Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Training
Cycling Training Post here if you need some help with training or have some training tips to share. Lots of training is something everyone who is into cycling has to do.













Strength and cycling controversy - Page 4

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #46  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,608
Rep Power: 7
Felt_Rider is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
At least with that gear you can lower the seat and let her ride it too....Be sure to get a gender neutral color.
Ouch
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 66
Posts: 4,116
Rep Power: 9
RapDaddyo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felt_Rider
I going the pansey route and getting a compact crank I may even be real wimpy and put a 12/27 on it.
My standard training drivetrain is a 34/50 crank and 13/29 cassette. I have no problem with someone calling me a wimp -- they just have to get to the top of the hill ahead of me.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 4,156
Rep Power: 9
frenchyge is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
At least with that gear you can lower the seat and let her ride it too....Be sure to get a gender neutral color.
Dang!

He said he left the door open, no need to use the battering ram.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Rep Power: 5
Billsworld is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

From a fellow gym rat to another. No harm no foul.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-24.-2006
fergie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 837
Rep Power: 6
fergie
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
My standard training drivetrain is a 34/50 crank and 13/29 cassette. I have no problem with someone calling me a wimp -- they just have to get to the top of the hill ahead of me.
Nothing wrong with those gears. I run a 50-34 and 12-27 and average between 65-80rpm on climbs. Funny thing is getting bogged down in the lower cadences I find it tough to generate as much power as I do when I spin at over 80rpm.

Hamish Ferguson
Cycling Coach
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 66
Posts: 4,116
Rep Power: 9
RapDaddyo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by fergie
Nothing wrong with those gears. I run a 50-34 and 12-27 and average between 65-80rpm on climbs. Funny thing is getting bogged down in the lower cadences I find it tough to generate as much power as I do when I spin at over 80rpm.
Exactly. But then, of course, I don't do gym work. If I did, I could probably push those "manly" gears.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,608
Rep Power: 7
Felt_Rider is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
From a fellow gym rat to another. No harm no foul.
It's all in good fun.

Besides I feel like I am in good company with confessions from good hill climbers using compact cranks and friendlier cassettes.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 5
postal_bag is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by velomanct
This topic has been beaten to death way too many times. Give it a rest.
True. It has me wondering, though, why bigger riders tend to put out more power. Is it just a matter of larger heart/lungs, etc. Sorry if this too has been covered, but I'm not keen on reading the entire thread, again.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-24.-2006
K50's Avatar
K50 K50 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 276
Rep Power: 5
K50 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by postal_bag
True. It has me wondering, though, why bigger riders tend to put out more power. Is it just a matter of larger heart/lungs, etc. Sorry if this too has been covered, but I'm not keen on reading the entire debate, again.
I think it's because they have to.

lol, simple as that, to me anyways.
The bigger you are, the more power you need to make. It's all about power/weight ratio. That's why skinny guys aren't huge, and huge guys have enormous legs. If they didn't have enormous, more powerful legs, they wouldn't be able to keep up with the skinny dudes. That being said, ideal climbers are around less than 2lbs/inch of body height. For a bigger guy to even try and compete with that, he's going to have to possess some dinosaur legs to keep up.

This sounds simple and like a good assumption to me, but who knows...
__________________
Kev
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-24.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Rep Power: 5
Billsworld is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
Exactly. But then, of course, I don't do gym work. If I did, I could probably push those "manly" gears.
Youd make me look like a sissy on any hill that took onger than 30 secs to climb. I bet Felty would be tough to challenge in the weight room.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-25.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,608
Rep Power: 7
Felt_Rider is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
I bet Felty would be tough to challenge in the weight room.
I'm afraid those days may be over for me.

I have had 5 minor muscle tears/strains in the past 5 years and this January I tore muscle fascia on my left quadricep that I am still trying to rehab.

I did light squats and leg presses this morning and had a neoprene compression wrap and a power wrap around the injury and it still felt like it was going to split open. Not from the weight but because I squat deep and it causes the skin and fascia to expand.

Fortunately I typically only do strength training during the fall and winter so it works well that I have until then to do volume work and rehab at the same time and then see what I can do next fall to build up the squat weight.

Dr. Morbius and I have traded PM's about the old hardcore lifting days at Coffee's Gym and it is tough to let those memories of the youth go.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-25.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 5
postal_bag is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by K50
I think it's because they have to.

lol, simple as that, to me anyways.
The bigger you are, the more power you need to make. It's all about power/weight ratio. That's why skinny guys aren't huge, and huge guys have enormous legs. If they didn't have enormous, more powerful legs, they wouldn't be able to keep up with the skinny dudes. That being said, ideal climbers are around less than 2lbs/inch of body height. For a bigger guy to even try and compete with that, he's going to have to possess some dinosaur legs to keep up.

This sounds simple and like a good assumption to me, but who knows...
But are they using their greater "strength" or their bigger engine to put out that much power?
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-25.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Rep Power: 5
Billsworld is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felt_Rider
I'm afraid those days may be over for me.

I have had 5 minor muscle tears/strains in the past 5 years and this January I tore muscle fascia on my left quadricep that I am still trying to rehab.

I did light squats and leg presses this morning and had a neoprene compression wrap and a power wrap around the injury and it still felt like it was going to split open. Not from the weight but because I squat deep and it causes the skin and fascia to expand.

Fortunately I typically only do strength training during the fall and winter so it works well that I have until then to do volume work and rehab at the same time and then see what I can do next fall to build up the squat weight.

Dr. Morbius and I have traded PM's about the old hardcore lifting days at Coffee's Gym and it is tough to let those memories of the youth go.
I am one of those fast twitch types with the skinny joints. My 10 year old daughter has the same size ankles as I do. By powerlifting I was able to put lots of tissue on a frame that wasnt meant for it. At 44 the glory days in the gym are gone and the joints say no mas. Masters track cycling seems alot more sensable than masters powerlifting at this point . That said, I have been doing my strength work on the bike of late. I have been combining the track style start with the seated stomp. I make an effort to stay in the same position that I sprint seated . so it helps sprinting specificly. I dont pull up hard on the pedals becuase I am not sure how much up force is able to be created in a high cadence sprint anyway (seems like mostly unweighting for me )and I want highest tension on the push . For power, the piece is over at 20 mph. I think about trying to snap the pedals off. If you want to go till failure ,add a hill that doesnt let you get over the gear. This is the longest I have ever gone without squatting. Feels odd........... I hope your leg heals soon
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-25.-2006
K50's Avatar
K50 K50 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 276
Rep Power: 5
K50 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by postal_bag
But are they using their greater "strength" or their bigger engine to put out that much power?
True. It may be both. Maybe their legs just look bigger because they are bigger hehe. But I'm sure there's still some extra muscle or power there that skinny guys don't get.
__________________
Kev
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-26.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
nickpbrown
Default Re: Strength and cycling controversy

What about this hypothetical situation.....

Take three people with the same aerobic fitness. One can only exert (as a maximum) the 25kg of force referred to in previous posts on this subject (so a particulalry weak person). If they were cycling and applying say 25kg I would be surprised if they could keep it going for very long (once). If somone else can exert a max of 40kg and were repeatedly applying the 25kg I suspect they would be able to apply this force for a longer period of time. And if someone else could exert a max of 80kg I'd expect them to be able to apply the 25kg force repeatedly for even longer. I think this is a fairly realistic although I obviously have no idea about the times involved. For example, if I went down the gym and bench pressed I'd be able to do very little - say 1 set of 10 reps @ 30kg. - that'll be it. Now if I trained at pressing for a month I'd be stronger, and if I could do 1 set of 10 @ 45kg I may be able to do 1 set of 15 @30kg. (no idea about accuracy, but just as an example). So by being stronger it's possible to do more reps at a given weight.
Now, I think that would be difficult to argue against.
However, & trying to get back on track so I don't get slaughtered,.... how does this apply across to cycling? There are clearly 'repetitional' benefits to be gained by increased strength, but these will depend on the forces involved. So using the same analogy: if I went to the gym and found I could BPress 1kg 100 times, but could only do 10 reps at 30kg, and I then worked out for a month and could now do 10reps @45 kg, would I still only be able to do 100@1kg or would I be able to do more? Or should we be looking at 1000@0.5kg? So for B Pressing repeatedly there is probably some point at which the forces are so small e.g. whether its 1kg or 10kg at which strength makes no difference but the determining factor is fitness / aerobic capacity etc., but inbetween that low weight and the maximum that can be lifted strength will have increasing importance.
So without just saying that it is a force that we can all apply, what is the force for cycling (applied by one leg to the pedal) above which strength does become important? are we talking; 1kg, 5kg, 10kg, 20kg, 30kg?

Incedently, in one of the magazines over here (oz) one of the aussie sprinters (road) says he does weights, sets of 30-40 or so I think he said. Sorry can't remember the name - was browsing while waiting for a train.

And please don't be rude to me, I'm just trying to understand all this.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
controversy, cycling, strength

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish