Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Custom made frame....necessary ? - Page 2

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-05.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 0
baker3 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Custom made frame....necessary ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by groskilly View Post
Thinking about another bike and a number of my cycling friends swear by their custom made frames. Clearly it is not absolutely necessary as the vast majority of riders are perfectly happy with their boxed bikes. Any thoughts on this from the forum ?
Nope, you just need to get fitted properly IMO, most shops offer this service.
__________________
baker
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-06.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,828
Rep Power: 7
alfeng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Custom made frame....necessary ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios View Post
Grey, chrome fork. I'll try to attach a picture. Email if you are really interested.

Peter@vecchios.com

Frame and fork only, not the VW either.
Peter, how different was the geometry you spec'd for the Waterford than the geometry of the Merckx frame ... and, how would you say the ride on your Waterford compares with the Merckx's ride?

I presume you moved the Ti seatpost to the Waterford, too ...

Other than the lower weight & obvious improvement in the aesthetics of the Ti seatpost, why did you abandon the C-Record post? I only ask because the Ti seatpost isn't consistent with the other components.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-07.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: People's Republic of Boulder
Posts: 1,596
Rep Power: 3
Peter@vecchios is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Custom made frame....necessary ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfeng View Post
Peter, how different was the geometry you spec'd for the Waterford than the geometry of the Merckx frame ... and, how would you say the ride on your Waterford compares with the Merckx's ride?

I presume you moved the Ti seatpost to the Waterford, too ...

Other than the lower weight & obvious improvement in the aesthetics of the Ti seatpost, why did you abandon the C-Record post? I only ask because the Ti seatpost isn't consistent with the other components.
Geometry in terms of seat and headtube angles, fork rake, top tube length, same for each. Waterford's chainstays about 1cm longer is all and the headtube 1cm longer. Aluminum seatpost on the Waterford.

I had the seatpost, didn't have a aero C-Record one. I actually prefer the round post, easier to into a work stand and be secure.

The ride of the Merckx is stiffer than the Waterford, no doubt about it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-07.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,828
Rep Power: 7
alfeng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Custom made frame....necessary ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios View Post
Geometry in terms of seat and headtube angles, fork rake, top tube length, same for each. Waterford's chainstays about 1cm longer is all and the headtube 1cm longer. Aluminum seatpost on the Waterford.

I had the seatpost, didn't have a aero C-Record one. I actually prefer the round post, easier to into a work stand and be secure.

The ride of the Merckx is stiffer than the Waterford, no doubt about it.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
custom, framenecessary

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish