| Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel? |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
I suggest getting fulcrum over Mavics but for god's sake A GOOD SET OF HANDBUILT WHEELS WILL PERFORM BETTER THAN THAT MAVIC MASS MARKETED CRAP. And the Fulcrums too. FOR ABOuT HALF THE COST.
__________________ BMC SL01 SRAM Force thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
I think the problem is that these two wheels (Ksyrium SL and Fuclrum Racing 1) do not have the typical design elements for good performance. My testing and other's data would support this. In general, there are trends which suggest how a wheel will perform. - Deeper rims will have better aerodynamics and will be stiffer laterally. They will tend to be a bit heavier though. - Fewer spokes will be better aerodynamically, but will make the wheel less laterally stiff. Lateral stiffness may affect how the wheel feels, but unless it causes the rim to rub the brake pads it has little affect on performance. - The size and shape of a spoke will affect the aerodynamics. Thin spokes are better than thick. Aero is better than round. - Hub and bearing quality can save you a few watts. The major sources of bearing drag are bearing alignment/adjustment, seal drag, and your choice of grease. Improving these things can save you watts, but can affect how often you need to maintain or replace your bearings (thin grease and no bearing seals means water and grit can penetrate). Going to ceramic bearings will save you very little. - Starting with a straight rim, using brand name spokes, and properly tensioning the spokes will prevent the wheel from coming out of true and/or breaking spokes. If you are very heavy then you should tend to a stiffer rim and more spokes to prevent the wheel from coming out of true and/or breaking spokes. Keeping those things in mind, you should be able to pick a good pre-built wheel or have one custom built for you. An example of a wheel that combines the good design elements described above and tests well is the Shimano 7801-SL. An example of a wheel that does not use the good design elements described above and does not test well is the Ksyrium SL. I hope this is helpful. John Swanson www.bikephysics.com |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
wow, your testing is pretty interesting. scientific and interesting. how do you test the wheels to get the data? are you planning on testing the fulcrum 1's or ksyrium sl? i was looking at the 7801 SL's but they just didn't have the bling factor, shallow i know, but I like to tart my bike up a little |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
If you are looking for a bling wheel, those two sets fit the bill perfectly. If you are looking for a good wheel, DTRR1.1, Open Pro, Velocity aerohead, or Alex Crostini (I like aerohead and Mavic. I had a bad experience with DT rims) rims laced to DA or Record rear hubs if you run shimano or campy, with something like a white industries front, or any light, good hub. Or you can go both White Industries, but currently DA hubs are comparitively cheap (if you look) for their quality level. Then use some great spokes and you turn out with a wheelset hanging around 1400g.
__________________ BMC SL01 SRAM Force thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Check the drag figures of the Ksyrium before you buy one, however - you won't be impressed.
__________________ "All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..." |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
I'd agree with dhk and go so far as to say that there isn't much difference between Ultegra and 105 hubs.
__________________ "All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..." |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ BMC SL01 SRAM Force thank you crank n' cycles...If you are ever in SW WA, take a trip to Crank N' Cycles. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
I personally think the campy/fulcrum wheels have far more bling than mavics. The G3 rear wheel stands out a mile, even non cyclists will stop and look. Mavics are a dime a dozen due to OEM specs. Campy or fulcrum gives you something a little different but looks and performs extremely well. 7801s look more "classic" and is a sleeper as far as performance/looks go, spec if you run the new tubeless tyres with them. Are DA hubs going cheap because they are due to be updated next year and shimano have a large stock of them? 7801 wheels have different bearings to 7800 wheels.
__________________ Precision Sports |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
Fulcrum 1 owner here (formerly running Ksyrium Elites). Looked at the DT Swiss 1.1 on 240s hubs as well. Compared the F1s to the Ksyrium SLs in the decision as well. The superior hubs in the F1s were the reason the SLs lost out. ES not considered as no real difference mechanically for the $ to the SLs. The DT Swiss 1.1/240 lost out on the basis that it was more expensive than the F1s (locally in Aust) The F1 spokes widen toward the rim and I find they perform better in strong winds than the Elites did. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ "All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..." |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ "All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..." |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| fulcrum, ksyrium, mavic |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.
Languages translations supported by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Languages translations supported by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com













Linear Mode


















