| Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel? |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
http://www.salsacycles.com/materials.html |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Too many for me to list. Yes. Google is your friend: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...=bike+scandium
__________________ "There is alot of blather here that does not float the hooey barge." boudreaux 11/22/2005 |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
Quote:
In theory, scandium aluminum may have a slight strength improvement over standard 7005 aluminum, so in theory a framebuilder could use thinner/lighter-walled tubing with equivalent strength and fatigue-life. IMO, it's more important to get the tube dimensions and wall thickness (eg frame weight) appropriate to your riding and goals than to be concerned about the micro-alloying elements the tubing contains. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Last edited by alienator; 10-05.-2007 at 08:57 PM. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
Scandium adds strenth to aluminum. Strength is a good thing to have in a bicycle frame. ![]() Scandium makes for welds less prone to failure from grain crystalization: "The Al-Sc phase diagram below shows the Al-Al3Sc eutectic reaction to take place at an unusually high temperature. This high solidification temperature improves heterogeneous nucleation of grains, resulting in a refined grain size (and reduced hot cracking). A reduction in hot cracking is especially important for welding of high strength alloys. Most of the highest strength aluminum alloys are not weldable and the the addition of Sc can improve the weldability of many of these alloys." ElementRecrystallization Temp. (C)Mn 325Cr325Zr400Sc600 ![]() If a "correct" tube shape is more desireable, scandium also improves the workability of the tube by mechanical processes. "Perhaps a more important aspect of the greater thermal stability of the Al3Sc dispersoids is their effectiveness at reducing recrystallization. Alloys that are heavily cold worked (such as extruded and/or drawn bats, bike frames, and tubes) contain sufficient stored energy to cause recrystallization. This results in substantial strength loss. Designers know that thin-walled products have less strength than thicker sections due to this softening effect. The addition of Sc can eliminate this problem in many combinations of alloy, heat treatment, and mechanical working." I guess my question would be is why would anyone want an aluminum frame that is manufactured without scandium as an alloying agent? |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
CB, I'm no metallurgist, and have never understood the "eutectic point". But forgive me for being skeptical of your quoted material. Could you provide your reference please? In particular, the declaration that "Sc can eliminate this problem...." sounds like ad copy to me. If the addition of Sc was really a big deal, believe we'd have a new series of Al to describe it, and it would be widely used by Columbus and every other leading maker of aluminum tubesets for frames. When I was shopping for frame tubing in 2003, Easton was the only maker I recall having "scandium"; perhaps there are others now. I was under the impression that the "artificial aging" as specified by the 7005 series tube maker (after welding) is sufficient to stabilize the grain structure if the frame builder does it properly. At any rate, believe the cited advantages to Sc addition are insignificant compared to the shape, size and wall thickness choices that a framebuilder makes. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| frame, kind, material |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 PM.
Multilingual forum supported by vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Multilingual forum supported by vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com















Linear Mode


















