Is a 30mm rim "aero" enough

I'm considering a set of "aero" road wheels and want to get some opinion on whether 30mm rims offer a reasonable aero advantage? I would be riding these wheels on flat, straight roads. I currently ride 22mm rims...will I notice a difference going to 30mm? Should I look for something bigger, like 40 or 50? The reason I ask is that there are some very affordable wheels with 30mm rims, but anything bigger seems to jump a lot in price.

Is there any literature on how high the rim needs to be before benefits can be worthwhile?

I would have a look at 50mm rims if you want the aero effect. I think the HED Jet 50 is a pretty reasonable $995.

http://www.hedcycling.com/wheels/jet50.php

Perhaps John can answer your question. http://www.cycling.net.au/t350127.html

__________________
Training Log

You would need to couple them up with skinny 19-20mm tyres to have the best effect. I use Velocity Deep-V on my Try bike with 23mm tyres, its slightly faster than standard wheels but for me its not worth paying $$500 more (for Hed).

__________________
Cheers,
George.

I guess the bottom line is that you're unlikely to notice much difference with a 30mm deep rim. If you do buy some, and they feel faster, it would most likely be coz you'd have brand new hubs, and the fact that 30mm rims are noticeably stiffer.

My 30mm rims are all faster than my 20-24mm rims...however the 30mm rims have less spokes which is probably the reason.

I like the Jet's, but they are 4.5 times more expensive than something like Easton Vista's which you can get for $220 a set. So the question is, given there are such cheap 30mm rims available, will there be any significant aero effect. Obviously hub quality etc comes into it as well.

The problem with aero rims above 30mm is that there is often a weight penalty, so if your'e not doing tt's or flat road riding I think going something like the HED I suggested is overkill. I don't think there is any difference from aero point of view between a 30 and your22mm rims. If your not too heavy I think a light set of hubs and rims would be a good place to get the performance gains your seeking or even changing your tyres and tubes can reduce weight and rolling resistance.

Reynolds Stratus DV Tubulars: 46mm deep rim; sturdy and everyday useable; and at 1258g (actual weight for my set), no weight penalty. Muy nice.

According to Zipp and Hed, you need more than 30mm to get aero benefits (the Zipp303 are more than 30mm deep, despite the naming convention, and 40mm seems to be the favored rim depth). Of course, even with 24mm or 30mm rims, you can get some aero benefit by reducing spoke count, but your question related to rim depth. But as has been pointed out, deeper aluminum rims carry a weight penalty, and I doubt you would see any benefit by going from 24mm to 30mm rims, unless you drop spoke count in the process. The deeper aero wheels are all carbon fiber, which is why the price jumps up; unfortunately there is a lot of truth in the old "you get what you pay for."

Is there a price penalty though ?

Let me offer a direct comparison. I have a very nice wheelset, and I know that these aero's I'm considering won't compare in quality to what I currently have...I'm interested in whether I'll notice a difference in effort required on flat roads due to the aero profile. Also, having these wheels will mean I'm riding my "good" climbing wheels less during training.

Current Wheelset: DT Swiss 1450 22mm rim, 32 spoke, 1450g, std profile
Proposed Wheelset: Easton Vista = 30mm rim, 20/24 spoke, 1797g, parobolic aero profile.

To investigate, I've used this calculator (http://www.2peak.com/tools/powercalculator.php) substituting my DT's for Mavic SL's (very similar) and the Eastons for Citec 3000's (also very simliar). The result was that at 30kph, I would only save 3 watts by riding the aero wheel. Not much, but when you consider there's a 350g+ weight difference...it shows that there is a benefit.

I think he was just disputing the comment that rims above 30mm weigh more. Obviously the Reynolds are more expensive.

Only 3 watts!!!

As I said in my earlier post, a smooth skinny tyre at the front will do more, Conti Attack or GP4000.

Remember at 30kph the top of the tyre is doing 60kph, so tread drag is important.

__________________
Cheers,
George.

Good point. Those tyres you mentioned would be my first choices.

3 watts is basically nothing I know, it's just interesting that despite the weight diff, the aero's still outperform.