at Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:47:24 GMT in <Xns96CABF075A7B1nospamdotcom@
216.196.97.136>, q (Andy) wrote :
>Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> On Wed 07 Sep 2005 02:39:13p, Andy wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, in effect, you stewed it, Andy. IMHO, the crockpot is not the
>>>> best method of achieving a "deli-style" roast beef. ...
>>>
>>> Wayne,
>>> Obviously not! I'll hunt for a "proper" roast beef recipe....
>>> Andy
>>>
>>
>> You might try this one, but use the oven for it...
....
>>
>> Preheat oven to 375 degrees F (190 degrees C). ... Roast in oven for 60
minutes (20 minutes per pound)....
>Wayne,
>
>I'll try that but ONLY 60 minutes?!? Where on the doneness scale will
>this finish?
>
60 minutes, yes. Oven roasting is a LOT faster cooking method than pot
roasting and the objectives are different. Pot roasting requires very long
times (and low temps) because the idea is to break down collagen fibres
(which make meat tough) and this must be done at a low temperature over a
long period of time, and with enough liquid. Oven roasting, meanwhile,
requires a high temperature and a short time because the idea is to
caramelise the outside of the meat while heating the middle. If you're used
to times for pot roasting, oven-roast times will probably seem ludicrously
short. 20 minutes/lb generally leans towards medium-rare. Many sources
recommend using a meat thermometer for better precision.
Cuts of beef suitable for oven roasting are different from those for pot
roasting, at least in general. However, I've found that the best economical
cut for oven roasting is one that also works excellently for pot roasting -
namely, chuck eye. However, chuck eye is pretty fatty, so it won't turn out
exactly like deli-style roast beef which usually uses one of the leaner
cuts - the round that you used being popular. Sirloin is another lean
roast, but it's pricier. Part of the reason delis like lean beef is that
it's *much* easier to slice thinly. Slicing a chuck-eye thinly takes
expertise, patience, and a very sharp knife. A chuck eye also won't slice
well in a deli slicer which pretty much nixes its use in actual delis. In
general, chuck cuts are better pot-roasted, and the chuck eye is no
exception - while as I say it makes a fine oven roast, it makes a
magnificent pot roast. Generally chuck roasts, particularly the 7-bone,
blade, and eye roasts, are best pot roasted. The very best oven roasts are
rib (occasionally seen in posh delis) and tenderloin (usually not used for
french dip although I suppose you could - but it'd be a waste). Top round
is popular and practical, although personally I think it rather devoid of
flavour and with a tendency to be rubbery even thinly sliced.
One cultural thing I notice - there's a group of people for whom the term
"roast" essentially means pot roast *automatically*. It's difficult for
them to conceive of or imagine doing a roast any other way and the idea of
a classic oven roast is more or less alien. You have to be careful when
scanning recipes as a result, because people in this group will, of course,
automatically submit pot-roast recipes, and just simply call them "roast"
or "roast beef" because it's the only way that they know. So it can be
confusing to the novice. Such people can also argue vehemently that
instructions for cooking meat for oven roasts are wrong, because when they
heard the term "roast" they automatically assumed pot roast and the
directions they then heard would be precisely those that would yield a very
poor pot roast indeed. So they think it's the recipe that's wrong rather
than their expectation of the result. I once got involved in a debate with
such a person who insisted that a tenderloin should be cooked at a low
temperature for a long time in plenty of liquid! This would be nearly a
crime on a tenderloin which essentially demands very high, dry temperatures
and short times.
--
Alex Rast
ad.rast.7@nwnotlink.NOSPAM.com
(remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply)