| Power Training This is the place to talk about training and racing with power (watts) measuring devices such as Polar 710/720, Power Tap, SRM or any other power measuring device. |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
After doing a search of these Forums it looks like there a few people training on the Cateye CS 1000 (which has a power reading ) and also PowerTap and SRM meters My question is, how well does the power reading from the CS 1000 correlate with the more accurate PowerTap and SRM values. Any advice or info would be greatly appreciated |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
I have the cateye and a powertap SL. According to the cateye I am world class! However my race results tell a different story. Here are some data points with the cateye on a resistance of 5% climb simulation with both wind and mag resistance: PT-SL Cateye 100 180 150 270 200 350 250 420 |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
) but for repeatability its not too bad - y'know like training to hold a steady power output irrespective of HR |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
I appreciate the data |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
|
#7
| |||
| |||
Quote:
If memory serves me correctly, i've used 5 Cateyes units and they all reported different values for the same PT or SRM power. Ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
|
#9
| |||
| |||
Quote:
ric
__________________ http://www.cyclecoach.com |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 1000, cateye, power, values |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com







) and also PowerTap and SRM meters

) but for repeatability its not too bad - y'know like training to hold a steady power output irrespective of HR 




Linear Mode

















