I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon

http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh

Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web site.
I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any good or
are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:40:14 -0500, "R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote:

>I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
>
>http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
>
>Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web site.
>I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any good or
>are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.
>

I think they're flankies.

HTH

Ellis

"R3070US" <me@home.com> writes:
> Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's
> web site. I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book
> actually any good or are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.

I've got three of his books, and they all fall into the "no nonsense
just do it" category. He tells you what to do and why, and they
invariably work for me, so I'd say they were "actually any good".

And the first time I read "shills for Lyle" I thought "he's new here,
isn't he?" ;-)

But you could probably find the info you want online if you do a lot
of digging. The books organize it all into one place and put it in a
usable framework.

In article <HrmdnbIEKqM21zjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@rogers.com>,
"R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote:

> I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
>
> Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web site.
> I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any good or
> are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.
>
>

It's a fun read and has some excellent advice.
It also presumes that the reader has SOME knowlege of general nutrition
and food makeup. ;-)

If you understand basic nutrition, do get it...

I'm not on Lyle's website FWIW...

Cheers!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-*****." -Jack Nicholson

In article <cfoaq1dg8ebicevs1c19dp13uv6uctds3h@4ax.com>,
Ellis <ellis@large.not> wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:40:14 -0500, "R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote:
>
> >I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
> >
> >Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web site.
> >I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any good or
> >are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.
> >
>
> I think they're flankies.
>
> HTH
>
> Ellis

<lol>
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-*****." -Jack Nicholson

"I think they're flankies."

Huh? is that a new word? I think they're flunkies.
....thehick

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <Omelet@brokenegz.com> wrote in message
news:Omelet-7497DB.07334418122005@corp.supernews.com...
> In article <HrmdnbIEKqM21zjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@rogers.com>,
> "R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote:
>
>> I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
>>
>> Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web
>> site.
>> I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any good
>> or
>> are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.
>>
>>
>
> It's a fun read and has some excellent advice.
> It also presumes that the reader has SOME knowlege of general nutrition
> and food makeup. ;-)
>
> If you understand basic nutrition, do get it...
>
> I'm not on Lyle's website FWIW...
>
> Cheers!
> --
> Om.
>
> "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-*****." -Jack
> Nicholson

OK. Thanks

On 18 Dec 2005 06:05:37 -0800, "thehick" <thehick@canada.com> wrote:

>Huh? is that a new word?

Not around these here parts.

Ellis

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:40:14 -0500, "R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote:

>I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
>
>http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
>
>Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web site.
>I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any good or
>are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.
>

That crappy book killed my brother in law.

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:20:58 +0000, Ellis <ellis@large.not> wrote:

>I think they're flankies.

That's "poofs" ol' chum.

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:33:44 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
<Omelet@brokenegz.com> wrote:

Hey fatherraper, are you still free? Or just out on bail?

Ellis said: "Not around these here parts. "
Hey! Thanks for the history lesson. A quick lookup and
i'm a little wiser.
....thehick

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:50:01 +0000, Ellis <ellis@large.not> wrote:

>>Huh? is that a new word?
>
>Not around these here parts.
>
>Ellis

But then, "sister-raper" isn't a new word in those parts either.

"R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote
>I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
>
> Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web
> site. I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any
> good or are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.

Both.

If you can actually follow simple directions, Lyle's version of the PSMF
work's great.

And, yes, the reviews were written by, as has been pointed out, his
flankies.

Buy the book. Don't try to obtain all the details on his forum. It's worth
it.

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....b00c1931cDavid

"R3070US" <me@home.com> wrote in message
news:HrmdnbIEKqM21zjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@rogers.com...
>I was just reading some reveiews of this book at Amazon
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8kqmh
>
> Many of the great reviews seem to be by people who frequent Lyle's web
> site. I recognize alot of the same user names. Is this book actually any
> good or are the reviewers just shill's for Lyle.
>
Shills for Lyle??

The only shills for Lyle would involve some kinda kinky sex with young asian
hotties.

Are you volunteering?