meet all of them. Just because a bike frame doesn't have an infinite fatigue life doesn't mean that it wasn't designed for fatigue. But a rough estimate is about as much as anyone needs. There are a lot of variables, and they're all stochastic. Infinite fatigue life for all outlying combinations is never going to happen. Some amount of judgement is needed to ballpark an "acceptable" life span for the product. Sure, you could design a steel frame to last forever, but the bike buying public has decided that it's not going to lay down several thousand dollars for a ten pound road frame.

Believe the numbers: http://www.efbe.de/testergebnisse/enindex.php
EFBe has yet to test a frame made out of any material that didn't break break under cyclic loading at some point.
I didn't mean they should design bikes that never fatigue. That would mean steel bikes really would be king! I responding to the other poster's post that manufaturers dont care about fatigue. I was suggesting they must at least do some form of fatigue analysis to be credible otherwise they could have either a well over the top or under designed bike. You cant tell just by guessing
Reply With Quote


  #37  
Old 12-01.-2005
artmichalek's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Burlington, VT
Age: 27
Posts: 2,003
Rep Power: 19
artmichalek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
I was suggesting they must at least do some form of fatigue analysis to be credible otherwise they could have either a well over the top or under designed bike. You cant tell just by guessing
The best steel bikes in the world are still the ones that are hand built in small shops. I'll bet any amount of money that Richard Sachs doesn't sit down and do fatigue calculations every time he starts out a made to order frame. This is one of those cases where experience and intuition are far superior to any type of analysis.
Reply With Quote


  #38  
Old 12-02.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gaffney SC
Age: 34
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 0
SCDETAILER is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

For all you guys out there talking about weight of steel, check out Indy Fabs new bike in Road magazine. Now I know that this thing is built with some very high end parts, but it still weighs 16 lbs. I am riding a steel Lemond right now that is my father's. I thought that the weight would hinder me, but the ride quality and the comfort have helped me ride farther and harder. My next bike may just be a new steel custom frame. I do not get into the lugged ones though. I love the ride. Granted I have not ridden but one carbon bike and it was a TREK. I am looking to get a test ride on a Colnago C-50 which I have read is the pinnacle by which a lot of frames are compared. For the price of a C-50 set up though I could get a nice custom steel from Serotta, Indy Fab, Steelman........


Bruce
Reply With Quote


  #39  
Old 12-06.-2005
Wurm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Rep Power: 19
Wurm is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCDETAILER
My next bike may just be a new steel custom frame.
You mentioned Serotta. They just brought back their Coeur d'Acier for 2006. This is good! It's Columbus Niobium, but whether it's Spirit or Life or some combination I don't know. Custom geom is no charge, but various paint schemes are an upcharge.

http://www.serotta.com/pages/cda.html

Attached Thumbnails
Steel is better?-cda_06-jpg  
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Reply With Quote


  #40  
Old 12-06.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gaffney SC
Age: 34
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 0
SCDETAILER is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

I also noticed that Orbea has a steel bike now with carbon seat stays. I do not know if you can get it in custom geometry, but I think that may be an option. It is the same tubing, and it is called the spirit. You can also get it without carbon.


Bruce
Reply With Quote


  #41  
Old 12-06.-2005
Wurm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Rep Power: 19
Wurm is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCDETAILER
I also noticed that Orbea has a steel bike now with carbon seat stays. I do not know if you can get it in custom geometry, but I think that may be an option. It is the same tubing, and it is called the spirit. You can also get it without carbon.


Bruce
Yes, I've been looking at that one too. It's a better price @ $1399. w. CF stays than the CDA @ $1599. The Spirit with steel stays is only $999. You can get custom geom for +$100. with the Spirit. The CDA can also be had with or w/o CF stays, but I don't know if the $1599. is the all-steel or CF version.

So, if the Orbea's stock geom is right for you, you can save at least $200. over the Serotta. It wouldn't be for me, so I'd have to pay the $100. for custom.

Then there's the paint scheme. The Orbea comes OEM with either black/white or blue/white, and I'm not sure if they want an upcharge for something different. Serotta does charge more for non-OEM paint.
Attached Thumbnails
Steel is better?-orbea_spiritchorus_280_05_p-jpg  
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Reply With Quote


  #42  
Old 12-07.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gaffney SC
Age: 34
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 0
SCDETAILER is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Steel is better?

I am not as much worried about the paint as I am about the geometry. That is good to know that they will do the custom geometry. I was told that they would do it on the alum. models, but not the carbon fiber. I did not even know that they had a steel bike.


Bruce
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
steel

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.
Translations by vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish