This Forum is not dying

[Crankyfeet]

I'm just perplexed at TFF's squirrelmania fight analogy (though I was LOL). TFF - What the heck's going on in your shorts when you're off your bike??...

[Crankyfeet]

You just can't get these interesting conversations going when there are only guys in here. Talking about your squirrels, nuts, berries and twigs is just off limits for a stag discussion...

[C'dale Girl]

Originally Posted by Crankyfeet

You just can't get these interesting conversations going when there are only guys in here. Talking about your squirrels, nuts, berries and twigs is just off limits for a stag discussion...

Exactly. At least you realize the worth of the female presence here.

[jhuskey]

Originally Posted by Crankyfeet

I can understand that you might get that impression TDL if you interpret everything that is said as having literal meaning.

As I've said, I am not gay. I've slept with many gay men, and every time I try gay sex, I find I don't like it. Especially if he acts like a typical guy and doesn't call me afterwards...

Now some people will understand that the above paragraph is intended to be humorous (whether it has any humor or not is another question). I am fictitiously portraying myself as a practising homosexual (I am a sPOOF), that is not that fussed on it and in denial, for laughs. So TDL, don't take the literal meaning of that above paragraph OK.

I know what you mean. Build a bridge and do they call Cranky the bridge builder, NO!
Ride a bike down the street, but do they call you Cranky the cyclist, NO!
Commit one homosexual act and blah ,blah, blah ,labels and name calling.

[Crankyfeet]

Originally Posted by jhuskey

I know what you mean. Build a bridge and do they call Cranky the bridge builder, NO!
Ride a bike down the street, but do they call you Cranky the cyclist, NO!
Commit one homosexual act and blah ,blah, blah ,labels and name calling.

Exactly. I decided to quit and not be a homosexual years ago. But can people just let it go? No...

So what do people think of my cute new avatar and my video link of the cute six year old singer?...

[C'dale Girl]

Originally Posted by Crankyfeet

Exactly. I decided to quit and not be a homosexual years ago. But can people just let it go? No...

So what do people think of my cute new avatar and my video link of the cute six year old singer?...

Well, I'd love to smother your avatar in kisses and the send him/her home when s/he starts crying . . .

Somehow I missed the link. I'll have to look for it.

[Crankyfeet]

Originally Posted by C'dale Girl

Somehow I missed the link. I'll have to look for it.

It's here.

[thoughtforfood]

Originally Posted by Crankyfeet

I'm just perplexed at TFF's squirrelmania fight analogy (though I was LOL). TFF - What the heck's going on in your shorts when you're off your bike??...

It has a mind of its own....

[Crankyfeet]

Originally Posted by thoughtforfood

It has a mind of its own....

No wonder you have "RESTRAINT" tattooed backwards on your chest...

[TheDarkLord]

Hey Bro & Cranky, Alienator is at his statistics bull**** again in two different threads - the one about helmets and another about bike weight. It is amazing how he twists "lack of data" around to suit his needs. On the one hand, who cares that there is really no data to prove that helmets prevent a lot of head injuries among slow recreational riders (and there are several countries including here, where only a miniscule percentage of recreational riders wear helmets, and we are not exactly hearing stories about how x cyclists had head injuries). But when it comes to circumstantial evidence that a law making helmets mandatory in some Aussie city significantly reduced the number of cyclists, he goes off into how they didn't do any correlations, blah blah blah. And I saw that you responded to similar "lack of data" bull**** for the frame stiffness Cranky. This dude is nuts! End of rant.

[TheDarkLord]

Originally Posted by thoughtforfood

It has a mind of its own....

ROTFLMAO!

[Crankyfeet]

Originally Posted by TheDarkLord

Hey Bro & Cranky, Alienator is at his statistics bull**** again in two different threads - the one about helmets and another about bike weight. It is amazing how he twists "lack of data" around to suit his needs. On the one hand, who cares that there is really no data to prove that helmets prevent a lot of head injuries among slow recreational riders (and there are several countries including here, where only a miniscule percentage of recreational riders wear helmets, and we are not exactly hearing stories about how x cyclists had head injuries). But when it comes to circumstantial evidence that a law making helmets mandatory in some Aussie city significantly reduced the number of cyclists, he goes off into how they didn't do any correlations, blah blah blah. And I saw that you responded to similar "lack of data" bull**** for the frame stiffness Cranky. This dude is nuts! End of rant.

Welll I called him on that a few minutes ago. His MO is to question anyone's opinion that doesn't agree with his own as having no scientific data to back it up. This is my post:

So how do you support your antithesis that stiffness is a complete non-factor... if you are basing your opinion on no data obtained from any studies, experiments or calculations?

[TheDarkLord]

Originally Posted by Crankyfeet

Welll I called him on that a few minutes ago. His MO is to question anyone's opinion that doesn't agree with his own as having no scientific data to back it up. This is my post:

So how do you support your antithesis that stiffness is a complete non-factor... if you are basing your opinion on no data obtained from any studies, experiments or calculations?

And I acknowledged your post in my post. Don't pay much attention when you read, eh?

[C'dale Girl]

Originally Posted by thoughtforfood

It has a mind of its own....

Don't they all.

[C'dale Girl]

Originally Posted by Crankyfeet

It's here.

Tried to watch it once and got interrupted by two different people. Will have to watch it later this evening as I must jet now. Sorry Crankster.