Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18.-2005
Walrus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 867
Rep Power: 6
Walrus
Default Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

These 2 racing tyres from Conti have various advantages and technologies, but I'm unclear as to which tyre is suited to which riding? Can anyone explain what riding each tyre would suit best?

Conti GP 4000
Attack/Force
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 339
Rep Power: 6
WINGNUTT is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus
These 2 racing tyres from Conti have various advantages and technologies, but I'm unclear as to which tyre is suited to which riding? Can anyone explain what riding each tyre would suit best?

Conti GP 4000
Attack/Force
Did you see this chart on their site?
http://www.conti-tyres.co.uk/conticy...pplication.pdf
The Attack looks like it's made of rubber that's just a nut hair softer than the 3000 (now the 4000), so it will have a bit better grip, but more susceptible to wear and punctures.

Probably makes no difference whatsoever in reality. I've always run the Grand Prix 3000 tires and have had very good luck with them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18.-2005
cydewaze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Age: 44
Posts: 881
Rep Power: 6
cydewaze is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

If it were me I'd go with the 4000. The 3000 was/is an excellent tire, and I'm sure the 4000 will be as good or better. The Attack Force looks interesting, but I'm not convinced that tread does much good on a bike tire to begin with. If you get the AF combo, make sure you can get the rear seperately, since they'll be wearing out more quickly than the front.

Personally, I prefer the same tire front and rear, because when I replace the rear I usually put the new one on the front and move the old front to the rear. That way I always have fairly new rubber on the front.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18.-2005
Walrus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 867
Rep Power: 6
Walrus
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

Quote:
Originally Posted by cydewaze
Personally, I prefer the same tire front and rear, because when I replace the rear I usually put the new one on the front and move the old front to the rear. That way I always have fairly new rubber on the front.
That's a good point. I know on my current set I had a worn section on the rear tyre, so I switched it to the front for peace of mind.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18.-2005
MY02_STi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 233
Rep Power: 6
MY02_STi
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

I used the GP Force/Attack combo and found them to be a very good tyre but extremely prone to wear AND punctures. Have since ditched them and am now using the GP 4000s, which feel a little more 'together' than the Force/Attack combo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18.-2005
dhk dhk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Huntsville, AL
Age: 62
Posts: 2,246
Rep Power: 9
dhk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

Quote:
Originally Posted by MY02_STi
I used the GP Force/Attack combo and found them to be a very good tyre but extremely prone to wear AND punctures. Have since ditched them and am now using the GP 4000s, which feel a little more 'together' than the Force/Attack combo
I've also been using the 3000s for club riding and training. They been a great road tire for me, with long wear and no punctures in about 10,000 miles. Not cheap, but worth the money.

Believe the Force/Attack combo is Conti's race tire set, which means they are designed for high grip and light weight, not for long wear or puncture resistance. I'd use them for crit racing, but not for daily road riding.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
jimmer23 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhk
Believe the Force/Attack combo is Conti's race tire set, which means they are designed for high grip and light weight, not for long wear or puncture resistance. I'd use them for crit racing, but not for daily road riding.
The Attack/Force is a fine set for training or racing. The 23mm tire in rear is great for a little extra grip and cushioning (while still being extremely light at around 200g), and the front is slightly thinner for minimal aero benefit. Have 1000 miles on the current set with no noticable wear - both racing and training. Not one puncture yet and they have a ton of bite.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19.-2005
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 386
Rep Power: 5
domaindomain is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Conti GP 4000 vs Attack/Force

Attack force is more for racing, GP4000 is an all round fast training / racing tyre.

Expect more durability from the 4000 but that's about it really I expect.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
4000, attack or force, conti

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish