Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Cycling Training
Cycling Training Post here if you need some help with training or have some training tips to share. Lots of training is something everyone who is into cycling has to do.













crank arm length and compact rings

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
vscalia is on a distinguished road
Default crank arm length and compact rings

Hey,

My new team bikes are coming with compact crank sets on them. I am used to riding a standard but am interested in trying out the compact. an 11-25 cassete will have more of a range than a 12-15 with a standard crank. According to gear ratios charts. Heres the thing though. I am not a physicist. but if the chain rings are smalled than doesnt that change the amount of force made and thus change power output. I know that I will have more gears when climbing so thats fine. Also I am around 6'2" i ride a 172.5 crank arm length and have been reading about crank arm length recently. Most things I have seen say that it comes down to preference, and that there is no decisive studies to suggest anything. But do any of you out there have an opinon on what size cranks i should use. And what longer arms might or might not help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,997
Rep Power: 5
daveryanwyoming is on a distinguished road
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by vscalia
.... I am not a physicist. but if the chain rings are smalled than doesnt that change the amount of force made and thus change power output. ....
Well yes, but only in the same way that riding different gear ratios changes force/cadence requirements for a given power. Gear ratio is all that matters, the actual size of the chainring doesn't matter if you pair it up with the appropriate rear cog.

For example, a 53/15 gives you 89.4 gear inches on a road bike, a 50/15 gives you 90 gear inches on the same bike. Those two gear combinations are all but identical, it doesn't matter that you achieved the same gearing with a smaller front ring and different rear cog, the gearing ratio is all that matters in terms of force/cadence requirements for a given power output.

Hope that makes sense,
-Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
vscalia is on a distinguished road
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveryanwyoming
Well yes, but only in the same way that riding different gear ratios changes force/cadence requirements for a given power. Gear ratio is all that matters, the actual size of the chainring doesn't matter if you pair it up with the appropriate rear cog.

For example, a 53/15 gives you 89.4 gear inches on a road bike, a 50/15 gives you 90 gear inches on the same bike. Those two gear combinations are all but identical, it doesn't matter that you achieved the same gearing with a smaller front ring and different rear cog, the gearing ratio is all that matters in terms of force/cadence requirements for a given power output.

Hope that makes sense,
-Dave
definetly makes sense, thanks dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 284
Rep Power: 6
dkrenik
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by vscalia
Also I am around 6'2" i ride a 172.5 crank arm length and have been reading about crank arm length recently. Most things I have seen say that it comes down to preference, and that there is no decisive studies to suggest anything. But do any of you out there have an opinon on what size cranks i should use. And what longer arms might or might not help.
I would recommend keeping crankarm length a separate issue from compact/standard. CL is about fit and compact/standard is, well - gearing. You'll probably end up using about the same gear/inches (most of the time) on the compact cranks. If 172.5's have been working for you - stay with them.

Welcome to the compact world. I've a compact SRM and love it. I use an 11-25 cassette and have all the gears I need.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,080
Rep Power: 6
Alex Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveryanwyoming
For example, a 53/15 gives you 89.4 gear inches on a road bike, a 50/15 gives you 90 gear inches on the same bike. Those two gear combinations are all but identical...
Err, what my client meant to say was that a 53x16 (89.4") gear is almost equivalent to 50x15 (90") gear.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,997
Rep Power: 5
daveryanwyoming is on a distinguished road
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Simmons
Err, what my client meant to say was that a 53x16 (89.4") gear is almost equivalent to 50x15 (90") gear.
Ooops

Yeah, what he said... gotta write slower and think faster I guess.

-Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,080
Rep Power: 6
Alex Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveryanwyoming
Ooops

Yeah, what he said... gotta write slower and think faster I guess.

-Dave
I've been using speech recognition software over the last week or so. It is seriously dangerous with respect to thinking speed.

It's pretty cool to use though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04.-2008
swampy1970's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,145
Rep Power: 4
swampy1970 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: crank arm length and compact rings

Quote:
Originally Posted by vscalia
Hey,

My new team bikes are coming with compact crank sets on them. I am used to riding a standard but am interested in trying out the compact. an 11-25 cassete will have more of a range than a 12-15 with a standard crank. According to gear ratios charts. Heres the thing though. I am not a physicist. but if the chain rings are smalled than doesnt that change the amount of force made and thus change power output. I know that I will have more gears when climbing so thats fine. Also I am around 6'2" i ride a 172.5 crank arm length and have been reading about crank arm length recently. Most things I have seen say that it comes down to preference, and that there is no decisive studies to suggest anything. But do any of you out there have an opinon on what size cranks i should use. And what longer arms might or might not help.
If you're going uphill the longer cranks help. On the flat it's not as straight forward. If you're the type of dude that likes to do yoga then you might be able to deal with 180+mm cranks whilst riding on the drops with your back perfectly flat... most people can't though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
arm, compact, crank, length, rings

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish