Quote:
|
Originally Posted by limerickman I do buy Cycling Weekly from time to time and I do agree that it does take a more stringent line against doping than Cycle Sport (who's 1998 editorial stated that "we have taken an editorial decision to never feature the name or photograph of any riders found to have doped") and Procycling.
Credit where it is due the comic does argue for more stringent punishment for those caught doping. |
Cycling Weekly is very hypocritical though. Some riders like Millar and Ricco get absolutely slammed week after week, yet they run pages and pages of Astana features. The other week there was an editorial complaining about Columbia changing to a yellow kit, because apparently that reminded everyone too much of Ricardo Ricco at Saunier Duval, I mean come on.
They very carefully follow the traditional line that everyone is squeaky clean, until they get officially get caught, and then the rider is the devil incarnate and must have been acting alone without any team assistance.
I flick through it every week at the club, and if my name is in there then I go and buy a copy. At least I know I'm not doping and haven't taken any money to throw a race or anything. I got a whole sentence last week