Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Poll: Zipps or Carbones, Clincher or Tubular
Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.
Poll Options
Zipps or Carbones, Clincher or Tubular

Mavic Cosmic Carbones vs. Zipp 404s

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
celin721 will become famous soon enough
Default Mavic Cosmic Carbones vs. Zipp 404s

Hey,
I wanted to buy a pair of carbon wheels but I wasn't sure which I wanted. I want tubulars because they're lighter and have an awesome ride, ive heard, but they are hard to change if you get a flat or something. My other delima is that I don't know which wheels to get. Ive seen good deals on the carbones for about $1K and ive heard they are very strong and durable, but the zipps are 260g lighter, however only race day wheels and they warp if you hit a pothole. They are also 500-1000 dollars more. So my questions are:

Clinchers or Tubulars
Zipp 404s or Mavic Cosmic Carbones
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09.-2007
artemidorus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,257
Rep Power: 21
artemidorus will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Mavic Cosmic Carbones vs. Zipp 404s

When you say you want carbon wheels, do you mean that you want light wheels or aerodynamic wheels?
Cosmic Carbone SL are basically standard alloy rims with a carbon fairing, so you can ride them as any other wheel. They have a normal alloy braking surface. The downside is that they are relatively heavy. I am happy to commute on them.
With the 404s, you have a lighter wheel with a carbon braking surface. Whether or not they really are as failure-proof as an alloy wheel, I can't comment on, but I wouldn't feel safe on them and consequently would not use them.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 12-09.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
celin721 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Mavic Cosmic Carbones vs. Zipp 404s

Well both really. Basically a pair of race day wheels, aero and light.
Reply With Quote


  #4  
Old 01-15.-2008
puma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mountain View, CA
Age: 27
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 13
puma will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Mavic Cosmic Carbones vs. Zipp 404s

It depends on the type of person and rider you are. If you're wealthy, by all means, get the Zipps, they are better "racers." If you are a climbing featherweight and/or are counting every gram on both on your bike and body, and are willing to spend the extra dough to get to the base of a climb and then to the top faster, get the Zipps. But if you're not really any of those, then get the Mavics. IMO, the Mavics have a better chance surviving a crash or mishap, will last longer, and are way cheaper. Plus they're clinchers too, so less hassle for you (thought the Zipps come in this variety, too, but it slighlt defeats the purpose of the light-factor). The Zipps are lighter and faster and you pay for it.

Neither is likely to be the limiting factor in your success or failure and look mighty sweet.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
404s, carbones, cosmic, mavic, zipp

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.
Translations delivered by vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish