Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Mountain Bikes
Mountain Bikes Down Hill - Hard Tail - Mountain Bike Racing - Fat Tyers - Mountain Bike Riding or training - bring all your mountain bike chat here.













Cassette Sizing?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02.-2003
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13
gwhunt23 will become famous soon enough
Default Cassette Sizing?

I am looking at buying a Shimano XT cassette for my '04 Trek 4300. I am doing the upgrade from 8 to 9 gears. So, I need to know what size to get. I know nothing about cassettes, so help would be greatly appreciated.

The sizes availabe are:

011/32
011/34
012/34

what do these numbers mean? wich will I need? I can provide more inforamtion if neccessary.

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03.-2003
cachehiker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 13
cachehiker will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Cassette Sizing?

Quote:
Originally posted by gwhunt23
I am looking at buying a Shimano XT cassette for my '04 Trek 4300. I am doing the upgrade from 8 to 9 gears. So, I need to know what size to get. I know nothing about cassettes, so help would be greatly appreciated.

The sizes availabe are:

011/32
011/34
012/34

what do these numbers mean? wich will I need? I can provide more inforamtion if neccessary.

Thanks in advance!
I hope your upgrading components now, buying a better frame/fork next winter, and then transferring them to the new frame and putting the old components back on the 4300 frame. It really doesn't justify a full XT setup.

The first number is the smallest cog and the second is the largest. I tend to spin and rarely push big gears for long so I use a 12-34. If you tend to pedal at a slower cadence, a 11-32 might work better for you.

I believe the cog sequence goes:
11-32: 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32
11-34: 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
12-34: 12-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
__________________
Bri
1,000,000 bicycles = 2 megacycles
Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 12-03.-2003
Hecubus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Rep Power: 14
Hecubus will become famous soon enough
Default

The 11-32 has overall smaller faster gears. If you want an easy cassette get the 11-34 or 12-34 which have a larger 34 cog for hard climbs. Decide whether you want the faster 11 cog at first or if you want a smaller jump between the first two small congs with the 12-34.
Reply With Quote


  #4  
Old 12-03.-2003
rek's Avatar
rek rek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 29
Posts: 1,200
Rep Power: 19
rek will become famous soon enough
Default

On a somewhat related note, you'll save a lot of money by going with a lower spec 9-speed cassette. You really don't lose much at all, except for a few grams of extra weight.

I run an LX-spec chain and cassette on my otherwise XT/XTR bike.. I see little value in dropping serious extra cash on consumables like chains and cassettes.
__________________
Peter
Cannondale Synapse Carbon Scalpel Cyclocross Ultra
Reply With Quote


  #5  
Old 12-03.-2003
Hecubus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Rep Power: 14
Hecubus will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by rek
On a somewhat related note, you'll save a lot of money by going with a lower spec 9-speed cassette. You really don't lose much at all, except for a few grams of extra weight.

I run an LX-spec chain and cassette on my otherwise XT/XTR bike.. I see little value in dropping serious extra cash on consumables like chains and cassettes.
I would say its the opposite. LX is not worth the cost. At least here the difference in price between XT and LX is so minimal its not worth considering LX unless your budget is seriously tight.
The difference in cost between an XTR chain and LX level chain is about 2 dollars so its not even worth considering anything less than the XTR chain. An XT cassette is $38 while and LX is about $30. There is not such a large drop in weight between XT and XTR when compared to the price difference but there is when comparing an LX cassette to an XT one. The XT uses an aluminum cog carrier which cuts weight considerably. LX doesn't use a carrier. They both have the same steel rings so they will wear down about equally as fast.
Reply With Quote


  #6  
Old 12-03.-2003
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13
gwhunt23 will become famous soon enough
Default

Thanks for your help! I think I will go with the 11-34, as I will need the large 34 cog for climbing hills, and will be ok with the larger jump between the 2 smallest cogs.

Thanks again!
Reply With Quote


  #7  
Old 12-03.-2003
rek's Avatar
rek rek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 29
Posts: 1,200
Rep Power: 19
rek will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hecubus
I would say its the opposite. LX is not worth the cost. At least here the difference in price between XT and LX is so minimal its not worth considering LX unless your budget is seriously tight.
The difference in cost between an XTR chain and LX level chain is about 2 dollars so its not even worth considering anything less than the XTR chain. An XT cassette is $38 while and LX is about $30.
I wish I lived where you are; here, XT cassettes are about 40-50% more expensive than LX, and you just don't want to know how much the XTR stuff is (chains or cassette)...
__________________
Peter
Cannondale Synapse Carbon Scalpel Cyclocross Ultra
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cassette, sizing

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.
Languages translations supported by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish