Go Back   Cycling Forums » Other Stuff » Other Groups » rec.bicycles.misc » rec.bicycles.misc archive
rec.bicycles.misc archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.misc usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section!













Trek 520

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18.-2003
Cub Fan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Trek 520

Does anyone have an opinion about the Trek 520. I would use it for short (15 to 20 mile) trips and
some touring -- on roads and on bicycle paths (crushed gravel).

Would the Trek 520 be right for this purpose

Cub Fan
  #2  
Old 02-18.-2003
Mike Jacoubowsk
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trek 520

The TREK 520 would be just fine for such purposes, as would some cyclocross bikes (such as the TREK
X01). For the short trips just about anything might suffice (hybrid, mountain bike with smooth
tires, etc). But of course, part of the appeal to getting a "touring" bike isn't just for what
you'll immediately use it for, but the dream it represents... just sitting there, waiting to take
you some place new & exciting.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

"Cub Fan" <raycraig@highstream.net> wrote in message
news:SKj4a.9014$0q5.5244@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com...
> Does anyone have an opinion about the Trek 520. I would use it for short
(15
> to 20 mile) trips and some touring -- on roads and on bicycle paths
(crushed
> gravel).
>
> Would the Trek 520 be right for this purpose
>
> Cub Fan
>
  #3  
Old 02-18.-2003
Melisa Johns
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trek 520

Hi Mike Any thoughts on the Fuji Touring compared to the 520? Anything else in the running?

"Mike Jacoubowsky" <mikej1@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:4nk4a.2193$xx6.667@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
> The TREK 520 would be just fine for such purposes, as would some
cyclocross
> bikes (such as the TREK X01). For the short trips just about anything
might
> suffice (hybrid, mountain bike with smooth tires, etc). But of course,
part
> of the appeal to getting a "touring" bike isn't just for what you'll immediately use it for, but
> the dream it represents... just sitting there, waiting to take you some place new & exciting.
>
> --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
>
>
> "Cub Fan" <raycraig@highstream.net> wrote in message
> news:SKj4a.9014$0q5.5244@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com...
> > Does anyone have an opinion about the Trek 520. I would use it for short
> (15
> > to 20 mile) trips and some touring -- on roads and on bicycle paths
> (crushed
> > gravel).
> >
> > Would the Trek 520 be right for this purpose
> >
> > Cub Fan
> >
> >
> >
>
  #4  
Old 02-18.-2003
John Everett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trek 520

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:38:24 -0800, "Melisa Johns" <rubyebbyrd@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Any thoughts on the Fuji Touring compared to the 520? Anything else in the running?

When I was looking for a touring bike last summer I came close to buying a Trek 520 when a member of
our bike club put his Fuji Touring Series up for sale. I bought the Fuji and am quite happy with my
selection. My girlfriend rides a 520, and I'm hard pressed to see any significant difference between
the two. I'd probably be equally happy with either.

jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3
  #5  
Old 02-19.-2003
Mike Jacoubowsk
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trek 520

> Any thoughts on the Fuji Touring compared to the 520? Anything else in
the
> running?

The Fuji is a bit less of a "classic" touring bike than the TREK (STI instead of bar cons) and
rather different geometry. It's going to ride quite differently and has a couple strange anomalies,
like the wheelbase being longer on the 17" than the 19", and the headtube height is almost the same
for both 23 & 25" sizes. Doesn't mean it won't fit you, but might require a bit more creativity.

But I'm just going by what they show on the geometry charts and have no direct experience fitting
someone to the Fuji, just the TREK.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

"Melisa Johns" <rubyebbyrd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b2skl7$1fhaho$1@ID-176791.news.dfncis.de...
> Hi Mike Any thoughts on the Fuji Touring compared to the 520? Anything else in
the
> running?
>
>
> "Mike Jacoubowsky" <mikej1@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:4nk4a.2193$xx6.667@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
> > The TREK 520 would be just fine for such purposes, as would some
> cyclocross
> > bikes (such as the TREK X01). For the short trips just about anything
> might
> > suffice (hybrid, mountain bike with smooth tires, etc). But of course,
> part
> > of the appeal to getting a "touring" bike isn't just for what you'll immediately use it for, but
> > the dream it represents... just sitting
there,
> > waiting to take you some place new & exciting.
> >
> > --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
> >
> >
> > "Cub Fan" <raycraig@highstream.net> wrote in message
> > news:SKj4a.9014$0q5.5244@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com...
> > > Does anyone have an opinion about the Trek 520. I would use it for
short
> > (15
> > > to 20 mile) trips and some touring -- on roads and on bicycle paths
> > (crushed
> > > gravel).
> > >
> > > Would the Trek 520 be right for this purpose
> > >
> > > Cub Fan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
  #6  
Old 02-22.-2003
Melisa Johns
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trek 520

What about a Giant OCR Elite 0?

"Mike Jacoubowsky" <mikej1@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:BgF4a.1530$sD6.312646695@newssv...ws.prodigy.com...
> > Any thoughts on the Fuji Touring compared to the 520? Anything else in
> the
> > running?
>
> The Fuji is a bit less of a "classic" touring bike than the TREK (STI instead of bar cons)
> and rather different geometry. It's going to ride quite differently and has a couple strange
> anomalies, like the wheelbase being longer on the 17" than the 19", and the headtube height
> is almost
the
  #7  
Old 02-23.-2003
Mike Jacoubowsk
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trek 520

> What about a Giant OCR Elite 0?

Sounds like you're beginning to throw darts, which isn't a very good way to select a bike. Find a
really good dealer and try the bikes out. See how they fit, and particularly, see how the dealer
works with you on the fit (it's not just standing over the top tube and seeing how high you can lift
it). A really nice bike from a so-so dealer isn't going to be as good as a not-quite-as-nice bike
from a really good dealer.

Work on a limited time frame to finish your search and you'll be a lot happier. Otherwise you'll
just keep looking for more and more and more data, and always be worried that maybe you'd missed
something that you hadn't gotten to yet. You can go that route forever and never get a bike or,
worse yet, agonize over the process so much that it's not fun and even have doubts about your final
choice. We've seen this happen all too often, and it's not a pretty sight.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish