| Professional Cycling This is the place to bring all your Giro, Vuelta a España and Tour de France chat. If you follow the the Classics and other professional bike races post here. |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
1) Reduce the number of teams in the peloton from 20 to 10. If I could run cycling, the following teams would NOT be invited back to the Tour next year: Silence-Lotto (Cadel can find somewhere else to ride, this team sucks) Agritubel Bouygues Telecom Cofidis Milram Francaise Des Jeux Lampre (Cuegno can find somewhere else to ride) Quick-step (Boonen can find another team as well) Credit Agricole (Thor do the same) What is left of Barloworld What is left of Saunier-Duval Why wouldn't I invite them back? Hmm...Because they don't win ANYTHING? With a smaller peloton you can know the bunch better. You can see the GC contenders more. You can see the battles between the teams more. You can get to know each team personally. You can see what you REALLY want to see, not endless waves of pedaling rubes that don't win crap...stage after stage. Here is who I would invite to be in my peloton next year: CSC-Saxobank Ag2r Gerolsteiner Liquigas Astana Casse d'Epargne Garmin-Chipotle Columbia Rabobank Euskaltel-Euskadi You cannot tell me that the aforementioned group would not be better than the group this year. You people actually like watching the hacks on Agritubel, Barloworld, etc. take up camera space? 2) Every Tour from now on must have a TTT and a MTT in exchange for two of those pointless flat stages. There needs to be more variety in the Tour, UNLESS some GC contender actually makes serious moves on the flat stages. Imagine if (God forbid) out of nowhere one day Cadel just rips the cranks of the bike and attacks like hell on a flat stage and sends everyone on a mad dash after him or lose major time in the GC. Too many of these flat stages just have the ultra-conservative peloton dopily trodding along to finish within 5 seconds of each other. 3) Every rider is tested after every stage. If you want to get rid of doping, this is one of the only ways to do it. I don't care how much money or time it takes. Get it done. The current setup where they test every once and a while...NO. This horrible system allows doped riders like Contador, Rasmussen, A.Schleck, and others to ride more often than what they should be allowed. With testing everyday, the **** stops. The more samples they can take, the more chances they have to bust the idiots. Common sense. 4) Versus should build up the KoM, Green, and White jersey competitions more than they do right now. It's not all about the Yellow Jersey. The average joe is watching a stage of the Tour de France. A few leadout riders are heavily attacking through a center of a town. They pass a white line, Liggett rambles a little bit, and some standings are briefly flashed on the screen. What the hell just happened? Versus does a horrible job building up the other 3 jerseys. They don't talk about points much. They don't talk about the areas where you can get these points. They don't talk about the contenders for these jerseys. Unless you are a hardcore fan who knows the maps of each stage, you don't have a clue when the point locations for these jerseys are coming up. For the record, I have Cycle Sport, VN, and other Tour guides always opened to the day of the stage on my coffee table with all the maps and stuff, but I'm talking about the average joe fan. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
No. Triple the amount of teams and reduce the size of each team to 6. This increases the size of the bunch but reduces the ability for teams to chase all day long. Take this bigger bunch through every small street you they can find so that there are lots of crashes. A third of the race should be on cobbles and in foul weather. That would be fun. You can also run the race as a miss and out. The team with the two lowest placed riders at the end of each stage looses its highest placed rider.
__________________ |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Or they could line the final climb with an 8 foot high wall, and release a ravenous pack of wolves after the riders go by, maybe have to release in stages with each pack that comes through, and if you are alone, you are assigned maybe 2 or 3 ravenous wolves...I am still vetting the idea so stick with the thread as I evlove it. Maybe they could require those frame pumps again as the only allowable method of changing a flat. You could also use the pump in any manner you choose, like the Cinzano guys in Breaking Away, but then you would be screwed if you flatted. Or you could allow fans to use super soakers on the riders I think that it would also be cool to have a TTT where only one guy was allowed to pull the entire route. Those are just some of the things I think would make the tour more interesting, but I haven't really put my dementia to task, so I will post some other ideas on down the line.
__________________ Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. -- Albert Einstein |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
Quote:
I think having time bonuses on mountain top finishes only , would force the contenders to attack towards the end of these stages, instead of just worrying about following the other contenders. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
#8
| |||
| |||
The funny thing with most of the people saying the tour was boring etc. What do they really want? On one hand they crucify the robotic dopers and on the other they criticise riders for no longer being the said robots who can attack endlessly all tour. The course was changed this year with no prologue, less sprint stages (& most of those were spread out), more stages to suit breakaways, good mountain stages, less TT miles & no time bonus's. Oh yeah, more than likely less dopers. Which is what everybody wants isn't it? but then you have to expect the racing to be different. Riders will get tired, perhaps they can't attack like you'd want them to because they can't and if they do, they're knackered the next day. Questions. At what time through this years tour could you pick the end results? (and I mean, the event was as good as won, barring mishap) How often could you pick the stage winner, on crucial stages? When was the last time the tour had the top 10 covered by 9mins? (certainly not in the last 14yrs I checked at least) I think most people are stuck in the Armstrong era, robots on bikes, attacks that stuck, riders not getting tired and strangely enough you virtually knew the end result of the tour by stage 4 or 5. (so how is that exciting?) The racing was Armstrong v's Ullrich or Armstrong v's Beloki. Their was barely 2 riders within 9mins of Armstrong most of the time. Below is a list on the amount of riders who were within 9mins of the winners time. 2008 - 9 riders 2007 - 4 riders 2006 - 6 riders 2005 - 2 riders 2004 - 3 riders 2003 - 4 riders 2002 - 2 riders 2001 - 1 rider 2000 - 1 rider 1999 - 1 rider 1998 - 2 riders 1997 - 1 rider 1996 - 4 riders 1995 - 3 riders In my opinion this year was clearly the best Tour de France I have watched. It was a race all the way to Paris, not to stage 4 or 5 TT or TT. I love the TTT but it doesn't bode well in the tour for the GC race, it's a great spectacle though. To make it better, as someone mentioned perhaps add another team or 2 and reduce the team member numbers. Instead 9 make it 6 and get rid of the radios make the riders think a little more on the road rather than wait for team car instructions over the radio. Only radio allowed for riders is an official course radio. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
With the boring sprint stages they could do 40km sprint stages in the morning followed by a 80km to 140km mountain stage an hour later. (or after lunch....no feed stops). 2 stages in one day.
__________________ Find your ideal riding partner. Anywhere in the world!!! |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
Quote:
They tried to reintroduce them in the Giro and the riders forced a backtrack.
__________________ And saying so to some Means nothing; others it leaves Nothing to be said. |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Cycle-wrestling with bulls!! |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
Nah, we make it like this. Saturday - Prologue to open the tour. Sunday - Stage 1 is a sprinters stage Monday - Stage 2 is a sprinters stage Tuesday - Stage 3 is a sprinters stage Wednesday - Stage 4 is a sprinters stage Thursday - Stage 5 - is a 53km time trial Friday - Stage 6 is a sprinters stage Saturday - Stage 7 is a medium mountain stage Sunday - Stage 8 is the first Pyrenees stage Monday - Stage 9 is the second Pyrenees stage Tuesday - Rest Day Wednesday - Stage 10 is the third Pyrenees stage Thursday - Stage 11 is a TTT Friday - Stage 12 is a transitional stage Saturday - Stage 13 is a transitional stage Sunday - Stage 14 is a flat stage Monday - Rest Day Tuesday - Stage 15 - the first Alp Stage Wednesday - Stage 16 - the second Alp Stage Thursday - Stage 17 - the third Alp stage Friday - Stage 18 - medium mountain stage Saturday - Stage 19 - Uphill Time Trial Sunday - Stage 20 - Paris The last week including an uphill Time trial is very tough on the main GC contenders. The first week includes a Prologue and a 46km time trial to open up the GC standings. The end of the first week touching the second week hits the Pyrenees with a team time trial a few days later. The last week is gruelling. That will make a more interesting tour. None of this 2 stages for a rest between the last huge Alp stage and a time trial. Make the time trial come straight away - uphill. Then they can relax to Paris. |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
The caravan should give tomatoes and rotten eggs to the crowd along the road and then McQuaid and Verdruggen should be in a UCI cabriolet paid with their bribes at the end of the caravan.
__________________ 6 +2 (according Ashenden) samples with EPO should have banned Lance Armstrong to start next TDF ! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| exciting, make, tour, ways |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.
Multilingual community supported by vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Multilingual community supported by vBET Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com













Linear Mode


















