| Power Training This is the place to talk about training and racing with power (watts) measuring devices such as Polar 710/720, Power Tap, SRM or any other power measuring device. |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I have spent the last 6 weeks getting back into form, ready for winter training. After a period of almost 12 months without any training. Prior to that I was doing hard 5hr rides most weekends and 11-12hrs of structured training a week and my peak FTP was about 290w. I am not a racer. I didn't seed my CTL when I got back into training, I figured I was in pretty poor shape and started from zero. After a month got to a CTL of 45 and had been liberal with rest days. I started to up the intensity and keep an eye on my TSB, RHR and general fatigue. My goal being to get my FTP to around the 260 mark and work on getting my CV system restarted. I have found that a TSB of -50 or worse is about the time I need to take a rest of more than one day and that at -30 I should take it a bit easier taking perhaps a recovery ride or something. This has lead me to wonder -- how low is too low for TSB? As you become better trained can you do more work with less rest? What do you guys here think? How low have you taken your TSB? Did you get any adverse effects? |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
Hi Quote:
I think a very low TSB for a day say after a really big training effort at the end of a rapid CTL build before tapering for an event for example is Ok. That is as long as it doesn't push someone over the edge and I would think should be reserved for someone who is well trained and coming to the end of a CTL build before tapering to bring on a peak in form, which is not what you are doing I don't think. I wouldn't want a TSB is the -50s if I was returning to training, TBH I just wouldn't see the value in it but I guess it might work for some? I'm of course assuming that the numbers are all "correct", which may not be the case if there isn't a lot of recent training history going into the calculations. Cheers, PBUK
__________________ What do you mean your legs are hurting? Give it some welly man! Visit My Training Weblog Follow Me On Twitter |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
I don't know of any long-term adverse affects to low TSB. A certain TSB will feel a certain way depending upon CTL (and thus ATL as well) and the composition of what you have been doing up to that point. Obviously a certain training stimulus will result in a higher TSB if your CTL is higher. This makes sense - "the more you train, the more you can train". |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
I've just come off a -98 TSB though this wasn't intentional. I just didn't ride this year (~600 miles since Nov, 07 and prior to last week) due to a job promotion and then had to ride a 4 day/380 mile charity ride. After back to back centuries through the hills of southern Indiana, our 3rd day was a brutal 135 mile mostly flat day. The last day is only a 40 mile day, but was very "spirited". This is something I created six years ago to support a local charity and have been doing every year since. It kicked my butt badly since we didn't have any significantly weaker riders in the group and I ended up doing a great deal of pulling at 75% - 90% of estimated FTP for long periods of time, not to mention the hill sprints I occasionally participated in. Not really the example you were looking for, I know. For 3 days after the ride I woke up at 2:30am every night completely drenched from head to toe in sweat...not sure if related, but it definitely didn't feel "normal". I'm now fighting off a sinus infection a week later. Last edited by germanboxers; 09-27.-2008 at 01:13 PM. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
Quote:
As your body gets more accustomed to higher the training load (ie, CTL rises), it can absorb a few hard days much more easily and that's why TSB doesn't spike negative as readily. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
I would qualify that a -50 TSB after L2-L3 rides is not the same as a -50 TSB after L5-L6 training sessions. The former being somewhat tolerable, while the latter being close to unattainable. I thought I'd mention that before we're all tempted to start bragging about our "fatigue tolerance". |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
The issue I have is that with limited training any ultra event will occassion that type of TSB dip since we are talking about a ride of 600-800+ TSS ... |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
Quote:
a -50 with a CTL of 50 will likely feel less fatigued than a -50 with a CTL of 120 a -20 following 3 hours of SST will likely feel different than -20 following 10x 1min @L6 a -30 following a couple of short nights of sleep will feel different than -20 following a couple of nights of great sleep Consequently, as PMC indicators go, rather than solely monitoring TSB as a fatigue indicator, some advocate putting a bit more weight on CTL ramp rate (not exceeding a CTL ramp of more than 5-8 per week period).
__________________ Steve Palladino http://www.kp.org/mydoctor/steve_palladino http://eteamz.active.com/FightinBoba...=24&id=4591042 |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
|
#14
| |||
| |||
Quote:
If CTL is higher, then staying within a given (negative) TSB means that one can tolerate a much higher ATL. It should be intuitive that someone who hasn't been training at all is going to suffer more (and longer) from a 300 TSS ride than someone who's been training regularly for the last 6 months. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
So how low is it safe to go? 1) Should it be hard and fast, say no lower than -60? 2) Should it be a rule of thumb say, no more than CTL * -1 ? or CTL * -2 ? 3) Is it down to ability - say CTL*-1 for a relatively untrained rider moving to CTL * -2 for a cat 3 ... * -4 for cat 1 etc etc ? I guess we all work it out for ourselves by pushing our luck and getting a chest infection - kind of like seeing how fast you can corner at before crashing |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| low, tsb |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.
Languages translations supported by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Languages translations supported by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com













Linear Mode


















