Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Power Training
Power Training This is the place to talk about training and racing with power (watts) measuring devices such as Polar 710/720, Power Tap, SRM or any other power measuring device.













Any reason to train at L2 or L3? - Page 3

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-23.-2007
Porkyboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northumberland. UK
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 4
Porkyboy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Rob

Quote:
Originally Posted by mullerrj
PB..my apologies..I have a habit of misunderstanding questions at time. Glad to see you got your question answered. Regards Rob
No problem at all, if anything I'm the worst offender when it comes to that

Cheers.

PB
__________________
What do you mean your legs are hurting? Give it some welly man!
Visit My Training Weblog
Follow Me On Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-23.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 5
sidewind is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Simmons
In the "Table 2 - Expected physiological/performance adaptations resulting from training at levels 1-7:" There are listed lot of adaptations, but none of them seem to be cycling specific, wouldn't eg training by running at similar intensities bring the same kind of adaptations into mitochondria, enzymes etc? But, has the adaptations which make cyclist a cyclist and runner a runner listed somewhere? Which training intensities are related with those adaptations?
__________________
These are layman's opinions, expressed in language no self-respecting scientist woul be using.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-23.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Rep Power: 8
Roadie_scum is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewind
In the "Table 2 - Expected physiological/performance adaptations resulting from training at levels 1-7:" There are listed lot of adaptations, but none of them seem to be cycling specific, wouldn't eg training by running at similar intensities bring the same kind of adaptations into mitochondria, enzymes etc? But, has the adaptations which make cyclist a cyclist and runner a runner listed somewhere? Which training intensities are related with those adaptations?
This probably isn't the whole answer... but I'll give it a shot. Maybe Ric, Andy or Alex can chime in and correct me or add to my thoughts.

1. In addition to the physiological things listed, there is a neuromuscular component to fatigue at all levels... not just sprinting. Neuromuscular improvements are seen only when training at specific joint angles and velocities. Thus the crossover between cycling and running is limited.

2. Running requires muscles adapt to very high eccentric forces (esp running downhill) and hence fatigue muscles more and reduce the specificity of the exercise.

3. Even when attempting steady state efforts, cycling is fairly stochastic in terms of energy demands (you go hard up little hills, etc). This may not be the case running (I don't really know), but would also influence the specificity and the level of crossover.

I actually like my neuromuscular theory... a lot of good middle distance runners I've seen crossover take a while to adapt to cycling (3-12 months), but then are very fit and fast. Or they are fit (they climb) but they are too sketchy in bunches to be bike racers.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-24.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,721
Rep Power: 9
acoggan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewind
In the "Table 2 - Expected physiological/performance adaptations resulting from training at levels 1-7:" There are listed lot of adaptations, but none of them seem to be cycling specific, wouldn't eg training by running at similar intensities bring the same kind of adaptations into mitochondria, enzymes etc? But, has the adaptations which make cyclist a cyclist and runner a runner listed somewhere? Which training intensities are related with those adaptations?
1. Training specificity is related to the mode of exercise, not the intensity.

2. Who cares about running/runners?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-24.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 244
Rep Power: 5
john979 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Back to the original topic. Both my FTP and VO2 max peaks are produced when my base consisted of a large volume of L3 training in the winter. Since I don't have multiple hours to train during the week, that rules out longer L2 rides. OTOH, when in the past I added in too much L4 training, my FTP peaked early and did not rise much thereafter.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-25.-2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,062
Rep Power: 7
rmur17 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by john979
Back to the original topic. Both my FTP and VO2 max peaks are produced when my base consisted of a large volume of L3 training in the winter. Since I don't have multiple hours to train during the week, that rules out longer L2 rides. OTOH, when in the past I added in too much L4 training, my FTP peaked early and did not rise much thereafter.
wrt. to the bolded comment, would you mind describing a typical week that worked well for you and one that did not (too much L4?). I'm interested in the volume of L4 in relation to total weekly volume and the intensity and format of the L4 workouts themselves.

If you use PMC, an idea of CTL at various phase is also of interest or a chart of course.
__________________
rmur
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
reason, train

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish