GM Diet program

http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/~jajoo/gmdiet.html

I just came across this diet program. What do you guys think?

thanks

Firstly, don't trust anything Indians or GM tell you. They're the two
most devious conglomerations on the planet.

Secondly, if you lose 10-17 pounds in a week without losing massive
amounts of muscle and water one of two things have happened:

(1) You have discovered the "miracle" diet or
(2) You just crapped all your internal organs over your couch as you
were stuffing yourself full of bananas and milk and watching reruns of
MacGyver

<raguraam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107895710.592153.140990@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/~jajoo/gmdiet.html
>
> I just came across this diet program. What do you guys think?
>
> thanks

The author forgot to mention that you are allowed unlimited ice-cream at all
times, because heating up the ice-cream uses more calories than you get from
eating it.

But otherwise it's excellent - especially 'if you have beer, drink only beer
that day'...

Peter

It's not a healthy way to diet. Take the word DIET out of our
Vocabulary and think Healthy Eating. The only way to lose weight is to
use small portions and a well balanced diet daily with adding 30-60
minutes a day of some kind of exercise. Walking coupled with a couple
of days of extra exercise like strength training or toning exercises.
My Dr. who is in his late fifties is slim and says eat Green leafy
vegatables with lean meats. Make sure you get fiber in there too.
When you follow a diet that you can't eat that way for the rest of your
life then it's not a good way to lose with.

"happycamper722" <hdefago@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107942020.770787.303280@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> It's not a healthy way to diet. Take the word DIET out of our
> Vocabulary and think Healthy Eating. The only way to lose weight is to
> use small portions and a well balanced diet daily with adding 30-60
> minutes a day of some kind of exercise. Walking coupled with a couple
> of days of extra exercise like strength training or toning exercises.
> My Dr. who is in his late fifties is slim and says eat Green leafy
> vegatables with lean meats. Make sure you get fiber in there too.
> When you follow a diet that you can't eat that way for the rest of your
> life then it's not a good way to lose with.

True, very true. The word "diet" implies a temporary change in eating
habits. What is necessary is to change those habits for the rest of your
life. Fruits and vegetables, a little whole grain, lean chicken and fish.
It's a two-step process: first, change the foods, then change the amount.

Cutting down the quantity of food is extremely important and very difficult
for most people, since we live in an environment of so much cheap, tasty,
heavily-promoted but bad food. Most of us are thinking, "How much can I eat
and still lose weight?" when a better question is, "How little can I eat and
stay healthy?"

Aerobic exercise keeps you heart-healthy and resistance exercise keeps you
strong. But restricting calories is #1. If you are eating so many calories
that you have to "burn off" some of them just to keep from getting fat, then
you need to eat fewer calories. The "burn it off" strategy doesn't work
very well, anyway. The calories you burn up in an hour of exercise you can
eat right back on in about a minute.

mack
austin

"happycamper722" <hdefago@hotmail.com> wrote
> It's not a healthy way to diet. Take the word DIET out of our
> Vocabulary and think Healthy Eating. The only way to lose weight is to
> use small portions and a well balanced diet daily with adding 30-60
> minutes a day of some kind of exercise.

The "only" way, huh? No other way of losing weight would work?

You ever hear the expression "ignorance is bliss"? Now we know why you are
'happycamper".

David

"happycamper722" <hdefago@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1107942020.770787.303280@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:

> It's not a healthy way to diet. Take the word DIET out of our
> Vocabulary and think Healthy Eating. The only way to lose weight is to
> use small portions and a well balanced diet daily with adding 30-60
> minutes a day of some kind of exercise. Walking coupled with a couple
> of days of extra exercise like strength training or toning exercises.
> My Dr. who is in his late fifties is slim and says eat Green leafy
> vegatables with lean meats. Make sure you get fiber in there too.
> When you follow a diet that you can't eat that way for the rest of your
> life then it's not a good way to lose with.
>
>

AMEN!

All diets fail when they end.
Only a *permanent* lifestyle change works.

"rick++" <rick303@hotmail.com> wrote
> All diets fail when they end.
> Only a *permanent* lifestyle change works.

I don't see "alt.soc.absolutes.morons" in the headers.

"All" diets fail when they end? So if I go on a ________ diet, and when I
reach my goal, switch back to maintenance calories, the diet fails?

If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20 pounds
of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way, it
won't "work"?

Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.

David

David Cohen wrote:

> Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.
>
> Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.

Hey! You better retract that or I'll have to kill you the next time I'm
there and feed you to your dogs (after I stuff you with carrots).
And I'll sick the black ninja horses on you.

elzinator wrote:
> David Cohen wrote:
>
> > Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.
> >
> > Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.
>
> Hey! You better retract that or I'll have to kill you the next time
I'm
> there and feed you to your dogs (after I stuff you with carrots).
> And I'll sick the black ninja horses on you.


Not...The Black Ninja Horses?!?! Nooooooo!!!!!!!

"elzinator" <elzinator@hotmail.com> wrote
> David Cohen wrote:
>
>> Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.
>>
>> Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.
>
> Hey! You better retract that or I'll have to kill you the next time I'm
> there and feed you to your dogs (after I stuff you with carrots).
> And I'll sick the black ninja horses on you.

Aw, gee, threats from an anonymous Hotmail poster.

<running away, screaming like a girl>

David

In article <1107984205.503214.12960@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
elzinator <elzinator@hotmail.com> wrote:
>David Cohen wrote:
>
>> Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.
>>
>> Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.
>
>Hey! You better retract that or I'll have to kill you the next time I'm
>there and feed you to your dogs (after I stuff you with carrots).
>And I'll sick the black ninja horses on you.

What part of "anonymous" don't you understand?

Seth
--
This is mfw, nobody wants to raise the quality of the
discourse. -- Lyle McDonald

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:29:22 GMT, David Cohen wrote:
>
>"elzinator" <elzinator@hotmail.com> wrote
>> David Cohen wrote:
>>
>>> Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.
>>>
>>> Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.
>>
>> Hey! You better retract that or I'll have to kill you the next time I'm
>> there and feed you to your dogs (after I stuff you with carrots).
>> And I'll sick the black ninja horses on you.
>
>Aw, gee, threats from an anonymous Hotmail poster.
>
><running away, screaming like a girl>

Yes, I could see you doing that......

------------------------------
Reality is an illusion created by an intelligence deficiency.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:27:30 +0000 (UTC), Seth Breidbart wrote:
>In article <1107984205.503214.12960@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>elzinator <elzinator@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>David Cohen wrote:
>>
>>> Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.
>>>
>>> Gee, I guess some absolutes are true.
>>
>>Hey! You better retract that or I'll have to kill you the next time I'm
>>there and feed you to your dogs (after I stuff you with carrots).
>>And I'll sick the black ninja horses on you.
>
>What part of "anonymous" don't you understand?

Hmmm...... the 'mouse' part?


------------------------------
Reality is an illusion created by an intelligence deficiency.