Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Power Training
Power Training This is the place to talk about training and racing with power (watts) measuring devices such as Polar 710/720, Power Tap, SRM or any other power measuring device.













I don't understand how/why it is harder to rack up TSS w/ higher FTP.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 0
simplyred is on a distinguished road
Default I don't understand how/why it is harder to rack up TSS w/ higher FTP.

I have a relatively low FTP [200W] - so high TSS rides come easy [I think the past 3 weeks I've averaged 1000 TSS]. The composition is boat loads of 4X20's @ 170/180W.

So - why is it harder for people with a higher FTP to reach the same TSS scores?

I mean if you have a 400W FTP - and you do 340/360W 4X20's - then shouldn't our TSS be the same? Because IF is just NP/FTP - no?

Maybe it's something I haven't picked up because I've never hit a 400W FTP. IOW, does 95% of FTP *feel* as difficult to maintain regardless of *how large* your FTP is? Or is it increasingly difficult to maintain 95% FTP as your FTP increases?
I suppose the metabolic demands are greater [larger magnitude of kJ required] - so it becomes harder to maintain such high TSS?

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by simplyred; 08-05.-2008 at 11:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05.-2008
Steve_B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 750
Rep Power: 3
Steve_B is on a distinguished road
Default Re: I don't understand how/why it is harder to rack up TSS w/ higher FTP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by simplyred
So - why is it harder for people with a higher FTP to reach the same TSS scores?
Well, for one thing, all that riding around you do to warm-up, cool down and as recovery between intervals is at a much higher % of your FTP than it probably would be for someone with a 400 W FTP. Therefore, you are racking up more TSS points during that "off time" than they are.

I doubt that it feels any different to someone with a higher FTP.

I also don't know that people with higher FTPs as a rule have a harder time accumulating TSS/CTL. I'm doing 700-1000 TSS weeks right now myself and my FTP is around 300 W. In fact, during the warmer months, I often have to make a conscious effort to do less than 600 TSS/week if I don't have something else going on.

I do know that it's hard for people to get the required time to it all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,085
Rep Power: 6
Alex Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default Re: I don't understand how/why it is harder to rack up TSS w/ higher FTP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by simplyred
I have a relatively low FTP [200W] - so high TSS rides come easy [I think the past 3 weeks I've averaged 1000 TSS]. The composition is boat loads of 4X20's @ 170/180W.

So - why is it harder for people with a higher FTP to reach the same TSS scores?

I mean if you have a 400W FTP - and you do 340/360W 4X20's - then shouldn't our TSS be the same? Because IF is just NP/FTP - no?

Maybe it's something I haven't picked up because I've never hit a 400W FTP. IOW, does 95% of FTP *feel* as difficult to maintain regardless of *how large* your FTP is? Or is it increasingly difficult to maintain 95% FTP as your FTP increases?
I suppose the metabolic demands are greater [larger magnitude of kJ required] - so it becomes harder to maintain such high TSS?

Thanks in advance.
It's also easier to rack up "TSS" when your FTP is underestimated. And when FTP is lowish, being just 10W low in your FTP estimate is a lot.

The vastly different kJ needs cannot be ignored either.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wagga Wagga, NSW
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 6
grahamspringett
Default Re: I don't understand how/why it is harder to rack up TSS w/ higher FTP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by simplyred
I have a relatively low FTP [200W] - so high TSS rides come easy [I think the past 3 weeks I've averaged 1000 TSS]. The composition is boat loads of 4X20's @ 170/180W.

So - why is it harder for people with a higher FTP to reach the same TSS scores?

I mean if you have a 400W FTP - and you do 340/360W 4X20's - then shouldn't our TSS be the same? Because IF is just NP/FTP - no?

Maybe it's something I haven't picked up because I've never hit a 400W FTP. IOW, does 95% of FTP *feel* as difficult to maintain regardless of *how large* your FTP is? Or is it increasingly difficult to maintain 95% FTP as your FTP increases?
I suppose the metabolic demands are greater [larger magnitude of kJ required] - so it becomes harder to maintain such high TSS?

Thanks in advance.
If you're doing 4x20s maybe you might think about retesting and upping your FTP. When I get to be able to do 4x20 I know it's time to move up the power table, and doing 'boatloads' of them sounds like you're doing it easy.

Get out there and suffer, and let us know if you've improved!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12.-2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,354
Rep Power: 7
Jono L is on a distinguished road
Default Re: I don't understand how/why it is harder to rack up TSS w/ higher FTP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Simmons

The vastly different kJ needs cannot be ignored either.
I think this is a big factor...quite a lot more total work for a 350FTP vs 190FTP
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ftp, harder, higher, how or why, rack, tss, understand, w or

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish