|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Regards Michael Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain XTR triple. Road Dura Ace double. Used to ride a 105 triple road, but only got in the baby ring once...and that was just to test it out. Heck, unless it's a killer hill I rarely get in the small ring of a double! Not saying the triple is a waste and a useless marketing scam, but I personally don't see the point. Now if you like the trip for it's 42 second ring versus the 39 of the double that could be a consideration.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Me? i ride an ANCIENT stronglight tripple, because i inherited the bike i ride. However i intend to swap it for an ultegra double as soon as i manage to scrape the necessary cash... Currently running 9-speed drivetrain with a crank that ran a million miles on a 7-speed chain and drivetrain. Since it spent most time on the middle ring if i try to ride that ring now with my 9s the chain skips like hell as soon as u put a little pressure on it (this has cost me two falls and a 5-day injury on my right knee), so i'm limited to the bigger (53) ring, because i dont use the granny.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| double, people, riding, tripple |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:58 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com











Linear Mode
