| Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel? |
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I want more comfort for longer rides so I reversed my stem to the upside. This strikes me as something that will make the bike less stable / manuverable. My question is whether there is any material difference between reversing the stem (as I have done) and buying a new frame that has a taller head tube of exactly the same height difference as my flipped stem? For whatever reason I feel the taller head tube would be more stable / safe. Any of you engineers care to prove me wrong? Mike Wesler |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
Your stem has zero to do with the bike's stability. Weight distribution, frame geometry, and fork geometry are what contribute to stability. By flipping the stem you've done nothing to change any of that. Sure, weight distribution might change some miniscule amount, but it won't be anything you'll notice....ever. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
Quote:
I disagree with your hypothesis about 'miniscule' changes in weight distribution. I once flipped the stem on an already oversized bike and it became downright dangerous (IMO). Mike |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
#7
| |||
| |||
I convert and build flat bar bikes, the stem makes more difference than changing the seat post! I use a set of bathroom scales under the front wheel for all weight calculations. NO ONE gets out of here with less than 35% of the gross weight on the front wheel! I found if you go higher with the steerer tube you have to go longer with the stem. The Stem Riser with the original stem, droped, or a longer adjustable stem, may be the answer.
__________________ Cheers, George. Last edited by gclark8; 06-25.-2007 at 08:08 PM. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
For the OP, I would say, try the bike with the flipped stem and keep it if you think it is comfortable and stable. You'll notice any loss of stability, but I doubt that there will be one.
__________________ "All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..." |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
I should know better to argue with an alias called "alienator" but I feel this needs to be addressed. YOU ARE WRONG, period. I just rode my bike with the flipped stem and didn’t notice all that much difference. There was, however, a difference. It was not huge, it was not very very slight as you claim it should be; there was a moderately different ride quality. This was on an undersized bike, so the flipped stem returned me to a more normalized center of gravity. When I flipped the stem on my former oversized bike it became, as I have said, downright dangerous. I noted this danger while coming down a mountain at 35 miles per hour. And no, it was not because I was going so fast or the road quality was poor. It was because my center of gravity was too high. I will reply to your postings no further. MRW Quote:
|
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
FWIW, I did not piss in your Cheerios. I gave you objective, factual answers. Since we're talking about objectivity, it's important to point out how bad your little "experiment" was. It proved nothing, other than your too stupid to actually do a valuable test. I have--as have tens of thousands, if not more, of other cyclists--have flipped stems without changing stability one iota. Of course, that's because stem angle has virtually **** to do with stability. Given the tone of your response, I think it's safe to say that you wouldn't come close to understanding a scientific or mathematical answer, so suffice it to say that your knowledge of bike stability is as inadequate, at least, as your ability to read tone in a forum post. Of course, the makers of stems and bikes know that flipping a stem does sod all to change stability, but that doesn't mean a dolt like you does. Piss off, princess. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
Regardless on the issue on stability, an A-Head type system with the stem clamp as near as possible to the upper headset is safer since this puts less strain on the steerer tube in this area where it is most prone to failure (failure like Hincapie's crash at paris-roubaix).
__________________ |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
|
#14
| |||
| |||
Quote:
I would like more information before giving a specific answer: What exacty is the bike, pix please? Post a link to the bike's Geometry, please. What size is the bike? How are you set up, seat position, seat height, stem length, crank length, pedal type? Pedaling style, lo or hi cadence, heel or toe down? Your height? Your weight? Your Age? All this will help in getting back on topic and giving you an informed answer. (see also set up pix in Post 7 above)
__________________ Cheers, George. Last edited by gclark8; 07-01.-2007 at 04:06 PM. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
Quote:
If you follow the logic of the previous arguements, then all riders must be on the same (small) size bike, to keep the weight low. (This week I'll ride "Little Jackie's" 24" Wheel Huffy)
__________________ Cheers, George. Last edited by gclark8; 07-01.-2007 at 04:13 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| head, reversed, safer, stem, taller, tube |
« UCI cap
|
Trek 6.5 SSL »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com








.





Linear Mode

















