| Cycling Training Post here if you need some help with training or have some training tips to share. Lots of training is something everyone who is into cycling has to do. |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
Originally posted by J-MAT KEEBLER: If you study the bodies of time-trial specialists, you will often find they have larger butts and thighs than "normal" road riders. This is extra muscle they have packed on from pushing big gears while seated. > Think there is a paper in this, I know some girls that could provide very reliable measures! Although I have never studied the bodies of TT specialists with any passion, I never noticed any difference in the worlds best TTers (boardman, indurain, armstrong, miller, etc) or pursuiters (McGee, Wiggins, etc.). Its also funny how the best TTers and pursuiters in the world also happen to be the best 'normal' road riders in the world! Is it because they happen to be gifted metabolicaly and not in the strength department? I don't recal any of these riders pushing big gears at lowish cadences! More muscle means more strength, which leads to increased power output. Power= work/time, or in the cyling world, pedal force/time. Stronger mucles produce more pedal force, and last longer before fatiguing. > What about track sprinters, arguably the strongest riders in the world yet fatigue the quickest! I've never seen a track sprinter in the tour perhaps they would fatigue (particularly on the climbs) and not last the distance! Also the power at the end of a 1km TT for a track sprinter is often less than 1/3 of the peak power produced at the start of the 1Km TT; thats a huge rate of fatigue!!! Put your bike in a 53x11 on the road and ride at 10 mph. That doesn't require much power at all, yet it will feel much harder that riding in a 39x21 at the same speed. The main difference between the two gears is pedal force. Stronger muscles generate higher pedal forces easier than weaker ones. > You need to be more specific! What do you mean by easier; less metabolic cost, smaller percentage of muscle recruited, etc?Actualy, stronger muscles can generate higher maximal forces than weaker muscles. During endurance cycling, riders never exert the maximal force on the pedals so increaseing the strength (maximal force) will not change ability to cycle in endurance events!!!
__________________ www.cyclingforums.com |
|
#17
| ||||
| ||||
|
#18
| |||
| |||
I'm actually referring to the set of zones that i developed, see: http://www.cyclingnews.com/fitness/?id=powerstern However, i assume that the zones from the BC(F) have been developed using the same physiological principles as mine, and as such should be similar enough to interchange them for some sessions (i.e., endurance based ones). I assume that physiological principles are the same or very similar as, when i was an undergrad, i was under the tutelage of the physiologist who developed the BCF zones (i.e., Peter Keen, and Louis Passfield). Ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
#19
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
|
#20
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ www.cyclingforums.com |
|
#21
| ||||
| ||||
I dont want to sound like an idiot here, but im gonna ask the question any way :-0> I have a watt meter om my tacx basic. Can i figure out my zones with this, by just increasing the watts at a regulr rate, or am i totally lost. Keebler
__________________ Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you are doing the impossible. |
|
#22
| ||||
| ||||
I'm not sure how reliable the meter is on your tacx. It doesn't really matter what values you get on the test Ric describes but what matters are that 100 watts = 100 watts every time you get on the bike. So yes you can complete the test on your tacx. Its not a good idea to compare values obtained from your tacx to PT or SRM measurments as the latter are likely to be more accurate.
__________________ www.cyclingforums.com |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Yes, it's quite possible to use the power zones i developed as described at the cyclingnews.com site above, with your tacx. There's two things to bear in mind though 1) as 2Lap points out, the tacx isn't a valid measure of power so you're unable to compare it to e.g., a PT or SRM. I've tried several tacxs and at a given power they've all come out with different estimates -- so, don't compare one to another unit either 2) as the braking unit on the tacx (and virtually all other turbo trainers) heats up (as your session progresses), the resistance in the flywheel alters. Thus, while the tacx (and other units) might display a constant power output (e.g., 250 W), the actual power will be dropping slightly. Or, to put it another way, while riding at a constant effort (under the guidance of e.g., PT) power and speed will increase on the tacx. It's been a long time (maybe 4 years now) since i last used a tacx, but from memory, on the unit i had i'm pretty sure it was 'loosing' 5% per hour. Ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
#24
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
|
#25
| ||||
| ||||
Using Ric's Zones your VO2 max will fall in Zone 6 (i.e. 100% of Max HR and 100% of MAP). You can do interval training as I think Ric described earlier. You could try: Warm up 3 x 4mins on and 8 mins off Warm down As you get fitter increase the reps or include an additional set rather than increasing the intensity or duration of the effort. The rest period is 8 minutes as this is designed to allow you to recover fully. Some riders need longer and some shorter. Just make sure that the quality of the efforts are maintained.
__________________ www.cyclingforums.com |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
Quote:
By the time you get into zones 5 and 6, you can do intervals of 3 to ~8-mins to increase VO2 max, starting with two or three reps (better aiming for a slightly low power and completing the session, as opposed to starting too hard, fatiguing rapidly and packing it in after 60-secs!). At zones 3 and 4, the duration will need to be longer, such that at zone 3 it might be a continuous effort of 30 - 90 mins, depending on your fitness level. It's also possible to combine these zones/intervals into a bigger session, e.g., WU, Zone 4, zone 5 and 6, CD Ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
#27
| ||||
| ||||
Hi Ric and 2lap, Thanxs for all the great help and info. Sorry if i seem like a little pain in the but, but i really want to put together a program that works. I have learned alot from this thread. Thanxs Keebler
__________________ Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you are doing the impossible. |
|
#28
| ||||
| ||||
|
#29
| |||
| |||
Quote:
also, a cold energy drink with electrolytes is critical. as is a freezing cold ice lolly afterwards. i can vouch for this Keebler, glad to help. did you get my email by the way? Ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
#30
| ||||
| ||||
Would it be smart to do the three sets and with each set go into a different zone i.e stay in zone 2 for most of the time for the 1st set go to zone 4 for 3 min. then recover then zone 5 for three minutes then recover and then zone 6 for three then cool down
__________________ Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you are doing the impossible. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| tacx, trainers |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.
vBET 3.2.2 gives automatic translations
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
vBET 3.2.2 gives automatic translations
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com













Linear Mode


















