Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Equipment
Cycling Equipment Need some advice on cycling equipment? Do you have a buckled wheel? Problems with your gears? Need help truing a wheel?













Trek 5900 or 5500

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central part of Greece
Age: 41
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0
bikemonk
Default Trek 5900 or 5500

I'm thinking about buying a Trek 5500 or a 5900, 2004 model. The 5900 is marketed as a "climbing bike". Can anyone please tell me what is the difference between the two, apart the lighter frame of the 5900 (110 OCLV instead of 120)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,151
Rep Power: 12
boudreaux is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Trek 5900 or 5500

Quote:
Originally posted by bikemonk
I'm thinking about buying a Trek 5500 or a 5900, 2004 model. The 5900 is marketed as a "climbing bike". Can anyone please tell me what is the difference between the two, apart the lighter frame of the 5900 (110 OCLV instead of 120)?
It's marketing. Geometry is the same. Read the specs. A few grams lighter in the frame and lighter more delicate wheels. Is a $900 in list price woth it? If you don't have the motor, all the light in the world is just a waste.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 7
bigfloppyllama
Default Re: Re: Trek 5900 or 5500

Quote:
Originally posted by boudreaux
It's marketing. Geometry is the same. Read the specs. A few grams lighter in the frame and lighter more delicate wheels. Is a $900 in list price woth it? If you don't have the motor, all the light in the world is just a waste.
The only differences are in the, fork, frame, wheels, seatpost, stem, saddle. The OCLV110 is about 6-7 ounces lighter for the frame than the OCLV120, and then maybe a few more ounces with all the rest.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18.-2003
dhk dhk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Huntsville, AL
Age: 62
Posts: 2,246
Rep Power: 9
dhk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Re: Trek 5900 or 5500

Quote:
Originally posted by boudreaux
It's marketing. Geometry is the same. Read the specs. A few grams lighter in the frame and lighter more delicate wheels. Is a $900 in list price woth it? If you don't have the motor, all the light in the world is just a waste.
Agree, but you've got to love the marketing departments push for the high-profit sales. In fact, seems to me the carbon-stay 2300 or 5200 or the best buys in the Trek line up now. I can't see how moving from Ultegra to DA is worth over $1000....

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08.-2003
BDD BDD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
BDD
Talking Re: Trek 5900 or 5500

Quote:
Originally posted by bikemonk
I'm thinking about buying a Trek 5500 or a 5900, 2004 model. The 5900 is marketed as a "climbing bike". Can anyone please tell me what is the difference between the two, apart the lighter frame of the 5900 (110 OCLV instead of 120)?


I recently purchased a 2004 Trek 5900 and I definetly do not have any regrets! The differences in the equipment and the weight savings is well worth the money. The bike is awesome! It is a rocket! I had an older 5200, it was a great bike, but this one blows it away. There is no comparison. Hopefully I responded in time. I hope this helps!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09.-2003
Madone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK nr York
Age: 48
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 7
Madone
Default

If your considering these two bikes then surely the Madone 5.9 comes into your price range, and is being marketed as Trek's top end all rounder, the bike which LA will reputedly ride more for stages in the 2004 Tour de France, lighter than the 5500 stiffer and more areodynamic than the 5900, just a thought
__________________
Lucky enuff to ride a Trek Madone5.9 10sp Dura-Ace Project One same result every ride .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09.-2003
meehs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Twin Cities area, Minnesota
Age: 44
Posts: 1,863
Rep Power: 8
meehs is on a distinguished road
Default

The most recent issue of "Bicycling" magazine included a review on the Trek Madone. The review said that Armstrong actually rode the Madone in the early stages of the 2003 Tour but switched back to his trusted 5900 for the later stages. Apparently Armstrong isn't 100% sold on the Madone.

The reviewer's opinion was that if you value speed over comfort the Madone might be for you but if you wanted a more comfortable ride, you ought to stick with the 5500 or 5900.
__________________
Rebellion with no point or purpose is worse than conformity.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09.-2003
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0
tspinner
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by meehs
The most recent issue of "Bicycling" magazine included a review on the Trek Madone. The review said that Armstrong actually rode the Madone in the early stages of the 2003 Tour but switched back to his trusted 5900 for the later stages. Apparently Armstrong isn't 100% sold on the Madone.

The reviewer's opinion was that if you value speed over comfort the Madone might be for you but if you wanted a more comfortable ride, you ought to stick with the 5500 or 5900.
OUCH!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09.-2003
Madone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK nr York
Age: 48
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 7
Madone
Default

I have read and sorry but cant find the link to the comments, that the Madone that will be in the shops and that LA rides next year has recieved some minor tweaks to the frame, to address that to stiff issue, he switched to the 5900 for the high peaks and rode 4 different types of frame if you inc. the TT bike.
__________________
Lucky enuff to ride a Trek Madone5.9 10sp Dura-Ace Project One same result every ride .
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
5500, 5900, trek

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish