Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













weight - Page 2

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-12.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,827
Rep Power: 7
alfeng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by alienator
Wow. As usual, even with your deft use of colors, italics, and bold font, you read things that weren't even there.

First, perhaps you ought to read John's stuff more carefully.

Second, there has been no study that has shown any connection between frame or wheel stiffness that significantly or perceptibly improves performance. That is, in science, called a significant negative. Look it up.

Third: UofA? Uhm, its UA, and who the hell said I am in Engineering? You should get some remedial reading help.

Fourth: You quickly discount the results of one study that indicated that riders weren't able to reliably able to discern wheel stiffness quality. That study implied that riders had a probability of about 50% of "choosing" correctly. This suggests that riders couldn't with any accuracy ascribe performance benefits to a wheel, further suggesting that there may be no correlation (Uhm, correlation in the statistical sense. Again, look it up.) between wheel stiffness and performance gain/benefit.

Fifth: One point on a curve? Well, FYI, you can't fit a curve to one point. You can fit an infinite number of curves, but not one. Your math skills appear to be exceedingly weak. I did not draw a determination from "one point." You clearly don't understand the whole scientific method thing.

Sixth: Increased wheel stiffness has it's greatest effect entering corners under braking and exiting corners under power. It helps to maintain steering precision and confidence. Conversely, mid-corner increased wheel stiffness is not a bonus as the out of plane force inputs to the wheel are bumps, cracks, gravel and the like. A stiff wheel bounces off those defects, while a less stiff wheel flexes more in response to said inputs and better maintains its line. So, Professor, please tell me then which one is better and please justify your answer.

Alas, your presentation, as do all of your presentations, relies only on font trickery. Otherwise you've proven nothing, nor have you even shown that understand what you're talking about.
You're still spewing piss.

AND, your 'sixth' point reenforces my contention despite your belief to the contrary. Let some air out of your tires if you want better handling in the middle of a turn.

No offense to Swanson, but I looked at his presentation the 'first day' and the data was scant & therefore meaningless -- an unfortunate waste of time as originally presented -- and, YOU were the one who presumes conclusions can be extrapolated from minimum data ...

Are you even reading what you write?

Why don't you show your postings to whichever department you are in?

Oh, wait. If you did THAT, you'd probably be kicked out of school because no professional or graduate school would want someone whose posts are so immature and generally belligerent to be degreed by them.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-12.-2008
alienator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Age: 44
Posts: 4,125
Rep Power: 10
alienator is on a distinguished road
Default Re: weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by alienator
Wow. As usual, even with your deft use of colors, italics, and bold font, you read things that weren't even there.

First, perhaps you ought to read John's stuff more carefully.

Second, there has been no study that has shown any connection between frame or wheel stiffness that significantly or perceptibly improves performance. That is, in science, called a significant negative. Look it up.

Third: UofA? Uhm, its UA, and who the hell said I am in Engineering? You should get some remedial reading help.

Fourth: You quickly discount the results of one study that indicated that riders weren't able to reliably able to discern wheel stiffness quality. That study implied that riders had a probability of about 50% of "choosing" correctly. This suggests that riders couldn't with any accuracy ascribe performance benefits to a wheel, further suggesting that there may be no correlation (Uhm, correlation in the statistical sense. Again, look it up.) between wheel stiffness and performance gain/benefit.

Fifth: One point on a curve? Well, FYI, you can't fit a curve to one point. You can fit an infinite number of curves, but not one. Your math skills appear to be exceedingly weak. I did not draw a determination from "one point." You clearly don't understand the whole scientific method thing.

Sixth: Increased wheel stiffness has it's greatest effect entering corners under braking and exiting corners under power. It helps to maintain steering precision and confidence. Conversely, mid-corner increased wheel stiffness is not a bonus as the out of plane force inputs to the wheel are bumps, cracks, gravel and the like. A stiff wheel bounces off those defects, while a less stiff wheel flexes more in response to said inputs and better maintains its line. So, Professor, please tell me then which one is better and please justify your answer.

Alas, your presentation, as do all of your presentations, relies only on font trickery. Otherwise you've proven nothing, nor have you even shown that understand what you're talking about.
Wow. So educated. You really know how to turn a phrase. Rant on, fella. Italicize. Capitalize. Underline. Put it in a bold font, in a rainbow of colors. That's impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-12.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,827
Rep Power: 7
alfeng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by alienator
Wow. So educated. You really know how to turn a phrase. Rant on, fella. Italicize. Capitalize. Underline. Put it in a bold font, in a rainbow of colors. That's impressive.
You're still spewing piss!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-12.-2008
AngryPenguin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Age: 19
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 2
AngryPenguin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfeng
You're still spewing piss!
Yay i'm mature, I can slag other people off... get a room you two.

I'll second the weight thing, I think the difference is more psychological than weight related. If you feel quick then you do go a bit quicker.

In terms of stiffness go with what feels good for you, although we can't agree how much difference it makes I think feeling good about the wheels is more important than any energy lost.
__________________
Its not what you've got its what you do with it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-12.-2008
alienator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Age: 44
Posts: 4,125
Rep Power: 10
alienator is on a distinguished road
Default Re: weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPenguin
In terms of stiffness go with what feels good for you, although we can't agree how much difference it makes I think feeling good about the wheels is more important than any energy lost.
Exactly. A person should always go with what feels best or buffs their kettlebells.
__________________
Sex is horrid
Pain is Fun
I cut my fingers off
One by one
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-13.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,500
Rep Power: 12
531Aussie is on a distinguished road
Default Re: weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackchoo
which is faster?

a guy who weighs 80kg on 9kg road bike OR that same guy, who lost 3kg (to 77kg) on a 12kg road bike (ok assuming its the same bike and i stick 3kg of dead weight to the top tube?)
theory goes that losing 3kg of blubber will make a rider aerobically more efficient, coz they won't have to supply blood to the extra 'biomass', or somethink along them lines. Adipose tissue around the gut and **** doesn't demand a lot of blood during intense exercise, but apparently it's enough to make a difference. Google it

Also, I've read that "a every few extra inches" around the stomach makes a rider less aero. There was an equation I once saw which said that a 'certain' about of extra inches around the guts contributed to a 'certain' amount of drag
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
weight

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish