Thanks for your responses. I'm not looking for a new bike. I just wanted to compare what others consider important when purchasing a bike. I know what elements I consider important, but not everyone is like me; and that's a good thing
I wanted to see what factors were most important and influenced your decisions. I don't know how many times I've met someone who purchased a bike because it "looked awesome", or it "was a cool brand", or "was a good deal", yet they didn't really shop around to realize that there are other awesome, cool brands that are just as good of a deal. And, not to mention, more fully serve their needs.
Look at it this way, most people don't study all the available options for a vehicle before purchasing one spec'd out exactly as they'd like. They just go to the dealer, look at the lot, and the first car that hits the spot is theirs.
But, when it comes to buying a bike, particularly over the $1000 mark, many cyclists start becoming nitpicky on options (i.e. components), until they get exactly what they want.
Why the difference between the two transactions?
Obviously, fit on a bike is perhaps one of the biggest requirements. But, any similarly sized frame can be fitted with a few tweeks. So, assuming fit can be tweaked between two different bikes, what are the other decision breakers?
I know that the difference for me is because I know how significant a couple specs can be in the overall riding experience. BUT, those specs that I consider important, aren't necessarily what others think. That's what I'm getting at, I wanted to get a feel for what others consider most important when shopping for a bike.
Sorry for the lengthy response, but hopefully this answers some of the previous inquiries and can produce some insightful responses.
Come to think of it, I could just post a poll and see how everyone votes. Would probably be easier for others to respond, too. hmmmm.........