Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 386
Rep Power: 12
domaindomain is on a distinguished road
Default Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

The Vittoria EVO claims a weight of 55g which, for a butyl tube must be as light as they come....

Do you prefer these or to just go the whole hog with latex?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 490
Rep Power: 9
kleng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by domaindomain
The Vittoria EVO claims a weight of 55g which, for a butyl tube must be as light as they come....

Do you prefer these or to just go the whole hog with latex?
I've used both Vittoria Latex and the EVO, I found the EVO to be quite fragile, the latex is in my opinion the better investment.
Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 04-12.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 386
Rep Power: 12
domaindomain is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

I have heard exactly the opposite too - that the butyl is more durable....

one vote each then so far!
Reply With Quote


  #4  
Old 04-12.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Thornbury, Vic
Age: 31
Posts: 804
Rep Power: 11
parawolf is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by domaindomain
The Vittoria EVO claims a weight of 55g which, for a butyl tube must be as light as they come....
Continental SuperSonic at 50grams are lighter

I find that the EVO's lose pressure quickly; the SuperSonics are far better in that regard in my opinion.
Reply With Quote


  #5  
Old 04-12.-2007
bobbyOCR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WA, in Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 1,349
Rep Power: 14
bobbyOCR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Supersonics are great. They don't lose air too quickly, they are very light and easy to install. Latex tubes are more comfortable, more temperamental, faster, harder to repair and lose air quickly. Tyres usually need to be powdered before installing a latex tube. They are made for racing.
__________________
BMC SL01
SRAM Force



thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles.
Reply With Quote


  #6  
Old 04-12.-2007
mwestray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0
mwestray
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Quote:
They are made for racing.
Disagree! It's true that latex tubes need to be pumped up to correct pressure daily, but that's the only downside. They are perfectly fine for everyday use. They are MUCH less susceptible to punctures and pinch-flats than the ultralight (and ultra thin) butyl tubes. When used with high quality tires they provide performance that rivals tubulars. I've logged a ton of miles using Michelin Airstop Latex tubes with Michelin Pro Race, Veloflex Pave, Gommitalia Calypso, and now Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX without a flat. And latex tubes are as easily fixed with glueless patches as butyl. And really, all tubes (latex or butyl) and the interior of tires should be dusted with talc prior to mounting. It makes tire mounting easier and lets the tube and tire shift independently of each other in response to road conditions and manuvering, improving ride quality and durability.
Reply With Quote


  #7  
Old 04-12.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 490
Rep Power: 9
kleng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mwestray
Disagree! It's true that latex tubes need to be pumped up to correct pressure daily, but that's the only downside. They are perfectly fine for everyday use. They are MUCH less susceptible to punctures and pinch-flats than the ultralight (and ultra thin) butyl tubes. When used with high quality tires they provide performance that rivals tubulars. I've logged a ton of miles using Michelin Airstop Latex tubes with Michelin Pro Race, Veloflex Pave, Gommitalia Calypso, and now Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX without a flat. And latex tubes are as easily fixed with glueless patches as butyl. And really, all tubes (latex or butyl) and the interior of tires should be dusted with talc prior to mounting. It makes tire mounting easier and lets the tube and tire shift independently of each other in response to road conditions and manuvering, improving ride quality and durability.
+1 I used to get a lot of pinch flats with lightweight butyl tubes like the EVO, with the Vittoria latex I haven't had a flat or blow out in using them for 2 years. They also have a more supple ride and are supposed to reduce rolling resistance. The small downside is having to top them up before every ride and the price compared to butyl tubes, but since I've never had to replace them, their worth the extra cost. Performance with a supple tire like the Michelin Pro Race 2 Special edition is excellent.
Reply With Quote


  #8  
Old 04-12.-2007
mikesbytes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ashfield, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 1,712
Rep Power: 14
mikesbytes is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by parawolf
Continental SuperSonic at 50grams are lighter

I find that the EVO's lose pressure quickly; the SuperSonics are far better in that regard in my opinion.
I didn't have any luck with the SuperSonic I used, it split. Perhaps I was unlucky.
__________________
Training Log

Reply With Quote


  #9  
Old 04-12.-2007
bobbyOCR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WA, in Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 1,349
Rep Power: 14
bobbyOCR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Okay, I know all the lower RR higher comfort is true about latex but a few things about butyl tubes......

If a sharp pointy thing is sharp and pointy enough to get through a tyre casing, a tube sure as hell ain't gonna stop it, indiscriminate of type (okay maybe thorn-proof tubes, but they weigh in the realm of 400g for a tube), they are too thin. If the sharp thing nicks the tube, it'll produce a weak spot which 100psi will love to attack and will form a hole eventually. So, there is logic in ultra-light ultra-thin tubes.

I don't know how low you go with your pressures, how heavy you are or how crap you are at hopping curbs, pinch flatting a tyre @ 100psi+ is extremely unlikely. I haven't even managed to pinch flat 25psi MTB (1.95 width) tyres with my appalling log hopping. If you are talking about pinch flatting putting a tyre on, practice it more and buy some michelin tyre levers, or continental, they are the same.

Defining pinch flatting. Pinching the tube against the edge of the rim after a serious impact, causing the rim to pierce the tube????

If you are using a different definition, please tell me, cause As far as I know it is damn near impossible to pinch flat a narrow, very high pressure tyre under normal circumstances.
__________________
BMC SL01
SRAM Force



thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles.
Reply With Quote


  #10  
Old 04-12.-2007
bobbyOCR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WA, in Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 1,349
Rep Power: 14
bobbyOCR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Very light butyl tubes vs latex...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesbytes
I didn't have any luck with the SuperSonic I used, it split. Perhaps I was unlucky.
It must have been bad luck. I can see that there would be some margin for factory error in that aspect.
__________________
BMC SL01
SRAM Force



thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
butyl, latex, light, tubes

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.
Translated to other languages thanks to vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish