Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Professional Cycling
Professional Cycling This is the place to bring all your Giro, Vuelta a España and Tour de France chat. If you follow the the Classics and other professional bike races post here.













Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-15.-2009
No_Positives's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 243
Rep Power: 5
No_Positives will become famous soon enough
Default Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

I find it interesting that from 1999-2005, the Tour de France had only a couple minor doping issues, and so far this year nothing to speak of. (Which sucks, as a positive test seems to make it more interesting). But look at the three years LA was out, and all doping hell broke loose.

Why is this? Most smart people know that Lance has always ridden clean, so maybe his presence influences the other riders to stay clean??
__________________
Lance Armstrong’s Last Words, August 10, 2007 - “We're proud of our record. We won eight Tours, a Vuelta, a Giro and other races and not one positive test," Armstrong said. “I’m not sure if there are many other teams who can say that right now. Couple that with our ethical record, despite all the gossip and nonsense that goes on.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-15.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 752
Rep Power: 14
Mansmind will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

That's an interesting question.. one I alluded to in a post earlier this week. It's almost like the issues started as if a switch had been flipped, then have mysteriously gone away.

I think one of the answers you'll hear is that supposedly LA had Ferrari tied up in an exclusive contract for much of that time.... hence he wasn't available to others. While he may very well have been tied up in contract, I don't think it had a large effect on other people doping...they want it they'll get it somewhere.


I disagree with you on one point. I don't think most "smart" people know that Lance rides/rode clean. I think most "smart" people look and the body of evidence and conclude that while he may not have been officially sanctioned, there is very good reason to believe or at least highly suspect that he did dope.
Reply With Quote


  #3  
Old 07-15.-2009
TheDarkLord's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,894
Rep Power: 19
TheDarkLord will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansmind View Post
I disagree with you on one point. I don't think most "smart" people know that Lance rides/rode clean. I think most "smart" people look and the body of evidence and conclude that while he may not have been officially sanctioned, there is very good reason to believe or at least highly suspect that he did dope.
A piece of advice: NP is trolling in this subject matter - just ignore.
Reply With Quote


  #4  
Old 07-15.-2009
poulidor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,423
Rep Power: 12
poulidor will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

By the past Lance rode with Pantani, Virenque, Riis, the festina boys, the Puerto boys, Ullrich, Basso, Landis, Herras, Hamilton, .... all those guys were so clean...with their doping that UCI was not worried until extern entities came!
__________________
6 +2 (according Ashenden) samples with EPO should have banned Lance Armstrong to start next TDF !
Reply With Quote


  #5  
Old 07-15.-2009
meehs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Twin Cities area, Minnesota
Age: 44
Posts: 1,863
Rep Power: 20
meehs will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Positives View Post
Most smart people know that Lance has always ridden clean...
Tee hee! Replace smart with naive and it would be more accurate.
__________________
Rebellion with no point or purpose is worse than conformity.
Reply With Quote


  #6  
Old 07-15.-2009
slovakguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 645
Rep Power: 10
slovakguy will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Positives View Post
Most smart people know that Lance has always ridden clean, so maybe his presence influences the other riders to stay clean??
so in real life, you're like a crazy person, right?
__________________
"Kick over the statues and the tyrants die. Wave bye bye to their heroes with a hammer."
--The Redskins, Kick Over the Statues
Reply With Quote


  #7  
Old 07-15.-2009
lwedge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
Posts: 1,543
Rep Power: 18
lwedge will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Positives View Post
Why is this? Most smart people know that Lance has always ridden clean, so maybe his presence influences the other riders to stay clean??
Classic.
Attached Thumbnails
Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?-troll-poop1-jpg  
__________________
If your traveling to the LakeTahoe, Apple Hill, Folsom area ? Then check out Charles Lee's site for some great information on rides, maps and events in this Northern California area. .
http://www.beautifulvista.com
Great wine !
http://www.chevalierwinery.com/
Reply With Quote


  #8  
Old 07-15.-2009
jhuskey's Avatar
Community Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 41
jhuskey has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

My wife influences me to stay clean. She says" you smell like s**t, go take a shower". I can hear Lance saying these words to the boys in the peloton. Truly inspirational!
__________________
Dope,when training and talent just aren't enough.
Reply With Quote


  #9  
Old 07-15.-2009
No_Positives's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 243
Rep Power: 5
No_Positives will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

You guys are the trolls. On every thread it's "Armstrong doped" "Armstrong doped." Even though he has never tested positive, it's "Armstrong doped." At least my comments are based on hundreds of negative tests. Yours are circumstantial.

Trolls=BadDeal, TheDumbLord, TonyCrackery, Putter, Poopidor, peehs, Slovakgirl, Lamerickman
__________________
Lance Armstrong’s Last Words, August 10, 2007 - “We're proud of our record. We won eight Tours, a Vuelta, a Giro and other races and not one positive test," Armstrong said. “I’m not sure if there are many other teams who can say that right now. Couple that with our ethical record, despite all the gossip and nonsense that goes on.”
Reply With Quote


  #10  
Old 07-15.-2009
limerickman's Avatar
Community Team
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 13,741
Rep Power: 67
limerickman is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lwedge View Post
Classic.



very good.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it" - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote


  #11  
Old 07-15.-2009
poulidor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,423
Rep Power: 12
poulidor will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Positives View Post
You guys are the trolls. On every thread it's "Armstrong doped" "Armstrong doped." Even though he has never tested positive, it's "Armstrong doped." At least my comments are based on hundreds of negative tests. Yours are circumstantial.
Are you speaking of hundreds negative tests passed by Marion Jones, Chambers, Kohl, Schumacher,...
__________________
6 +2 (according Ashenden) samples with EPO should have banned Lance Armstrong to start next TDF !
Reply With Quote


  #12  
Old 07-15.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 5
jimmypop will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

NP, even your quote's a lie. Discounting the testing of the '99 samples, Armstrong has had teammates test positive nearly as soon as they left the comforting wings of the Armstrong money machine.

Also, there's that cortisone non-negative that a cool $500K helped to disappear.

But you're not here to discuss or to even think, you're here to put out the fire with gasoline.
Reply With Quote


  #13  
Old 07-15.-2009
slovakguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 645
Rep Power: 10
slovakguy will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

at least no positives respects j huskey. didn't see fit to include him in the list. then again, he always was teacher's pet.
__________________
"Kick over the statues and the tyrants die. Wave bye bye to their heroes with a hammer."
--The Redskins, Kick Over the Statues
Reply With Quote


  #14  
Old 07-16.-2009
jhuskey's Avatar
Community Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 41
jhuskey has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

"he always was teacher's pet".

This one has me confused.
__________________
Dope,when training and talent just aren't enough.
Reply With Quote


  #15  
Old 07-16.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 13
leerobbs will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Very few doping positives during the Armstrong years. How come?

"I think one of the answers you'll hear is that supposedly LA had Ferrari tied up in an exclusive contract for much of that time.... "

I really don't think LA had an exlusive contract with a doping doctor. That concept is so lame. If he broke the contract what would happen? Would LA take him to court for violating his exclusive dopping contract? This is another one of those mindless rumors started by some loser. If Ferrari was helping him dope and he very well could have, he was not just helping LA.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
armstrong, doping, positives, years

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 PM.
Languages translations delivered by vBET 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish