Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Mountain Bikes
Mountain Bikes Down Hill - Hard Tail - Mountain Bike Racing - Fat Tyers - Mountain Bike Riding or training - bring all your mountain bike chat here.













Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20.-2006
mpm's Avatar
mpm mpm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Santa Fe, Argentina
Age: 48
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0
mpm
Default Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

I'm thinking to change the rear derailleur of my bike (a Deore top normal)

Both, Shimano LX and XT, came in two versions, top normal and low normal, and I like to know which works better.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

Marcelo
__________________
1WD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26.-2006
mpm's Avatar
mpm mpm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Santa Fe, Argentina
Age: 48
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0
mpm
Default Re: Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpm
I'm thinking to change the rear derailleur of my bike (a Deore top normal)

Both, Shimano LX and XT, came in two versions, top normal and low normal, and I like to know which works better.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

Marcelo
I think I 'm not clear enough.

I like to know your opinions about the Shimano rapid rise (aka "low normal) vs the "traditionals" (top normal) rear derailleurs to help me to choose my new RD.

Thanks again.

Marcelo
__________________
1WD

Last edited by mpm; 10-26.-2006 at 02:17 PM.
Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 11-20.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Age: 35
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
Tanc is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpm
I like to know your opinions about the Shimano rapid rise (aka "low normal) vs the "traditionals" (top normal) rear derailleurs to help me to choose my new RD.
Hi Marcelo,

I'm not an expert and my experience is mostly with traditional top normal rear mechs, but recently I bought a Cannondale F800 with a low normal LX rear mech. I have to say I prefer the new low normal type rear mech, it seems to be more logical to push the same lever to move to 'faster' cogs whether with the left or right lever. What I mean is that your used to pushing the thumb lever for the front mech to go to a bigger cog to go faster, so it feels logical to press with the thumb for the rear mech to also go faster, although with a smaller cog.

The other reason it feels better is because its easier to change gear while pedaling up hill, the mech 'falls up' to a bigger cog.

It takes a bit of getting used to but I prefer the low normal type now. But like I said, I'm not an expert.
Reply With Quote


  #4  
Old 11-22.-2006
mpm's Avatar
mpm mpm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Santa Fe, Argentina
Age: 48
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0
mpm
Default Re: Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanc
Hi Marcelo ....
The other reason it feels better is because its easier to change gear while pedaling up hill, the mech 'falls up' to a bigger cog ....
Hi Tanc, thanks for your reply.

That is the kind of reply that I'm waiting for.

Best regards.

Marcelo
__________________
1WD
Reply With Quote


  #5  
Old 11-22.-2006
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,828
Rep Power: 20
alfeng is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanc
The other reason it feels better is because its easier to change gear while pedaling up hill, the mech 'falls up' to a bigger cog.
Yes. Downshifting to a larger cog is easier with a Rapid Rise rear derailleur.

It means that you don't have to dump-out onto your granny when you need a lower gear (presuming you still have a larger cog to shift onto in back).

FWIW. I was so disappointed with the inability of my Ultegra (6500) STI road shifters to downshift efficiently/smoothly when under load (that is, when already going uphill the chain seemed to balk at moving to a larger cog more-often-than-not) that I was within ONE WEEK of putting an old XTR Rapid Rise rear derailleur on my road bike ... the only thing that stopped me was ascertaining that the Campagnolo ERGO shifters that I was testing could downshift efficiently when under load.
Reply With Quote


  #6  
Old 12-31.-2006
johnnguyen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
johnnguyen
Default Re: Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

I've been riding off road for nine years and have been using rapid rise for four years now and it makes lots of sense to me. The learning curve is really short and the shifting is more precise then traditional. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote


  #7  
Old 02-11.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 7
bigpedaler is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Rear derailleur: Low normal or top normal ?

it's a matter of personal preference; that said, my experience is that rapid rise is more finicky to adjust, for some reason. i run the tried-and-true.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
derailleur, low, normal, rear

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.
Translations made by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish