Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 46
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 0
CAD2 will become famous soon enough
Default Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

Hi Guys,
am wondering if its OK to replace a shimano 600 crankset and bottom bracket with a 105 crankset and bottom bracket (octalink)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14.-2007
artemidorus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,257
Rep Power: 21
artemidorus will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

Yes, as long as you get the correct BB for your frame.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 10-14.-2007
kdelong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,151
Rep Power: 15
kdelong will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

+1. I've done it and it works. You might need to adjust your derailer mounting a little if you are going to use chainrings with different tooth counts than what you originally had.
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it!
Reply With Quote


  #4  
Old 10-14.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,828
Rep Power: 20
alfeng will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAD2
am wondering if its OK to replace a shimano 600 crankset and bottom bracket with a 105 crankset and bottom bracket (octalink)?
FWIW. Depending on the situation where you are (specifically, eBay), it might be slightly better (more economical in the long run) to look for an Ultegra crankset because:
  • the Ultegra chainrings are better (i.e., nickel-plated == longer wearing)
  • the Ultegra crank comes with self-extracting bolts
In North America, the price difference (new OR used) isn't very large (or, not as large as the cost differential for the rings & bolts ... way-back-when, when NEW, the difference was only about $20US [the cost of the self-extracting bolts, alone] & the chainrings probably cost 50% more) -- so, the 105 Octalink crankset is is one of the 105 components which isn't the bargain one might presume or hope for.

I've got an unused 105 Octalink BB as a spare in my toolbox, so I cannot tell you if it is signifcantly better-or-worse than the Ultegra/DA bottom brackets, but my reckoning is that the difference is mostly cosmetic (and, cost).

I actually prefer the 112.5mm XTR Octalink because it means I can readily move between a double & a triple crankset (a discovery made through laziness) whereby I only need to adjust the front derailleur's inner stop (after switching cranks, that is). The XT & LX Octalinks have a different spline pattern, in case you were wondering.
Reply With Quote


  #5  
Old 10-14.-2007
kdelong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,151
Rep Power: 15
kdelong will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfeng
FWIW. Depending on the situation where you are (specifically, eBay), it might be slightly better (more economical in the long run) to look for an Ultegra crankset because:
  • the Ultegra chainrings are better (i.e., nickel-plated == longer wearing)
  • the Ultegra crank comes with self-extracting bolts
In North America, the price difference (new OR used) isn't very large (or, not as large as the cost differential for the rings & bolts ... way-back-when, when NEW, the difference was only about $20US [the cost of the self-extracting bolts, alone] & the chainrings probably cost 50% more) -- so, the 105 Octalink crankset is is one of the 105 components which isn't the bargain one might presume or hope for.

I've got an unused 105 Octalink BB as a spare in my toolbox, so I cannot tell you if it is signifcantly better-or-worse than the Ultegra/DA bottom brackets, but my reckoning is that the difference is mostly cosmetic (and, cost).

I actually prefer the 112.5mm XTR Octalink because it means I can readily move between a double & a triple crankset (a discovery made through laziness) whereby I only need to adjust the front derailleur's inner stop (after switching cranks, that is). The XT & LX Octalinks have a different spline pattern, in case you were wondering.
Good point! I cannot really feel any difference between an Ultegra BB and a 105 BB, however, according to our buddy steelem, you will be able to go 20 MPH faster if you use a DA BB instead of a 105 BB .
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it!
Reply With Quote


  #6  
Old 10-14.-2007
artemidorus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,257
Rep Power: 21
artemidorus will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Replacing shimano 600 crankset with 105.

I only managed to get about 15,000km (in fact, it was catching a little at about 8,000km, not so you'd notice when riding) out of a 105 Octalink BB, a figure that looks poor in comparison with a cheaper square taper BB, and probably reflects the much smaller bearings that I imagine are able to fit with the fat axle. I'm not sure whether Ultegra is any better, but I'm in the process of finding out.
If you don't already own the BB/crankset, you should prefer a Hollowtech II set.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
105, 600, crankset, replacing, shimano

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM.
Languages translations made by vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish