Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Trek 2300 vs Cannondale R1000 - Page 2

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-29.-2003
Just a rider
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 0
shokhead1
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Deejay
This is a very interesting debate. About a year ago I had money down on a 'dale R500 (CAAD 3) but didn't complete as we moved house - blew the deposit on new SPD shoes, and parts for my mtb (just had my first crash and wanted some upgrades to make myself feel better ) Haven't done much (any) riding for a while (busted knee, work etc.) but now coming 'round to buying a road bike again, though this time with a bigger budget. So, I am thinking 'dale R1000 vs. Trek 2300 (or 5200 maybe ) vs. 853 custom steel and damn well equipped (FYI - 2300 is £1500, R1000 is £1700, Steel is...however much I want to pay for it

Issues:

1) Rider weight - 195lbs
2) Frame weight vs. comfort
3) Wheel package
4) Upgradability - what deals I can work with the shop
5) Colour (sorry, just don't like the R1000 colours. Now, the R800, that looks sweet!)

Any comments/input greatly appreciated. Deal won't be done for a couple of months, so plenty of time to give me your two cents worth!

Cheers,

Deej
04's are coming with some new colors.
Reply With Quote


  #17  
Old 07-29.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 7
trembler50
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by shokhead1
04's are coming with some new colors.
I have both steel and Aluminium frames, but have to say that given the choice I would always buy a Cannondale.

I have two Cannondale Mountain Bikes, one 10 years old and a Cannondal road bike.

They are stiff, light, comfortable, responsive and durable. What more can you ask.

I'm not convinced about CODA parts though, which were on my original MTB and did not work as well as Shimano. My road bike is 105 and Ultegra which is fine for me. The MTB's are all Shimano.
Reply With Quote


  #18  
Old 07-31.-2003
Insight Driver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sacramento, California
Age: 56
Posts: 489
Rep Power: 7
Insight Driver
Default

Interesting topic. Trek and Cannondale are both good bikes but around Sacramento California and at this time of year it seems Giant bikes have the best bang for the buck.
Reply With Quote


  #19  
Old 07-31.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 7
trembler50
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Insight Driver
Interesting topic. Trek and Cannondale are both good bikes but around Sacramento California and at this time of year it seems Giant bikes have the best bang for the buck.
The "Best bang for buck" issue is an interesting one.

Most of us have to go through this phase of our lives until we have enough money to do the right thin g and follow our hearts.

Some people are lucky enough (either financially or emotionally) to always have that attitude.

It took me a long time, and I still succumb occasionally to it, but I am gradually learning to ignore my head and listen to my heart.

Then I buy another Cannondale (Saab/Leica, whatever).

Once done you never regret it.
Reply With Quote


  #20  
Old 08-01.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 0
Scuba Steve
Default

A few years ago I would have bought the TREK hands down. For once, I actually considered my options and really shopped around in the same price range. IMO, the Cannondale is a better value although it wasn't completely spec'ed w/ full Ultegra, the frame was much better. Upgrading the front der, brakes and B/B would be easy, fairly cheap and you could do it at your own pace. The 2300 is a nice bike and very appealing to the eye, but this time, I let my seat of the pants make my decision for me. Too me, the Cannondale just rode better.

Scuba Steve
Reply With Quote


  #21  
Old 08-01.-2003
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
celliot2001
Default

exactly. i was like, "you can't size me here on the bike but you want me to fork over 20% for a delivery of a bike i've never been on." i have a triathlon friend who recently purchased a cyclocross in reston, va and he was in the same situation. he's 6'3" and they (another bike shop) didn't have a cycle in his size and he went ahead and took the plunge on a bike he'd never ridden. i know nova's out of wack economically (hell, they just put in a ferrari dealership two miles from my job) and they have people who will just show up and drop mad loot without a second thought, but i can't commit 20% on something i've never ridden. i'm going back to the shop in my town and ask them if they'll just bring a giro in for me to test ride, no questions asked -- i'll let you know what pans out. i'm going to buy a bike, so they should give me some room to work with. at least that's my hope.
Reply With Quote


  #22  
Old 08-17.-2003
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
griffin
Default

I came to the same conclusion. The Cannondale is a great frame for the money, $1450 at SuperGo. After pricing out upgrades, however, the R2000 for $1750 was looking like a good deal:
wheels - Mavic Ksyrium SSC SL, full Ultegra except for Rear Derailleur: Shimano Dura-Ace. Full Dura-Ace on the R3000 at $3000 was more than I wanted to pay.

The shop recommend the double since it shifted much nicer. (?) I didn't notice much of a difference at the time. So far, the shop has been good about sizing the bike properly and swapping out components. This is as important to me as choosing the bike itself.


Quote:
Originally posted by Scuba Steve
IMO, the Cannondale is a better value although it wasn't completely spec'ed w/ full Ultegra, the frame was much better. Upgrading the front der, brakes and B/B would be easy, fairly cheap and you could do it at your own pace.
Scuba Steve
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2300, cannondale, r1000, trek

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish