| Power Training This is the place to talk about training and racing with power (watts) measuring devices such as Polar 710/720, Power Tap, SRM or any other power measuring device. |
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I have about 9 weeks worth of base in my legs now. Have been doing 450-600 TSS since Thanksgiving, steady L3, L4, SST work. My Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday is indoors and usually goes 2x20 L4, 1x45 L3 and some weights followed by 2x20 SST, Saturday and Sunday are (weather permitting) outside in the L3 range usually getting in about 250-300 TSS points over the weekend. The FTP has risen steadily from a detrained 210 or so to about 250 new. Its my first year of training, and I plan to do about 20-25 races this year. The schedule starts in March. I had planned on doing my base/FTP work up until then, and possible though March, with the obvious exception of the early tune up races. Dont think I will be able to avoid L5/6 efforts in the early season crits. I don't really have any real A races, though there is a large race at the end of May that I would like to be ready for as Im sure the field will be stronger. I also will be upgrading to Cat 4 at some point in April, so while it would be nice to do well as a cat 5, any upgrade points can't be had until later in the season. Back to the point of the post, at what point should I switch gears and put in some higher level work? Thanks |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
Quote:
There's no one size fits all answer as to when to transition to higher end work or what your weekly training mix should look like when you make that transition. Nor how your training should evolve and change during the season. It depends on your goals, your previous training, the nature of the races you'll be entering, when you want to peak, if you're targeting multiple peaks, the results of your early season racing, how well you recover from high end work, your available training and recovery time, your overall lifestyle, your personal strengths and weaknesses, etc. Coaches earn their keep by developing training plans tailored to their clients specific needs and there's no simple answer to your questions. Here's some general guidelines:
Good luck, Dave |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Thanks in advance for your time. Scott |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
Quote:
No, I'm refering to VO2 Max as the "aerobic ceiling" or the limit of your aerobic performance. If your power for 20 minute or other long interval efforts or for that matter an accurate measure of your FTP starts closing in on your 5 minute power then you either haven't tried for high 5 minute power numbers or your FTP is a high percentage of your VO2 max power. IOW, you're closing in on your aerobic ceiling. If that's the case then raising that ceiling is the only way to see continued improvement. Of course it's just as likely that you've been focusing on longer efforts and haven't tested or tried to put out a big 5 minute effort recently. In which case a few dedicated L5 sessions will probably show a jump in 5 minute power when you make those efforts. FWIW I see periodic jumps in my 5 minute power even when I primarily focus on longer efforts in training. IOW, a "push up" approach to raising FTP also tends to raise 5 minute power. Not surprising if you buy into the Monod CP model for power and the contribution of both AWC and CP for power at different durations. Raise your CP(metabolic power) and your sustainable power for durations from 2 to 90 minutes or more should increase along with it. Anyway, whether you look at it as raising your aerobic ceiling or look at it as a power profile that's several rows lower in 5 minute than FTP some L5 work can help. Again it assumes the sustainable aerobic fitness(FTP) is high enough to at least hang with the pack. If not keep working on that. -Dave |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
Thanks Dave. A few more questions for you. I haven't focused at all on 5 minute efforts and a power test back on 12/14 showed that I produced 347W for 5 minutes and 292W for 20 minutes. Looking at my power profile, my highest peak at any time during the year tends to be in the 5 minute column. Based on what you said and my numbers above, would I benefit more, meaning would by FTP increase at a higher rate with the pull-up effect of L5 training? Is it better to have a lower % of FTP as part of V02 max as I assume is my case? At the end of the day, does a high 5 minute power equate to a higher FTP potential? |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
Quote:
![]() AFAIC the ratios are more interesting in an academic sense. Having the power you need to do well in your target events is the important part. The power profiles can help you identify your personal strengths and weaknesses as can a careful look at your race schedule with some understanding of how the different courses are likely to play out. The only time I'd care about FTP/5 minute power ratios is if the two seem to be converging implying that I'm approaching my current limits and need to raise the ceiling. I'm sure the ex-physiologists will have a better take on this, but I'm more concerned with what I can and can't do than how the ratios look on paper. -Dave |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
![]() What about thinking in terms of CTL too? Obviously there is no one-size-fits-all solution to minimum CTL but there's probably a minimum to be effective in racing and when you are reasonably "developed". I just don't know what that minimum is. Last edited by Steve_B; 01-24.-2008 at 09:21 PM. Reason: Addition |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Quote:
I suspect there are some minimums based on the nature of your races, but I know I've raced well in events that produced TSS values several times my CTL at the time. It took a while to recover from them, but long one day events are possible that greatly exceed your current CTL. Still I'd hate to enter a weekend or longer stage race with a CTL of 40 ![]() A point I picked up on last season is the idea that full tapers probably only apply to riders with CTL levels of 100 or more and folks in the 80 or lower range shouldn't spend too much in tapers. That's what got me on a track of mini-tapers last season where I'd only spend a bit of CTL for a bit of increased freshness largely because my CTL only broke the 100 mark for a short time last season. IOW, I didn't have much excess CTL headroom and wanted to preserve what I'd earned. I'm targeting 110 by late spring racing so my pre race strategies may change a bit this season. We'll see. -Dave |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Quote:
I really think for me there is very little difference in performance between CTL of 90 and of 100, other than at 100, I'm more likely to burn out later. I do acknowledge that there is something different about crossing the 90 threshold though and my body reacts differently. I'm generally riding pretty well by that point. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
#13
| |||
| |||
|
#14
| |||
| |||
Quote:
http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/power411/ |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| base |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









I do acknowledge that there is something different about crossing the 90 threshold though and my body reacts differently. I'm generally riding pretty well by that point.





Hybrid Mode

















